1,311
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorials

How Have Other Journals Compared to “The Top Seven” Journals in Family Social Science with Respect to LGBT-Related Research and Reviews? A Comment on “A Content Analysis of LGBT Research in Top Family Journals 2000–2015”? An Editorial Analysis

&

References

  • Allen, D. (2015). More heat than light: A critical assessment of the same-sex parenting literature, 1995–2013. Marriage & Family Review, 51, 154–182.
  • Allen, K. R. (2016). Feminist theory in family studies: History, reflection, and critique. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 8, 207–224.
  • Allen, S. H., & Mendez, S. N. (2018). Hegemonic heteronormativity: Toward a new era of queer family theory. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 10, 70–86.
  • Berkowitz, D. (2009). Theorizing lesbian and gay parenting: Past, present, and future scholarship. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 1, 117–132.
  • Bong, S. A. (2011). Negotiating resistance/resilience through the nexus of spirituality-sexuality of same-sex partnerships in Malaysia and Singapore. Marriage & Family Review, 47, 648–665.
  • Cameron, P., & Cameron, K. (2012). Re-examining Evelyn Hooker: Setting the record straight with comments on Schumm’s (2012) reanalysis. Marriage & Family Review, 48, 491–523.
  • Cameron, P., Cameron, K., & Proctor, K. (2017). Children of homosexuals more apt to become homosexual and experience parental molestation: Surveys over three decades. Marriage & Family Review, 53, 429–433.
  • Cao, H., Mills-Koonce, R., Wood, C., & Fine, M. A. (2016). Identity transformation during the transition to parenthood among same-sex couples: An ecological, stress-strategy-adaptation perspective. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 8, 30–59.
  • Chrisler, A. J. (2017). Understanding parent reactions to coming out as lesbian, gay, or bisexual: A theoretical framework. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 9, 165–181.
  • Cohen, P. N. (2011). Homogamy unmodified. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 3, 47–51.
  • Connidis, I. A. (2012). Interview and memoir: Complementary narratives on the family ties of gay adults. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 4, 105–121.
  • Doucet, A., & Lee, R. (2014). Fathering, feminism(s), gender, and sexualities: Connections, tensions, and new pathways. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 6, 355–373.
  • Edwards, M. R. (2011). Influence of social support on gay men living with HIV. Marriage & Family Review, 47, 265–288.
  • Farr, R. H., Tasker, F., & Goldberg, A. E. (2016). Theory in highly cited studies of sexual minority parent families: Variations and implications. Journal of Homosexuality, 64, 1143–1179.
  • Few-Demo, A. L. (2014). Intersectionality as the “new” critical approach in feminist family studies: Evolving racial/ethnic feminisms and critical race theories. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 6, 169–183.
  • Few-Demo, A. L., Humble, A. M., Curran, M. A., & Lloyd, S. A. (2016). Queer theory, intersectionality, and LGBT-parent families: Transformative critical pedagogy in family theory. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 8, 74–94.
  • Fuller, K. A. (2017). Interpersonal acceptance-rejection theory: Application to lesbian, gay, and bisexual persons. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 9, 507–520.
  • Galvin, K. M., & Braithwaite, D. O. (2014). Theory and research from the communication field: Discourses that constitute and reflect families. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 6, 97–111.
  • Glennon, B. (2012). Heterosexual parents of gay and lesbian individuals: Social interaction issues. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 4, 332–353.
  • Goldberg, A. E. (2013). “Doing” and “undoing” gender: The meaing and division of housework in same-sex couples. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 5, 85–104.
  • Holman, E. G. (2018). Theoretical extensions of minority stress theory for sexual minority individuals in the workplace: A cross-contextual understanding of minority stress processes. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 10, 165–180.
  • Knapp, S. J. (2009). Critical theorizing: Enhancing theoretical rigor in family research. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 1, 133–145.
  • Kulik, L. (2011). Developments in spousal power relations: Are we moving toward equality?. Marriage & Family Review, 47, 419–435.
  • Lauer, S., & Yodanis, C. (2010). The deinstitutionalization of marriage revisited: A new institutional approach to marriage. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2, 58–72.
  • McGuire, J. K., Catalpa, J. M., Lacey, V., & Kuvalanka, K. A. (2016). Ambiguous loss as a framework for interpreting gender transitions in families. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 8, 373–385.
  • McGuire, J. K., Kuvalanka, K. A., Catalpa, J. M., & Toomey, R. B. (2016). Transfamily theory: How the presence of trans* family members informs gender development in families. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 8, 60–73.
  • Negy, C., Pearte, C., & Lacefield, K. (2013). Young adults’ attitudes toward polygamous marriage as a function of gender, attitudes toward same-sex marriage, and other sociopersonality constructs. Marriage & Family Review, 49, 51–82.
  • Oswald, R. F. (2016). Theorizing LGBT-parent families: An introduction to the special collection. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 8, 7–9.
  • Rosik, C. H. (2014). Same-sex marriage and the boundaries of diversity: Will marriage and family therapy remain inclusive of religious and social conservatives?. Marriage & Family Review, 50, 714–737.
  • Schlesinger, B. (2007). Canada and family life. Marriage & Family Review, 41, 261–279.
  • Schumm, W. R. (2010). Comparative relationship stability of lesbian mother and heterosexual mother families: A review of evidence. Marriage & Family Review, 46, 499–509.
  • Schumm, W. R. (2012a). Reviewing the reviews. Marriage & Family Review, 48, 415–417.
  • Schumm, W. R. (2012b). Re-examining a landmark research study: A teaching editorial. Marriage & Family Review, 48, 465–489.
  • Schumm, W. R., & Crawford, D. W. (2018a). (How) does a literature review matter?. Evaluating the quality of literature reviews in the social sciences. Working paper, School of Family Studies & Human Services, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506–1403.
  • Schumm, W. R., & Crawford, D. W. (2018b). Can social desirability be detected statistically at the macro-sociological levels?. Working paper, School of Family Studies & Human Services, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506–1403.
  • Schumm, W. R., Crawford, D. W., Childs, T., Ateeq, A. B., Koochel, E. E., & Alshalan, T. M. (2017). Reply to Cameron et al.: Mistakes were made. Can they be corrected?. Marriage & Family Review, 53, 434–443.
  • Sharp, E. A., & Weaver, S. E. (2015). Feeling like feminist frauds: Theorizing feminist accountability in feminist family studies research in a neoliberal, postfeminist context. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 7, 299–320.
  • Skogrand, L., Mendez, E., & Higginbotham, B. (2013). Stepfamily education: Case study of two lesbian couples. Marriage & Family Review, 49, 504–519.
  • Sprey, J. (2009). Institutionalization of the family and marriage: Questioning their cognitive and relational realities. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 1, 4–19.
  • Sutphin, S. T. (2010). Social exchange theory and the division of household labor in same-sex couples. Marriage & Family Review, 46, 191–206.
  • Van Eeden-Moorefield, B. (2018). Introduction to the special issue: Intersectional variations in the experiences of queer families. Family Relations, 67, 7–11.
  • Van Eeden-Moorefield, B., Few-Demo, A. L., Benson, K., Bible, J., & Lummer, S. (2018). A content analysis of LGBT research in top family journals 2000–2015. Journal of Family Issues, 39, 1374–1395.
  • Whitton, S. W., & Buzzella, B. A. (2012). Using relationship education programs with same-sex couples: A preliminary evaluation of program utility and needed modifications. Marriage & Family Review, 48, 667–688.
  • Widiss, D. A. (2016). Legal recognition of same-sex relationships: New possibilities for research on the role of marriage law in household labor allocation. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 8, 10–29.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.