Aggregation Methods Using Bathymetry Sources of Differing Subjective Reliabilities for Navigation Mapping

References

• Bakdi, A., I. K. Glad, E. Vanem, and O. Engelhardtsen. 2019. AIS-based multiple vessel collision and grounding risk identification based on adaptive safety domain. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 8 (1):Article 5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beliakov, G., A. Pradera, and T. Calvo. 2007. Aggregation functions: A guide for practitioners. Heidelberg: Springer. ISBN: 978–3540737209.
   Google Scholar
• Calder, B. 2015. On risk-based expression of hydrographic uncertainty. Marine Geodesy 38 (2):99–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calder, B. R., S. J. Dijkstra, S. Hoy, K. Himschoot, and A. Schofield. 2020. A design for a trusted community bathymetry system. Marine Geodesy 43 (4):327–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chénier, R., M. Sagram, K. Omari, and A. Jirovec. 2020. Earth observation and artificial intelligence for improving safety to navigation in Canada low-impact shipping corridors. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 9 (6):383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, T. 2003. Dutton’s nautical navigation. 15th ed. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-1-55750-248-3.
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, P., F. Petry, and R. Yager. 2014. Comparative measures of aggregated uncertainty representations. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 5 (6):809–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EMODnet Bathymetry Consortium. 2020. EMODnet digital bathymetry (DTM). Accessed January 13, 2023. https://doi.org/10.12770/bb6a87dd-e579-4036-abe1-e649cea9881a
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., J. B. Carlin, H. S. Stern, D. B. Dunson, A. Vehtari, and D. B. Rubin. 2013. Bayesian data analysis. 3rd ed. Boca Raton, Florida: Chapman and Hall/CRC. ISBN: 978–1439840955
   Google Scholar
• Gilardoni, E., and J. Presedo. 2017. Navigation in shallow waters. Livingston Scotland, UK: Witherbys Publishing. ISBN: 978–1856096676.
   Google Scholar
• International Hydrographic Organization. 2000. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission, IHO Transfer Standard for Digital Hydrographic Data, IHO Publication S-57, Edition 3.10. Accessed January 27, 2022. https://iho.int/uploads/user/pubs/standards/s-57/31main.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• International Hydrographic Organization. 2019. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission, The IHO-IOC GEBCO Cook Book, IHO Publication B-11, Monaco, October 2019. Accessed January 27, 2022. https://www.gebco.net/data_and_products/gebco_cook_book/.
   Google Scholar
• International Hydrographic Organization. 2020. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission, Mariner’s Guide to Accuracy of Depth Information in Electronic Navigational Charts (ENC), IHO Publication S-67, Edition 1.0.0. Accessed November 21, 2022. https://iho.int/en/standards-and-specifications.
   Google Scholar
• International Hydrographic Organization. 2022. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission, S-100 Universal Hydrographic Data Model. Accessed November 25, 2022. http://iho.int/en/s-100-universal-hydrographic-data-model.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsson, M., L. A. Mayer, C. Bringensparr, C. F. Castro, R. Mohammad, P. Johnson, T. Ketter, D. Accettella, D. Amblas, L. An, et al. 2020. The International Bathymetric Chart of the Arctic Ocean Version 4.0. Scientific Data 7 (1):176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, M. G., E. B. Lee, M. Lee, and J. Y. Jung. 2019. Multi-criteria route planning with risk contour map for smart navigation. Ocean Engineering 172:72–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastrisios, C., and C. Ware. 2022. Textures for coding bathymetric data quality sectors on electronic navigational chart displays: Design and evaluation. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 49 (6):492–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastrisios, C., C. Ware, B. Calder, T. Butiewicz, L. Alexander, and O. Hauser. 2020. Nautical chart data uncertainty visualization as the means for integrating bathymetric, meteorological, and oceanographic information in support of coastal navigation. Presented at the Proceedings of the American Meteorological Society 100th Meeting. Boston, MA. Accessed January 27, 2022. http://ccom.unh.edu/sites/default/files/publications/Kastrisios_etal_AMS2020_Abstract_ChartDataUncertaintyVisualizationAndIntegration.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Masetti, G., T. Faulkes, and C. Kastrisios. 2018. Automated identification of discrepancies between nautical charts and survey soundings. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 7 (10):392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathematicalmonk. 2012. Expectation of a Dirichlet random variable. Palo Alto, CA: YouTube video hosted by Google. Accessed March 25, 2022. https://youtu.be/emnfq4txDuI.
   Google Scholar
• Mathworks. 2021. MATLAB (Version 2021b). Natick, MA: The Mathworks Inc. Accessed January 27, 2022. www.mathworks.com.
   Google Scholar
• Naevestad, T. O., R. O. Phillips, K. V. Størkersen, A. Laiou, and G. Yannis. 2019. Safety culture in maritime transport in Norway and Greece: Exploring national, sectorial and organizational influences on unsafe behaviours and work accidents. Marine Policy 99:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration – Office of Coastal Survey. 2022. NOAA ENC – Electronic Navigation Charts. Accessed January 27, 2022. https://nauticalcharts.noaa.gov/charts/noaa-enc.html.
   Google Scholar
• OpenCPN. 2022. OpenCPN Chart Plotter Navigation, Version 5.6.2. Accessed November 25, 2022. https://www.openCPN.org.
   Google Scholar
• Petry, F., P. Elmore, and R. Yager. 2015. Combining uncertain information of differing modalities. Information Sciences 322:237–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preparata, F., and M. Shamos. 1988. Computational geometry - An introduction. Springer-Verlag Berlin: GDR. ISBN: 978–0387961316.
   Google Scholar
• QGIS.org. 2020. QGIS Geographic Information System, Version 3.12. QGIS Association. Accessed January 13, 2023. http://www.qgis.org.
   Google Scholar
• Raiffa, H., and R. Schlaifer. 2000. Applied statistical decision theory. New York: Wiley Classics Library. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Saddler, R. 2006. Graveyard of the Pacific: Gateway to the Northwest. Accessed November 24, 2021. https://www.blueoregon.com/2006/01/graveyard_of_th/.
   Google Scholar
• Steinbeck, M., and R. Koschke. 2021. TinySpline: A small, yet powerful library for interpolating, transforming, and querying NURBS, B-splines, and Bezier curves. Paper presented at the 28th IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER), (Virtual Meeting), Honolulu, HI, March 09–12.
   Google Scholar
• Walhey, F. 2013. U.S. navy to scrap vessel stuck on Philippine reef. New York Times, January 31. Accessed January 27, 2022. https://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/01/world/asia/us-navy-to-scrap-vessel-stuck-on-philippine-reef.html.
   Google Scholar
• Weatherall, P., K. M. Marks, M. Jakobsson, T. Schmitt, S. Tani, J. E. Arndt, M. Rovere, D. Chayes, V. Ferrini, R. Wigley, et al. 2015. A new digital bathymetric model of the world’s oceans. Earth and Space Science 2 (8):331–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilma, D. 2006. Graveyard of the Pacific: Shipwrecks on the Washington Coast. Accessed November 24, 2021. https://www.historylink.org/File/7936.
   Google Scholar
• Yager, R. 1988. On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 18 (1):183–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yager, R., P. Elmore, and F. Petry. 2017. Soft likelihood in combining evidence. Information Fusion 36:185–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yager, R. R. 2012. Conditional approach to possibility-probability fusion. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 20 (1):46–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yager, R. R., and J. Kacprzyk. 1997. The ordered weighted averaging operators: Theory and applications. Norwell, MA: Kluwer. ISBN: 978–0792399346
   Google Scholar