Validation of the Subjective Well-Being in Couple Relationship Scale (SWCR)

References

• Alaminos, A., & Castejón, J. L. (2006). Elaboración, análisis e interpretación de encuestas, cuestionarios y escalas de opinión [Surveys, questionnaires and opinion scales design, analysis and interpretation]. Alicante: Universidad de Alicante.
   Google Scholar
• Archuleta, K. L. (2013). Couples, money, and expectations: Negotiating financial management roles to increase relationship satisfaction. Marriage & Family Review, 49(5), 391–411. doi:10.1080/01494929.2013.766296
   Google Scholar
• Arnaldo, O. (2001). Construcción y validación de un instrumento de conflicto para parejas mexicanas [Construction and validation of an instrument of conflict for Mexican couples] (Unpublished Dissertation on Psychology), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México.
   Google Scholar
• Avendaño Barroeta, A., & Sánchez Escárcega, J. (2002). La dependencia emocional en las parejas [Emotional dependence in couple relationships]. Revista Intercontinental de Psicología y Educación, 4(1), 91–97.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, M. S. (1950). Tests of significance in factor analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 77–85. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1950.tb00285.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bischoff, R. (2008). The role of dependence in couple relationships. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy: Innovations in Clinical and Educational Interventions, 7(3), 267–273. doi:10.1080/15332690802238050
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 133–162). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Capafóns Bonet, J. I., & Sosa Castilla, C. D. (2009). Tratando … problemas de pareja [Treating … couple problems]. Madrid: Pirámide, D.L.
   Google Scholar
• Capafóns, J. I., & Sosa, C. D. (2015). Relaciones de pareja y habilidades sociales: El respeto interpersonal [Relationships and social skills: Interpersonal respect]. Behavioral Psychology/Psicologia Conductual, 23(1), 25–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, D. L., Hanson, S., & Fitzroy, A. (2015). The division of childcare, sexual intimacy, and relationship quality in couples. Sociology Faculty Publications, Paper 4.
   Google Scholar
• Carrasco, M. J. (1996). Cuestionario de aserción en la pareja [Assertion in couples Questionnaire]. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, A. (1988). Dysfunctional interaction patterns in couples. In P. Noller & M. A. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Perspectives on marital interaction (pp. 31–52). Clevedon & Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of test. Psycometrika, 16, 297–334. doi:10.1007/bf02310555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Lara-Guijarro, E., & Ballesteros-Velázquez, B. (2007). Métodos de investigación en Educación Social [Research methods in social education]. Madrid: Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia.
   Google Scholar
• DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dogan, T., Tugut, N., & Golbasi, Z. (2013). The relationship between sexual quality of life, happiness, and satisfaction with life in married Turkish women. Sex Disabilities, 31, 239–247. doi:10.1007/s11195-013-9302-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández Jiménez, C. (1999). Ciclos vitales en las relaciones de pareja [Life cycles in couple relationships] (PhD Thesis), Universidad de Granada, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrer Pérez, V. A., & Bosch Fiol, E. (2003). Mujeres maltratadas: Análisis de características sociodemográficas, de la relación de pareja y del maltrato (I) [Battered women: Analysis of socio-demographic, couple relationship and abuse characteristics (I)]. Psychosocial Intervention, 12(3), 325–344.
   Google Scholar
• Finch, H. (2006). Comparison of the performance of Varimax and Promax rotations: Factor structure recovery for dichotomous items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43, 39–52. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2006.00003.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores Galaz, M. M. (2011). Comunicación y conflicto: ¿qué tanto impactan en la satisfacción marital? [Communication and conflict: How influential they are in marital satisfaction?]. Acta de investigación psicológica, 1(2), 216–232.
   Google Scholar
• Fontanil, Y., Ezama, E., Fernández, R., Gil, P., Herrero, F. J., & Paz, D. (2005). Prevalencia del maltrato de pareja contra las mujeres [Prevalence of partner abuse against women]. Psicothema, 17(1), 90–95.
   Google Scholar
• Fredman, N., & Sherman, R. (1987). Handbook of measurements for marriage and family therapy. Philadelphia: Brunner/Mazel.
   Google Scholar
• Garrido Garduño, A., Reyes Luna, A. G., Torres Velázquez, L. E., & Ortega Silva, P. (2008). Importancia de las expectativas de pareja en la dinámica familiar [Importance of the couple expectations in family dynamics]. Enseñanza e Investigación en Psicología, 13(2), 231–238.
   Google Scholar
• George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 Update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(2), 186–192. doi:10.2307/3172650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson-Davis, C. M. (2009). Money, marriage, and children: Testing the financial expectations and family formation theory. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(1), 146–160. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00586.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil Pascual, J. A. (2011). Técnicas e instrumentos para la recogida de información [Techniques and instruments for collecting information]. Madrid: UNED.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-Zapiain, J., Ortiz, M. J., & Gómez-Lepe, J. (2011). Experiencia sexual, estilos de apego y tipos de cuidados en las relaciones de pareja [Sexual experience, attachment styles and types of care in couple relationships]. Anales de Psicología, 27(2), 447–456.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1999). Análisis multivariante (5th ed.). Madrid: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 50, 93–98. doi:10.2307/352430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrickson, A. E., & White, P. O. (1964). PROMAX: A quick method for rotation to oblique simple structure. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 17, 65–70. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1964.tb00244.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidalgo García, M. V., & Menéndez Álvarez-Dardet, S. (2009). Apoyo a las familias durante el proceso de transición a la maternidad y la paternidad [Support to families in the transition to motherhood and fatherhood]. Familia: Revista de Ciencias y Orientación Familiar, 38, 133–152.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, M. (1970). Non-verbal communication and marital satisfaction. Family Process, 9, 449–456. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.1970.00449.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second generation Little Jiffy. Psychometrika, 35, 401–415. doi:10.1007/bf02291817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31–36. doi:10.1007/bf02291575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, L., & Harder, D. W. (1991). The sexual desire conflict scale for women: Construction, internal consistency and two initial validity tests. Psychological Reports, 68(3), 1275–1282. doi:10.2466/pr0.1991.68.3c.1275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemeter, P., & Fiegl, J. (1998). Adjusting to life when assisted conception fails. Human Reproduction, 13(4), 1099–1105. doi:10.1093/humrep/13.4.1099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhle, B. X. (2011). Did you have sex with him? Do you love her? An in vivo test of sex differences in jealous interrogations. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(8), 1044–1047. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawley, D. N., & Maxwell, A. E. (1971). Factor analysis as a statistical method. London: Butterworths.
   Google Scholar
• Ledermann, T., Bodenmann, G., Rudaz, M., & Bradbury, N. B. (2010). Stress, communication, and marital quality in couples. Family Relations, 59(2), 195–206. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2010.00595.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, H. J., & Wallace, K. M. (1959). Short marital adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage and Family Living, 21(3), 251–255. doi:10.2307/348022
   Google Scholar
• Maroto-Navarro, G., García-Calvente, M. M., & Mateo-Rodríguez, I. (2004). El reto de la maternidad en España: Dificultades sociales y sanitarias [The challenge of maternity in Spain: Social and health difficulties.]. Gaceta Sanitaria, 18(2), 13–23. doi:10.1157/13061991
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martínez-Álvarez, J. L., Fuertes-Martín, A., Orgaz-Baz, B., Vicario-Molina, I., & González-Ortega, E. (2014). Vínculos afectivos en la infancia y calidad en las relaciones de pareja de jóvenes adultos: el efecto mediador del apego actual [Parental attachment in childhood and quality of the romantic relationships of young adults: The mediating effect of adult attachment]. Anales de Psicología, 30(1). doi:10.6018/analesps.30.1.135051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matud Aznar, M. P., Carballeira Abella, M., & Marrero Quevedo, R. J. (2001). Validación de un inventario de evaluación del maltrato a la mujer por su pareja: el APCM [Validation of inventary of abuse against women by their partner (APCM)]. Psicopatología Clínica Legal y Forense, 1(2), 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Medina, A. M., Lederhos, C. L. & Lillis, T. A. (2009). Sleep disruption and decline in marital satisfaction across the transition to parenthood. Families, Systems and Health, 27(2), 153–160. doi:10.1037/a0015762
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montes-Berges, B. (2009). Patrones de comunicación, diferenciación y satisfacción en la relación de pareja: Validación y análisis de estas escalas en muestras españolas [Communication pattern, differentiation and satisfaction in couple relationships: Validation and anaysis of these scales in Spanish samples]. Anales de psicología, 25(2), 288–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muise, A., Christofides, E., & Desmarais, S. (2009). More information than you ever wanted: Does Facebook bring out the green-eyed monster of jealousy? Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 12(4), 441–444. doi:10.1089/cpb.2008.0263
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muñiz, J. (2000). Teoría clásica de los tests [Classical test theory]. Madrid: Pirámide.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Oddens, B. J., den Tonkelaar, I., & Nieuwenhuyse, H. (1999). Psychosocial experiences in women facing fertility problems - a comparative survey. Human Reproduction, 14(1), 255–261. doi:10.1093/humrep/14.1.255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paleari, E. G., Regalia, C., & Fincham, F. D. (2010). Forgiveness and conflict resolution in close relationships: Within and cross partner effects. Universitas Psychologica, 9(1), 35–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmetto, N., Davidson, L., Breitbart, V., & Rickert, V. I. (2013). Predictors of physical intimate partner violence in the lives of young women: Victimization, perpetration, and bidirectional violence. Violence and Victims, 28(1), 103–121. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.28.1.103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raubenheimer, J. (2004). An item selection procedure to maximize scale reliability and validity. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 30(4), 59–64.
   Google Scholar
• Raykov, T. (1997). Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21(2), 173–184. doi:10.1177/01466216970212006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roach, A. R., Browden, R., & Frazier, T. (1981). The marital satisfaction scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 537–546. doi:10.2307/351755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez Aragón, R. (2009). Expectativas, percepción de estabilidad y estrategias de mantenimiento en las relaciones amorosas [Expectations, perception of stability, and maintenance strategies in loving relationships]. Enseñanza e investigación en psicología, 14(2), 229–243.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez Aragón, R., & Díaz Loving, R. (2003). Patrones y estilos de comunicación de la pareja: Diseño de un inventario [Development of a couple communication style inventory]. Anales de psicología, 19(2), 257–277.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Fuentes, M. D., & Sierra, J. C. (2015). Sexual satisfaction in a heterosexual and homosexual Spanish sample: The role of socio-demographic characteristics, health indicators, and relational factors. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 30(2), 226–242. doi:10.1080/14681994.2014.978275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos-Iglesias, P., Vallejo-Medina, P., & Sierra, J. C. (2009). Propiedades psicométricas de una versión breve de la Escala de Ajuste Diádico en muestras españolas [Psychometric properties of a short version of the dyadic adjustment scale in Spanish samples]. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 9(3), 501–517.
   Google Scholar
• Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38(1), 15–28. doi:10.2307/350547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touliatos, J., Perlmutter, B. F., & Holden, G. W. (2001). Handbook of family measurement techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1–10. doi:10.1007/bf02291170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twenge, J. M., Campbell, W. K., & Foster, C. A. (2003). Parenthood and marital satisfaction: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 65, 574–583. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00574.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbano-Contreras, A., Iglesias-García, M. T., & Martínez-González, R. A. (2017). Development and validation of the Satisfaction in couple relationship scale (SCR). Contemporary Family Therapy, 39(1), 54–61. doi:10.1007/s10591-016-9400-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–69. doi:10.1177/109442810031002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velicer, W. F., & Fava, J. L. (1998). Effects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery. Psychological Methods, 3(2), 231–251. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.3.2.231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar