Mobile Phone Use in Romantic Relationships

References

• Baltes, B. B., Dickson, M. W., Sherman, M. P., Bauer, C. C., & LaGanke, J. S. (2002). Computer-mediated communication and group decision making: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87, 156–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, N. S. (2008). Always on: Language in an online and mobile world. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baym, N. K., Zhang, Y. B., & Lin, M. C. (2004). Social interactions across media: Interpersonal communications on the internet, telephone, and face-to-face. New Media & Society, 6, 299–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, N., & Peña, J. (2015). Equity, relational maintenance, and linguistic features of text messaging. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 499–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalfen, R. (2009). ‘It’s only a picture’: Sexting, ‘smutty’ snapshots and felony charges. Visual Studies, 24, 258–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, Y. S., Gray, H. M., & Ambady, N. (2005). The glimpsed world: Unintended communication and unintended perception. The New Unconscious, 308–333.
   Google Scholar
• Coyne, S. M., Stockdale, L., Busby, D., Iverson, B., & Grant, D. M. (2011). I luv u ;)! A descriptive study of the media use of individuals in romantic relationships. Family Relations, 60, 150–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cupples, J., & Thompson, L. (2010). Heterotextuality and digital foreplay. Feminist Media Studies, 10, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Dake, J. A., Price, J. H., Maziarz, L., & Ward, B. (2012). Prevalence and correlates of sexting behavior in adolescents. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 7, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• De Gournay, C. (2002). Pretense of intimacy in France. In J. E. Katz & M. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 193–205). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drouin, M., & Landgraff, C. (2012). Texting, sexting, and attachment in college students’ romantic relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 444–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drouin, M., Vogel, K. N., Surbey, A., & Stills, J. R. (2013). Let’s talk about sexting, baby: Computer-mediated sexual behaviors among young adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, A25–A30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggan, M. (2015, August 19). Mobile messaging and social media 2015. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/19/mobile-messaging-and-social-media-2015/
   Google Scholar
• Duran, R. L., Kelly, L., & Rotaru, T. (2011). Mobile phones in romantic relationships and the dialectic of autonomy vs. connection. Communication Quarterly, 59, 19–36.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, X., & Culwin, F. (2005). When fingers do the talking: A study of text messaging. Interacting with Computers, 17, 167–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, C. J. (2011). Sexting behaviors among young Hispanic women: Incidence and association with other high-risk sexual behaviors. Psychiatric Quarterly, 82, 239–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grinter, R. E., & Palen, L. (2002). Instant messaging in teenage life. In E. F. Churchill & J. McCarthy (Eds.), Proceedings of the ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 21–30). New York, NY: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, E. G. (2004). Adolescent internet use: What we expect, what teens report. Applied Developmental Psychology, 25, 633–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. A., & Baym, N. K. (2012). Calling and texting (too much): Mobile maintenance expectations, (over) dependence, entrapment, and friendship satisfaction. New Media Society, 14, 316–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hian, L. B., Chuan, S. L., Trevor, T. M. K., & Detenber, B. H. (2004). Getting to know you: Exploring the development of relational intimacy in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 9. Retrieved April 30, 2015 from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.dist.lib.usu.edu/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2004.tb00290.x/full
   Google Scholar
• Igarashi, T., Takai, J., & Yoshida, T. (2005). Gender differences in social network development via mobile phone text messages: A longitudinal study. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 691–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishii, K. (2006). Implications of mobility: The uses of personal communication media in everyday life. Journal of Communication, 56, 346–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingsbury, M., & Coplan, R. J. (2016). RU mad@ me? Social anxiety and interpretation of ambiguous text messages. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 368–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuwabara, K., Watanabe, T., Ohguro, T., Itoh, Y., & Maeda, Y. (2002). Connectedness oriented communication: Fostering a sense of connectedness to augment social relationships. IPSJ Journal, 43, 3270–3279.
   Google Scholar
• LaRossa, R., & Reitzes, D. C. (1993). Symbolic interactionism and family studies. In P. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 135–166). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lenhart, A., Anderson, M., & Smith, A. (2015, October 1). Teens, technology and romantic relationships. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/10/01/teens-technology-and-romantic-relationships/
   Google Scholar
• Lenhart, A., & Duggan, M. (2014, February 11). Couples, the internet, and social media. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/02/11/couples-the-internet-and-social-media/
   Google Scholar
• Lenhart, A., Ling, R., Campbell, S., & Purcell, K. (2010). Teens and mobile phones. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved October 7, 2013 from http://www.pewinternet.org/
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C., & Fabos, B. (2005). Instant messaging, literacies, and social identities. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 470–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Licoppe, C. (2004). ‘Connected’ presence: The emergence of a new repertoire for managing social relationships in a changing communication technoscape. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 22, 135–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, S., & Tuney, S. (2015). Can texting be used to improve romantic relationships?—The effects of sending positive text messages on relationship satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 670–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madell, D. E., & Muncer, J. J. (2007). Control over social interactions: An important reason for young people’s use of the internet and mobile phones for communication? Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 10, 137–140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller, R. S. (2012). Intimate relationships (6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Miller-Ott, A. E., & Kelly, L. (2015). The presence of cell phones in romantic partner face-to-face interactions: An expectancy violation theory approach. Southern Communication Journal, 80, 253–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller-Ott, A. E., Kelly, L. & Duran R. L. (2012). The effects of cell phone usage rules on satisfaction in romantic relationships. Communication Quarterly, 60, 17–34.
   Google Scholar
• Misra, S., Cheng, L., Genevie, J., & Yuan, M. (2014). The iPhone effect: The quality of in-person social interactions in the presence of mobile devices. Environment and Behavior, 2, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, D., Olson-Sigg, A., & Larson, P. (2008). The couple checkup: Finding your relationship strengths. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, A. B., Becker, J. V., Tehee, M., & Mackelprang, E. (2014). Sexting behaviors among college students: Cause for concern? International Journal of Sexual Health, 26, 79–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, J. (2009). Text messaging and connectedness within close interpersonal relationships. Marriage and Family Review, 45, 697–716.
   Google Scholar
• Przybylski, A. K., & Weinstein, N. (2013). Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 237–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehman, U. S., & Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (2007). A cross cultural examination of the relation of marital communication behavior and marital satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 759–763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, D., & Reid, F. (2004 February). Insights into the social and psychological effects of SMS text messaging. Retrieved from http://www.160characters.org/documents/ SocialEffectsOfTextMessaging.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rice, E., Rhoades, H., Winetrobe, H., Sanchez, M., Montoya, J., Plant, A., & Kordic, T. (2012). Sexually explicit cell phone messaging associated with sexual risk among adolescents. Pediatrics, 130, 667–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringrose, J., Gill, R., Livingstone, S., & Harvey, L. (2012). A qualitative study of children, young people and ‘sexting’: A report prepared for the NSPCC. London, UK: NSPCC.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R. (2008). Cell phone communication versus face-to-face communication: The effect of mode of communication on relationship satisfaction and the difference in quality of communication. Unpublished master’s thesis. Kent State University, Kent, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Sex and Tech. (2008). Sex and tech: Results from a survey of teens and young adults. Washington, DC: The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy.
   Google Scholar
• Sidelinger, R. J., Ayash, G., Godorhazy, A., & Tibbles, D. (2008). Couples go online: Relational maintenance behaviors and relational characteristics use in dating relationships. Human Communication, 11, 341–355.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. R., & Hamon, R. R. (2012). Exploring family theories. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stonard, K. E., Bowen, E., Lawrence, T. R., & Price, S. A. (2014). The relevance of technology to the nature, prevalence and impact of adolescent dating violence and abuse: A research synthesis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19, 390–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strayer, D. L., Drews, F. A., & Johnston, W. A. (2003). Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 23–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strayer, D. L., & Johnston, W. A. (2001). Driven to distraction: Dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular phone. Psychological Science, 12, 462–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subrahmanyam, K., & Greenfield, P. (2008). Online communication and adolescent relationships. Future of Children, 18, 119–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, A. S., & Harper, R. (2003). The gift of gab? A design oriented sociology of young people’s use of mobiles. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 12, 267–296.
   Google Scholar
• Temple, J. R., Paul, J. A., van den Berg, P., Le, V. D., McElhany, A., & Temple, B. W. (2012). Teen sexting and its association with sexual behaviors. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 166, 828–833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurlow, C. (2003). Generation Txt? The sociolinguistics of young people’s text messaging. Discourse analysis online. Available from http://extra.shu.ac.uk/daol/articles/v1/n1/a3/thurlow2002003-paper.html
   Google Scholar
• Toma, C. L., & Choi, M. (2016, February). Mobile media matters: Media use and relationship satisfaction among geographically close dating couples. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, San Francisco, CA, USA (pp. 394–404). doi:10.1145/2818048.2835204.
   Google Scholar
• Tulane, S. (2012). Social implications of adolescent text messaging. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Utah State University, Logan, UT.
   Google Scholar
• Tulane, S., Beckert, T. (2013). Perceptions of texting: A comparison of female high school and college students. North American Journal of Psychology, 15, 395–404.
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Van Kleemput, K. (2010). ‘I’ll see you on IM, text, or call you’: A social network approach of adolescents’ use of communication media. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30, 75–85.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, S., Sanci, L., & Temple-Smith, M. (2013). Sexting: Young women’s and men’s views on its nature and origins. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52, 697–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisskirch, R. S., & Delevi, R. (2011). “Sexting” and adult romantic attachment. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1697–1701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, J. M., & Klein, D. M. (2008). Family theories (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar