Establishing a Marine Gravity Database around Egypt from Satellite Altimetry-Derived and Shipborne Gravity Data

References

• Andersen, O. B., and P. Knudsen. 2019. The DTU17 global marine gravity field: First validation results. International Association of Geodesy Symposia:83–7.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, O. B., P. Knudsen, and P. A. Berry. 2010. The DNSC08GRA global marine gravity field from double retracked satellite altimetry. Journal of Geodesy 84 (3):191–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, O. B., P. Knudsen, S. Kenyon, J. Factor, and S. Holmes. 2013. The DTU13 Global marine gravity field—first evaluation. In Ocean surface topography science team meeting. Boulder, Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Brockmann, J. M., T. Schubert, T. Mayer-Gürr, and W.-D. Schuh. 2019. The Earth’s gravity field as seen by the GOCE satellite - an improved sixth release derived with the time-wise approach (GO_CONS_GCF_2_TIM_R6). GFZ Data Services. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5880/ICGEM.2019.003
   Google Scholar
• Brockmann, J. M., T. Schubert, and W. Schuh. 2021. An improved model of the earth’s static gravity field solely derived from reprocessed GOCE data. Surveys in Geophysics 42 (2):277–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, A. N., and O. B. Andersen. 2016. Comparison of satellite altimetric gravity and ship-borne gravity - Offshore Western Australia. ASEG Extended Abstracts 2016 (1):1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Denker, H., and M. Roland. 2005. Compilation and evaluation of a consistent marine gravity data set surrounding Europe. In A window on the future of geodesy, 248–53. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27432-4_42
   Google Scholar
• Drinkwater, M. R., R. Floberghagen, R. Haagmans, D. Muzi, and A. Popescu. 2003. GOCE: ESA’s first earth explorer core mission. Space Science Reviews 108 (1/2):419–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairhead, J. D., C. M. Green, and M. E. Odegard. 2001. Satellite-derived gravity having an impact on marine exploration. The Leading EDGE 20 (8):873–6.
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone, W. E. 2009. Only use ship-track gravity data with caution: A case-study around Australia. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences 56 (2):195–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Förste, C., S. L. Bruinsma, O. Abrikosov, J.-M. Lemoine, T. Schaller, H.-J. Götze, J. Ebbing, J. C. Marty, F. Flechtner, G. Balmino, et al. 2014. EIGEN-6C4 The latest combined global gravity field model including GOCE data up to degree and order 2190 of GFZ Postdam and GRGS Toulouse. GFZ Data Services. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5880/icgem.2015.1
   Google Scholar
• Gaina, C., W. R. Roest, R. D. Müller, and P. Symonds. 1998. The opening of the Tasman Sea: A gravity anomaly animation. Earth Interactions 2 (4):1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Gilardoni, M., M. Reguzzoni, and D. Sampietro. 2016. GECO: A global gravity model by locally combining GOCE data and EGM2008. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 60 (2):228–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackney, R. I., and W. E. Featherstone. 2003. Geodetic versus geophysical perspectives of the ‘gravity anomaly. Geophysical Journal International 154 (1):35–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haxby, W. F., G. D. Karner, J. L. LaBrecqu, and J. K. Weisse. 1983. Digital images of combined oceanic and continental data sets and their use in tectonic studies. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union 64 (52):995–1004.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, B., and W. H. Moritz. 2006. Physical geodesy. Vienna: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ince, E. S., F. Barthelmes, S. Reißland, K. Elger, C. Förste, F. Flechtner, and H. Schuh. 2019. ICGEM – 15 years of successful collection and distribution of global gravitational models, associated services, and future plans. Earth System Science Data 11 (2):647–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiamehr, R. 2007. Qualification and refinement of the gravity database based on cross-validation approach - A case study of Iran. Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Hungarica 42 (3):285–95.
   Google Scholar
• Kvas, A., J. M. Brockmann, S. Krauss, T. Schubert, T. Gruber, U. Meyer, T. Mayer-Gürr, W. D. Schuh, A. Jäggi, and R. Pail. 2021. GOCO06s- A satellite-only global gravity field model. Earth System Science Data 13 (1):99–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, L., X. Jiang, S. Liu, L. Zheng, J. Zang, X. Zhang, and L. Liu. 2016. Calculating the marine gravity anomaly of the South China sea based on the inverse stokes formula. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 46:012062.
   Google Scholar
• Matheron, G. 1963. Principles of geostatistics. Economic Geology 58 (8):1246–66.
   Google Scholar
• Moritz, H. 1980. Advanced physical geodesy. Tunbridge, England: Karlsruhe: Wichmann.
   Google Scholar
• Omar, K. M., S. Ses, and A. Mohamed. 2005. Enhancement of Height System For Malaysia Using Space Technology: The Study of the Datum Bias Inconsistencies in Peninsular Malaysia. Faculty of Geoinformation Science and Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Pail, R., S. Bruinsma, F. Migliaccio, C. Förste, H. Goiginger, W. D. Schuh, E. Höck, M. Reguzzoni, J. M. Brockmann, O. Abrikosov, et al. 2011. First GOCE gravity field models derived by three different approaches. Journal of Geodesy 85 (11):819–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pail, R., T. Fecher, D. Barnes, J. F. Factor, S. A. Holmes, T. Gruber, and P. Zingerle. 2018. Short note: The experimental geopotential model XGM2016. Journal of Geodesy 92 (4):443–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlis, N. K., S. A. Holmes, S. C. Kenyon, and J. K. Factor. 2012. The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008). Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 117 (B4):n/a–/a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasul, N. M. A., I. C. F. Stewart, and Z. A. Nawab. 2015. Introduction to the red sea: Its origin, structure, and environment. In The Red Sea: The formation, morphology, oceanography and environment of a young ocean basin, 1–28. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45201-1
   Google Scholar
• Rexer, M., C. Hirt, and R. Pail. 2017. High-resolution global forward modelling: A degree-5480 global ellipsoidal topographic potential model. In EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts (Vol. 19, p. 7725). https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017EGUGA.19.7725R/abstract.
   Google Scholar
• Rudolph, S., J. Kusche, and K. H. Ilk. 2002. Investigations on the polar gap problem in ESA’s gravity field and steady-state ocean circulation explorer mission (GOCE). Journal of Geodynamics 33 (1–2):65–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandwell, D. T., E. Garcia, K. Soofi, P. Wessel, M. Chandler, and W. H. F. Smith. 2013. Toward 1-mGal accuracy in global marine gravity from CryoSat-2, Envisat, and Jason-1. The Leading Edge 32 (8):892–9.
   Google Scholar
• Sandwell, D. T., H. Harper, B. Tozer, and W. H. F. Smith. 2021. Gravity field recovery from geodetic altimeter missions. Advances in Space Research 68 (2):1059–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandwell, D. T., R. D. Müller, W. H. Smith, E. Garcia, and R. Francis. 2014. Marine geophysics. New global marine gravity model from CryoSat-2 and Jason-1 reveals buried tectonic structure. Science (New York, NY) 346 (6205):65–7.
   Google Scholar
• Sandwell, D. T., and W. H. Smith. 1997. Marine gravity anomaly from Geosat and ERS 1 satellite altimetry. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 102 (B5):10039–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandwell, D. T., W. H. Smith, S. Gille, S. Jayne, K. Soofi, and B. Coakley. 2001. Bathymetry from space. In Report of the high-resolution ocean topography science working group meeting, ed. D. B. Chelton, 87–108. Oregon State University, College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Sneeuw, N., and M. van Gelderen. 1997. The polar gap. In Geodetic boundary value problems in view of the one centimeter geoid, 559–68. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/bfb0011717
   Google Scholar
• Strykowski, G., and R. Forsberg. 1998. operational merging of satellite, airborne and surface gravity data by draping techniques. In Geodesy on the move, 243–8. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72245-5_35
   Google Scholar
• Tscherning, C. C. 1991. A strategy for gross-error detection in satellite altimeter data applied in the baltic-sea area for enhanced geoid and gravity determination. In Determination of the geoid: Present and future, 95–107. New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3104-2_12
   Google Scholar
• Wackemagel, H. 2013. Multivariable geostatistics: An introduction with applications. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05294-5
   Google Scholar
• Wei, L., X. Xinyu, L. Jiancheng, and Z. Guangbin. 2018. The determination of an ultra-high gravity field model SGG-UGM-1 by combining EGM2008 gravity anomaly and GOCE observation data. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica 47 (4):425–34.
   Google Scholar
• Wessel, P., and A. B. Watts. 1988. On the accuracy of marine gravity measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 93 (B1):393–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaki, A., A. H. Mansi, M. Selim, M. Rabah, and G. El-Fiky. 2018. Comparison of satellite altimetric gravity and global geopotential models with shipborne gravity in the Red Sea. Marine Geodesy 41 (3):258–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaki, A., and S. Mogren. 2021. A high-resolution gravimetric geoid model for Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Survey Review:1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2021.1944544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, S., A. Abulaitijiang, O. B. Andersen, D. T. Sandwell, and J. R. Beale. 2021. Comparison and evaluation of high-resolution marine gravity recovery via sea surface heights or sea surface slopes. Journal of Geodesy 95 (6):1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., J. Zhang, Y. Ji, and H. Zhang. 2003. Calculation of geoid undulations and gravity anomalies in the South China Sea by using the TOPEX/Poseidon and geosat altimeter data. In Ocean remote sensing and applications, ed. R. J. Frouin, Y. Yuan, and H. Kawamura, Vol. 4892, 521–8.
   Google Scholar
• Zingerle, P., R. Pail, T. Gruber, and X. Oikonomidou. 2020. The combined global gravity field model XGM2019e. Journal of Geodesy 94 (7):1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar