Centrifuge Study on the Submarine Mudflows

References

• Acosta, E. A., S. Tibana, M. D. S. S. de Almeida, and F. Saboya. 2017. Centrifuge modeling of hydroplaning in submarine slopes. Ocean Engineering 129:451–458. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.10.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, H. R. 1998. Physical modelling of construction processes in the mini-drum centrifuge. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, R. B., W. E. Stewart, and E. N. Lightfoot. 2002. Transport phenomena. 2nd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, E. T., J. Laue, B. Imre, and S. M. Springman. 2010. Experimental modelling of debris flow behaviour using a geotechnical centrifuge. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 47(7):742–762. doi: 10.1139/T09-141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breien, H., M. Pagliardi, F. Blasio, D. Issler, and A. Elverhшi. 2007. Experimental studies of subaqueous vs. subaerial debris flows–velocity characteristics as a function of the ambient fluid. In Submarine Mass Movements and their Consequences, Lykousis V, Sakellariou D., Locat J. (eds), Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium. Springer: Dordrecht; 101–110. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6512-5.
   Google Scholar
• Cabrera, M. A., and W. Wu. 2017. Space–time digital image analysis for granular flows. International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics 17(2):135–143. doi: 10.1680/jphmg.16.00018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorbolo, S., L. Maquet, M. Brandenbourger, F. Ludewig, G. Lumay, H. Caps, N. Vandewalle, S. Rondia, M. Mélard, J. van Loon., et al. 2013. Influence of the gravity on the discharge of a silo. Granular Matter 15(3):263–273. doi: 10.1007/s10035-013-0403-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gue, C. S., K. Soga, M. Bolton, and N. I. Thusyanthan. 2010. Centrifuge modelling of submarine landslide flows. Stress 2(2):8.
   Google Scholar
• Hampton, M. A. 1972. The role of subaqueous debris flow in generating turbidity currents. Journal of Sedimentary Research 42(4):775–793.
   Google Scholar
• Hampton, M., H. Lee, and J. Locat. 1996. Submarine landslides. Reviews of Geophysics 34(1):33–59. doi: 10.1029/95RG03287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilstad, T., A. Elverhøi, D. Issler, and J. G. Marr. 2004b. Subaqueous debris flow behaviour and its dependence on the sand/clay ratio: A laboratory study using particle tracking. Marine Geology 213(1–4):415–438. doi: 10.1016/j.margeo.2004.10.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilstad, T., J. G. Marr, A. Elverhøi, and C. B. Harbitz. 2004a. Laboratory studies of subaqueous debris flows by measurements of pore-fluid pressure and total stress. Marine Geology 213(1–4):403–414. doi: 10.1016/j.margeo.2004.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indraratna, B., A. S. Balasubramaniam, and S. Balachandran. 1992. Performance of test embankment constructed to failure on soft marine clay. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 118(1):12–33. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1992)118:1(12)
   Google Scholar
• Kafle, J., P. R. Pokhrel, K. B. Khattri, P. Kattel, B. M. Tuladhar, and S. P. Pudasaini. 2016. Landslide-generated tsunami and particle transport in Mountain Lakes and reservoirs. Annals of Glaciology 57(71):232–244. doi: 10.3189/2016AoG71A034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marr, J., P. Harff, G. Shanmugam, and G. Parker. 2001. Experiments on subaqueous sandy gravity flows: The role of clay and water content in flow dynamics and depositional structures. Geological Society of America Bulletin 113(11):1377. doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(2001)113<1377:EOSSGF>2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mergili, M.,. A. Emmer, A. Juřicová, A. Cochachin, J. T. Fischer, C. Huggel, and S. P. Pudasaini. 2018. How well can we simulate complex hydro-geomorphic process chains? The 2012 multi-lake outburst flood in the Santa Cruz valley (Cordillera blanca, Perú). Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. 43:1373–1389. doi: 10.1002/esp.4318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mergili, M.,. F. Jan-Thomas, J. Krenn, and S. P. Pudasaini. 2017. r. avaflow v1, an advanced open-source computational framework for the propagation and interaction of two-phase mass flows. Geoscientific Model Development 10(2):553. doi: 10.5194/gmd-10-553-2017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miura, N., S. Horpibulsuk, and T. S. Nagaraj. 2001. Engineering behavior of cement stabilized clay at high water content. Soils and Foundations 41 (5):33–45. doi: 10.3208/sandf.41.5_33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohrig, D., A. Elverhøi, and G. Parker. 1999. Experiments on the relative mobility of muddy subaqueous and subaerial debris flows, and their capacity to remobilize antecedent deposits. Marine Geology 154(1–4):117–129. doi: 10.1016/S0025-3227(98)00107-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohrig, D., and J. G. Marr. 2003. Constraining the efficiency of turbidity current generation from submarine debris flows and slides using laboratory experiments. Marine and Petroleum Geology 20(6–8):883–899. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2003.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pudasaini, S. P., and S. A. Miller. 2013. The hypermobility of huge landslides and avalanches. Engineering Geology 157:124–132. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pudasaini, S. P., and J. T. Fischer. 2016. A mechanical erosion model for two-phase mass flows. arXiv 1610:01806.
   Google Scholar
• Schofield, A. N. 1980. Cambridge geotechnical centrifuge op-erations. Geotechnique 30(3):227–268. doi: 10.1680/geot.1980.30.3.227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Take, W. A. 2003. The influence of seasonal moisture cycles on clay slopes. PhD Thesis. University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. N. 1995. Geotechnical centrifuge technology. London: Blackie Academic & Professional.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, M. 2016. Physical and numerical modelling of Submarine Landslides. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, M., Y. Rui, and Y. Xue. 2017. Centrifuge study on the runout distance of submarine debris flows. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology 1–11. doi: 10.1080/1064119X.2017.1411407.
   Google Scholar