Low-cost multi-GNSS, single-frequency RTK averaging for marine applications: accurate stationary positioning and vertical tide measurements

References

• Alkan, R. M., I. M. Ozulu, V. Ilçi, and M. Kahveci. 2015. Single-baseline RTK GNSS Positioning for Hydrographic Surveying. In EGU General Assembly, Vienna, Austria. 1 April 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, J., N. H. Heck, and H. F. Johnston. 1939. The three-hour-range index measuring geomagnetic activity. Journal of Geophysical Research 44 (4):411–54.
   Google Scholar
• Bishanth, S., D. Wells, S. Howden, D. Dodd, and D. Wiesenburg. 2004. Development of an operational RTK GPS-equipped buoy for tidal datum determination. International Hydrographic Review 5 (1):54–64.
   Google Scholar
• Bisnath, S., D. Wells, M. Santos, and K. Cove. 2004. Initial results from a long baseline, kinematic, differential GPS carrier phase experiement in a marine envrionment. In PLANS 2004. Position Location and Navigation Symposium (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37556) , 26–9 April 2004
   Google Scholar
• Blick, G. 2018. Joining New Zealand land and sea vertical datums (JLAS). XXVI FIG Congress , Istanbul, 6–11 May 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Brissette, M. 2012. Stop using DGPS! The unsuitability of non-centimetric positioning for shallow-water MBES surveys. Hydro International. Lemmer, The Netherlands: Geomares.
   Google Scholar
• Canter, P., and L. Lalumiere. 2005. Hydrographic surveying on the ellipsoid with inertially-aided RTK. Applanix. https://www.applanix.com/pdf/POSMV_2005_09_HydrographicSurveying.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Clare, M. A., M. E. Vardy, M. J. Cartigny, P. J. Talling, M. D. Himsworth, J. K. Dix, J. M. Harris, R. J. Whitehouse, and M. Belal. 2017. Direct monitoring of active geohazards: Emerging geophysical tools for deep‐water assessments. Near Surface Geophysics 15 (4):427–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohn, N., D. L. Anderson, T. Susa, P. Ruggiero, D. Honegger, and M. Haller. 2014. Observations of intertidal bars welding to the shoreline: Examining the mechanisms of onshore sediment transport and beach recovery. Proceedings of the American Geophysical Union , Fall Meeting 2014, San Francisco, CA, USA, 15–9 December 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Dabove, P. 2019. The usability of GNSS mass-market receivers for cadastral surveys considering RTK and NRTK techniques. Geodesy and Geodynamics 10 (4):282–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, B. 2014. Evaluation of GNSS-derived tidal information in hydrographic applications. In Hydro14, Aberdeen, Scotland, 28–30.
   Google Scholar
• DeLoach, S. R., and B. Remondi. 1991. Decimeter positioning for dredging and hydrographic surveying. In 6. Fort Belvoir, VA: US Army Topographic Engineering Center.
   Google Scholar
• DeLoach, S. R. 1995. GPS tides: A project to determine tidal datums with the global positioning system. M.Eng report, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering Techical Report No. 181, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada, 105.
   Google Scholar
• Dodd, D., and J. Mills. 2011. Ellipsoidally referenced surveys: Issues and solutions. International Hydrographic Review 6:19–29.
   Google Scholar
• Dodd, D., B. Mchaffey, G. Smith, K. Barbor, S. O-Brien, and M. van Norden. 2009. Chart datum transfer using a GPS tide buoy in Chesapeake Bay. International Hydrographic Review (2):39–51.
   Google Scholar
• Earth Observing System Data and Information System (EOSDIS). 2018. Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) Navigation Files . NASA's Earth Science Data Systems (ESDS) Program. ftp://ftp.cddis.eosdis.nasa.gov/gnss/data/campaign/mgex/daily/rinex3/2018/brdm
   Google Scholar
• Eeg, J. 2004. Verification of the Z-Component in the RTK survey of Drogden Channel. The International Hydrographic Review 5 (2):16–25.
   Google Scholar
• Elsobeiey, M. 2017. Performance analysis of low-cost single-frequency Gps receivers in hydrographic surveying. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XLII-4/W5:67–71.
   Google Scholar
• European Space Agency (ESA). 2009. EGNOS: European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service. In. www.esa.int/EGNOS. Online pdf.
   Google Scholar
• FIG (International Federation of Surveyors) Commission 4. 2010. Guidelines for the planning, execution and management of hydrographic surveys in ports and harbours. In FIG Publication 56. edited by Working Group Hydrographic Surveying in Practice. Copenhagen, Denmark: International Federation of Surveyors (FIG).
   Google Scholar
• Fugro. 2016. MarineStarTM positioning services. Leidschendam, Netherlands: Fugro.
   Google Scholar
• Giardina, M. F., M. D. Earle, J. C. Cranford, and D. A. Osiecki. 2000. Development of a low-cost tide gauge. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology 17 (4):575–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, H. 2010. Quality control of GPS RTK technology in road engineering. 2010 International Conference on Mechanic Automation and Control Engineering, Wuhan, China, 26–28 June 2010.
   Google Scholar
• International Hydrographic Organization (IHO). 2020. International hydrographic organization standards for hydrographic surveys. In S-44. Edition 6.0.0. Monaco: International Hydrographic Organization.
   Google Scholar
• International Hydrographic Organization (IHO). 2021. About the IHO. International Hydrographic Organization (IHO). https://iho.int/en/about-the-iho.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, P., C. Bird, A. Sinclair, J. Higham, and A. Plater. 2021. Testing an “IoT” Tide Gauge Network for Coastal Monitoring. IoT 2 (1):17–32.
   Google Scholar
• Land Information New Zealand (LINZ). 2022. Standard port tidal levels. Accessed January 2023. https://www.linz.govt.nz/guidance/marine-information/tide-prediction-guidance/standard-port-tidal-levels.
   Google Scholar
• Land Information New Zealand (LINZ). 2020. HYSPEC contract specifications for hydrographic surveys version 2.0. Wellington, New Zealand: Land Information New Zealand (LINZ).
   Google Scholar
• Langley, R. B., P. J. Teunissen, and O. Montenbruck. 2017. Part A Introduction to GNSS. In Springer handbook of global navigation satellite systems, ed. Peter Teunissen and Oliver Montenbruck, 605–38. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lei, J., F. Li, S. Zhang, C. Xiao, S. Xie, H. Ke, Q. Zhang, and W. Li. 2018. Ocean tides observed from A GPS receiver on floating sea ice near Chinese Zhongshan Station, Antarctica. Marine Geodesy 41 (4):353–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ligteringen, T., J. Loog, and L. Dorst. 2014. GNSS Based Hydrographic Surveying clear advantages and hidden obstacles. Paper presented at the European Navigation Conference on GNSS 2014, Rotterdam, NL, April 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Lowie, N. 2017. Evaluation of the detection and quantification of sediment plumes caused by dredging activities using a multibeam echousnder . Master of Science in Geology, Faculty of Sciences, Ghent University.
   Google Scholar
• Maritime New Zealand (MNZ). 2020. Good practice guidelines for hydrographic surveys in New Zealand harbours and ports. Wellington, New Zealand: Maritime New Zealand, New Zealand Government.
   Google Scholar
• Kraft, M., and H. Sternberg. 2019. Optimizing a low-cost multi sensor system for hydrographic depth determination. Hydro-International. Lemmer, The Netherlands: Geomares
   Google Scholar
• Matzka, J., C. Stolle, Y. Yamazaki, O. Bronkalla, and A. Morschhauser. 2021. The geomagnetic Kp index and derived indices of geomagnetic activity. Space Weather 19: e2020SW002641. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1029%2F2020SW002641&mobileUi=0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, J., and D. Dodd. 2014. Ellipsoidally referenced surveying for hydrography. In FIG Publication No. 62. Copenhagen, Denmark: International Federation of Surveyors (FIG).
   Google Scholar
• Naismith, J. M., G. A. Jeffress, and D. Prouty. 1999. GLONASS and GPS: Redundancy and reliability obtained by combining the two systems. Paper presented at the Dynamic Positioning Conference, Houston, October 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Odijk, D. 2017. Part D GNSS algorithms and models. In Springer handbook of global navigation satellite systems, ed. Peter Teunissen and Oliver Montenbruck, 605–38. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Odolinski, R., and P. J. G. Teunissen. 2016. Single-frequency, dual-GNSS versus dual-frequency, single-GNSS: A low-cost and high-grade receivers GPS-BDS RTK analysis. Journal of Geodesy 90 (11):1255–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odolinski, R., and P. J. G. Teunissen. 2017a. Low-cost, high-precision, single-frequency GPS–BDS RTK positioning. GPS Solutions 21 (3):1315–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odolinski, R., and P. J. G. Teunissen. 2017b. Low-cost, 4-system, precise GNSS positioning: A GPS, Galileo, BDS and QZSS ionosphere-weighted RTK analysis. Measurement Science and Technology 28 (12):125801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odolinski, R., and P. J. G. Teunissen. 2019. An assessment of smartphone and low-cost multi-GNSS single-frequency RTK positioning for low, medium and high ionospheric disturbance periods. Journal of Geodesy 93 (5):701–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odolinski, R., and P. J. G. Teunissen. 2020. Best integer equivariant estimation: Performance analysis using real data collected by low-cost, single- and dual-frequency, multi-GNSS receivers for short- to long-baseline RTK positioning. Journal of Geodesy 94, 91. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00190-020-01423-2#citeas
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odolinski, R., P. J. G. Teunissen, and D. Odijk. 2015. Combined BDS, Galileo, QZSS and GPS single-frequency RTK. GPS Solutions 19 (1):151–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, P. 2003. RTK tide basics. Hydro International 7 (10):26–9.
   Google Scholar
• Specht, M., C. Specht, H. Lasota, and P. Cywiński. 2019. Assessment of the steering precision of a hydrographic unmanned surface vessel (USV) along sounding profiles using a low-cost multi-global navigation satellite system (GNSS) receiver supported autopilot. Sensors 19 (18):3939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimel, A. C., D. Ierodiaconou, L. Hulands, and D. M. Kennedy. 2015. Accounting for uncertainty in volumes of seabed change measured with repeat multibeam sonar surveys. Continental Shelf Research 111:52–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teunissen, P. J. G. 1995. The least squares ambiguity decorrelation adjustment: A method for fast GPS integer estimation. Journal of Geodesy.70 (1-2):65–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teunissen, P. J. G. 2019. A new GLONASS FDMA model. GPS Solutions 23 (4):100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thom, J., R. Odolinski, L. McDonald, and P. Denys. 2019. On the use of between-baseline differenced and instantaneous RTK positioning while using simultaneous GNSS measurements. Survey Review 51 (367):345–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tradacete, M., Á. Sáez, J. F. Arango, C. G. Huélamo, P. Revenga, R. Barea, E. López-Guillén, and L. M. Bergasa. 2019. Positioning system for an electric autonomous vehicle based on the fusion of multi-GNSS RTK and odometry by using an extented kalman filter. In: Fuentetaja Pizán, R., García Olaya, Á., Sesmero Lorente, M., Iglesias Martínez, J., Ledezma Espino, A. (eds) Advances in Physical Agents. WAF 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 855. Cham, CH: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Trimble. 2014. Trimble R10 GNSS receiver user guide. Ed. by Trimble Navigation Limited. Vol. Version 1.10, Revision B. Sunnyvale, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Tussock Innovation. 2018. LS1 remote water level sensor datasheet. Tussock Innovation. https://help.waterwatch.io/article/3-ls1-water-level-sensor-datasheet.
   Google Scholar
• US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2013. Engineering and design – Hydrographic surveying. In Enginner manual EM 1110-2-1003 . Washington, DC, United States of America.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, D. E., and A. Kleusberg. 1992. Feasibility of a kinematic differential global positioning system, technical report DRP-91-1. In Dredging research program. University of New Brunswick. Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada: Department of the Army, US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE).
   Google Scholar