Numerical investigation and improvement strategy of flow characteristics inside supersonic separator

References

• Dorao, C.A.; Fernandino, M. (2011) Simulation of transients in natural gas pipelines. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 3 (1): 255–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najibi, H.; Taghavi, N. (2011) Effect of different parameters on optimum design for high pressure natural gas trunk-lines. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 3 (4): 547–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Economides, M.J.; Oligney, R.E.; Lewis, P.E. (2012) U.S. natural gas in 2011 and beyond. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 8: 2–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y.; Qin, C.; Xing, H.; Liu, P. (2013) Experimental research on performance response of domestic gas cookers to variable natural gas constituents. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 10: 41–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahadori, A.; Vuthaluru, H.B. (2009) A novel correlation for estimation of hydrate forming condition of natural gases. Journal of Natural Gas Chemistry, 18 (4): 453–457.
   Google Scholar
• Yeo, Z.Y.; Chew, T.L.; Zhu, P.W.; Mohamed, A.R.; Chai, S.-P. (2012) Conventional processes and membrane technology for carbon dioxide removal from natural gas: A review. Journal of Natural Gas Chemistry, 21 (3): 282–298.
   Google Scholar
• Machado, P.B.; Monteiro, J.G.M.; Medeiros, J.L.; Epsom, H.D.; Araujo, O.Q.F. (2012) Supersonic separation in onshore natural gas dew point plant. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 6: 43–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Netusil, M.; Ditl, P. (2011) Comparison of three methods for natural gas dehydration. Journal of Natural Gas Chemistry, 20 (5): 471–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schinkelshoek, P.; Epsom, H. Supersonic gas conditioning-low pressure drop twister for NGL recovery. Offshore Technology Conference. Houston, Texas, 2006:1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Karimi, A.; Abdi, M.A. Selective removal of water from supercritical natural gas. SPE Gas Technology Symposium. Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 2006:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Betting, M.; Epson, H. (2007) Supersonic separator gains market acceptance: High velocities make a unique separator and dewpointer. World Oil, 228 (4): 197–200.
   Google Scholar
• Rajaee Shooshtari, S.H.; Shahsavand, A. (2013) Reliable prediction of condensation rates for purification of natural gas via supersonic separators. Separation and Purification Technology, 116: 458–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alferov, V.I.; Baguirov, L.; Feygln, V.I.; Arbatov, A.E. Method of and apparatus for the separation of components of gas mixtures and liquefaction of a gas. US, Patent, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Vadim, A.; Lev, B.; Leonard, D.; Vladimir, F.; Salavat, I.; John, L. (2005) Supersonic nozzle efficiently separates natural gas components. Oil & Gas Journal, 103: 53–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betting, M.; Holten, T.V.; Amsterdam, J.H. Supersonic separator apparatus and method. US, Patent, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H.W.; Liu, Z.L.; Feng, Y.X.; Gu, K.Y.; Yan, T.M. (2005) Characteristics of a supersonic swirling dehydration system of natural gas. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 13 (1): 9–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriqitai, H.J.; Duan, R.; Wu, M. (2014) Performance of dual-throat supersonic separation device with porous wall structure. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 22 (4): 370–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haghighi, M.; Hawboldt, K.A.; Abedinzadegan Abdi, M. (2015) Supersonic gas separators: review of latest developments. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 27 (Part 1): 109–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prast, B.; Lammers, B.; Betting, M. CFD for supersonic gas processing. Fifth International Conference on CFD in the Process Industries CSIRO, Melbourne, Australia, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Bian, J.; Jiang, W.; Teng, L.; Liu, Y.; Wang, S.; Deng, Z. (2016) Structure improvements and numerical simulation of supersonic separators. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 110 (Supplement C): 214–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malyshkina, M.M. (2010) The procedure for investigation of the efficiency of purification of natural gases in a supersonic separator. High Temperature, 48 (2): 244–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malyshkina, M.M. (2008) The structure of gasdynamic flow in a supersonic separator of natural gas. High Temperature, 46 (1): 69–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahsavand, A.; Mahmoodzadeh, V.B.; Ghanbari, M.M. Non isentropic performance of supersonic separators. Conference Non Isentropic Performance of Supersonic Separators, Kermanshah, Iran, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Jassim, E.; Abdi, M.A.; Muzychka, Y. (2008) Computational fluid dynamics study for flow of natural gas through high-pressure supersonic nozzles: part1. Real Gas Effects and Shockwave. Petroleum Science and Technology., 26: 1757–1772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jassim, E.; Abdi, M.A.; Muzychka, Y. (2008) Computational fluid dynamics study for flow of natural gas through high-pressure supersonic nozzles: part2. Nozzle Geometry and Vorticity. Petroleum Science and Technology., 26 (2008): 1773–1785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi, A.; Abdi, M.A. (2009) Selective dehydration of high-pressure natural gas using supersonic nozzles. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 48 (1): 560–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, C.; Cao, X.W.; Yang, Y.; Li, W.L. (2012) Numerical simulation of natural gas flows in diffusers for supersonic separators. Energy, 37 (1): 195–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, C.; Cao, X.W.; Yang, Y. (2011) Swirling flow of natural gas in supersonic separators. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 50 (7): 644–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, C.; Cao, X.W.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, J. (2012) Evaluation of natural gas dehydration in supersonic swirling separators applying the Discrete Particle Method. Advanced Powder Technology, 23 (2): 228–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, X.W.; Yang, W. (2015) The dehydration performance evaluation of a new supersonic swirling separator. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 27 (Part 3): 1667–1676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, X.W.; Yang, W. (2015) Numerical simulation of binary-gas condensation characteristics in supersonic nozzles. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 25: 197–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y.; Cao, X.W.; Wang, S.; Feng, Y. (2014) Theoretical and numerical analysis on pressure recovery of supersonic separators for natural gas dehydration. Applied Energy, 132: 248–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y.; Cao, X.W.; Wang, S.; Feng, Y. (2014) Numerical simulation of real gas flows in natural gas supersonic separation processing. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 21: 829–836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, D.; Yan, H.; Panaras, A.G.; Zheltovodov, A. (2003) Advances in CFD prediction of shock wave turbulent boundary layer interactions. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 39 (2–3): 121–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkov, A.N.; Tsirkunov, Y.M.; Oesterlé, B. (2005) Numerical simulation of a supersonic gas–solid flow over a blunt body: the role of inter-particle collisions and two-way coupling effects. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 31 (12): 1244–1275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deck, S.; Duveau, P.; d’Espiney, P.; Guillen, P. (2002) Development and application of Spalart–Allmaras one equation turbulence model to three-dimensional supersonic complex configurations. Aerospace Science and Technology, 6 (3): 171–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih, T.H.; Liou, W.W.; Shabbir, A.; Zhu, J. (1995) New k-ε eddy-viscosity model for high Reynolds number turbulent flows-model development and validation. Computers & Fluids, 24: 227–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escue, A.; Cui, J. (2010) Comparison of turbulence models in simulating swirling pipe flows. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 34 (10): 2840–2849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gang, Z.; Jiadao, W.; Haosheng, C.; Darong, C. (2009) Optimized design of the contraction in a minitype high-speed water-tunnel. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 14 (4): 513–521.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X.W.; Liu, Z.L.; B, L.L. (2014) Numerical and experimental study on swirler-backplaced supersonic separator. Cryogenics, 1 (197): 37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Bao, Y.; Zhou, D.; Huang, C.; Wu, Q.; Chen, X.-Q. (2011) Numerical prediction of aerodynamic characteristics of prismatic cylinder by finite element method with Spalart–Allmaras turbulence model. Computers & Structures, 89 (3–4): 325–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menter, F.R. (1994) Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications. AIAA Journal, 32 (8): 1598–1605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, M.M.; Launder, B.E. (1978) Ground effects on pressure fluctuations in the atmospheric boundary layer. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 86: 491–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Launder, B.E. (1989) Second-moment closure: present... And Future? International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 10 (4): 282–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Launder, B.E.; Reece, G.J.; Rodi, W. (April1975) Progress in the development of a Reynolds-stress turbulence closure. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 68 (3): 537–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Launder, B.E.; Shima, N. (1989) Second-moment closure for the near-wall sublayer: development and application. AIAA Journal, 27 (10): 1319–1325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar