Micro-CFD modelling of ultrafiltration bio-fouling

References

• Gollub, J. Research in fluid dynamics: meeting national needs. Theor. Appl. Mech. 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Teng, J. T.; Chu, J. C.; Liu, C.; Xu, T.; Lien, Y. F.; Cheng, J. H.; Huang, S.; Jin, S.; Dang, T.; Zhang, C.; et al. Fluid dynamics in microchannels. Fluid Dyn. Comput. Model. Appl. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• de Aguiar, I. B.; Schroën, K. Microfluidics used as a tool to understand and optimize membrane filtration processes. Membr. Oct 2020, 10(11), 316. doi:10.3390/MEMBRANES10110316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcos, B.; Moresoli, C.; Skorepova, J.; Vaughan, B. CFD modeling of a transient hollow fiber ultrafiltration system for protein concentration. J. Memb. Sci. 2009, 337(1–2), 136–144. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.03.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linkhorst, J.; Beckmann, T.; Go, D.; Kuehne, A. J. C.; Wessling, M. Microfluidic colloid filtration. Sci. Rep. Mar 61, 2016, 6(1), 1–8. DOI: 10.1038/srep22376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donato, L.; Garofalo, A.; Drioli, E.; Alharbi, O.; Aljlil, S. A.; Criscuoli, A.; Algieri, C. Improved performance of vacuum membrane distillation in desalination with zeolite membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. Apr. 2020, 237, 116376. DOI: 10.1016/J.SEPPUR.2019.116376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, W.; Ngo, H. H.; Li, J. A mini-review on membrane fouling. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 122, 27–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pertile, C.; Zanini, M.; Baldasso, C.; Andrade, M. Z.; Cristinatessaro, I. Evaluation of membrane microfiltration fouling in landfill leachate treatment. Rev. Mater. 2018, 23(1). DOI: 10.1590/S1517-707620170001.0297.
   Google Scholar
• Kallus, S.; Condre, J.-M.; Hahn, A.; Golemme, G.; Algieri, C.; Dieudonné, P.; Timmins, P.; Ramsay, J. D. F. Colloidal zeolites and zeolite membranes. J. Mater. Chem. Nov 2002, 12(11), 3343–3350. DOI: 10.1039/B204171P.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, W.; Wang, Z.; Song, P. The cake layer formation in the early stage of filtration in MBR: Mechanism and model. J. Memb. Sci. Aug 2018, 559, 75–86. DOI: 10.1016/J.MEMSCI.2018.04.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gov, N.; Zilman, A. G.; Safran, S. Hydrodynamics of confined membranes. Phys. Rev. E - Stat. Phys. Plasmas Fluids Relat. Interdiscip. Top. 2004, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.011104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pak, A.; Mohammadi, T.; Hosseinalipour, S. M.; Allahdini, V. CFD modeling of porous membranes. Desalination. 2008, 222(1–3), 482–488. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohaus, J.; Perez, Y. M.; Wessling, M. What are the microscopic events of colloidal membrane fouling? J. Memb. Sci. May 2018, 553, 90–98. DOI: 10.1016/J.MEMSCI.2018.02.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirillo, A. I.; Tomaiuolo, G.; Guido, S. Membrane fouling phenomena in microfluidic systems: From technical challenges to scientific opportunities. Micromachines. Jul 2021, 12(7), 820. doi:10.3390/MI12070820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, T. The effect of cake and fibre properties on flux declines in hollow-fibre microfiltration membranes. J. Memb. Sci. Aug 2001, 189(2), 167–178. doi:10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00412-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, Z. Protein separation using ultrafiltration — An example of multi-scale complex systems. China Particuol. 2005, 3(6), 343–348. DOI:10.1016/s1672-2515(07)60213-9.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.; Clark, M. M. Modeling of flux decline during crossflow ultrafiltration of colloidal suspensions. J. Memb. Sci. Oct 1998, 149(2), 181–202. doi:10.1016/S0376-7388(98)00177-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jianxin, L.; Zhijun, L.; Xiaofei, X.; Wei, W.; Xiaojuan, W.; Fengxia, L. Numerical investigation of the membrane fouling during microfiltration of semiconductor wastewater. Desalin. Water Treat. 2016, 57(11), 4756–4768. DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2014.996777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinther, F.; Jönsson, A. S. Modelling of optimal back-shock frequency in hollow fibre ultrafiltration membranes I: Computational fluid dynamics. J. Memb. Sci. 2016, 506, 130–136. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.12.061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uppu, A.; Chaudhuri, A.; Prasad Das, S. Numerical modeling of particulate fouling and cake-enhanced concentration polarization in roto-dynamic reverse osmosis filtration systems. Desalination. Oct 2019, 468, 114053. DOI: 10.1016/J.DESAL.2019.06.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geissler, S.; Werner, U. Dynamic model of crossflow microfiltration in flat-channel systems under laminar flow conditions. Filtr. Sep. 1995, 32(6), 533–537. DOI:10.1016/S0015-1882(97)84108-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhuang, L.; Guo, H.; Dai, G.; Liang Xu, Z. Effect of the inlet manifold on the performance of a hollow fiber membrane module-A CFD study. J. Memb. Sci. Mar 2017, 526, 73–93. DOI: 10.1016/J.MEMSCI.2016.12.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, S. E.; Lin, Y. C.; Hwang, K. J.; Cheng, T. W.; Tung, K. L. High-efficiency hollow fiber arrangement design to enhance filtration performance by CFD simulation. Chem. Eng. Process. - Process Intensif. Mar 2018, 125, 87–96. DOI: 10.1016/J.CEP.2018.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doering, C. R. The 3D navier-stokes problem. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2009, 41(1), 109–128. DOI:10.1146/annurev.fluid.010908.165218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryll, A.; Ślęzak, A. The mathematical model of concentration polarization coefficient in membrane transport and volume flows. J. Biol. Phys. 2017, 43(1), 31. DOI:10.1007/S10867-016-9432-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curcio, S.; Petrosino, F.; Morrone, M.; De Luca, G. Interactions between proteins and the membrane surface in multiscale modeling of organic fouling. J. Chem. Inf. Model. Sep 2018, 58(9), 1815–1827. doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derjaguin, B. V.; Churaev, N. V.; Muller, V. M.; Derjaguin, B. V.; Churaev, N. V.; Muller, V. M. Chapter 8 - The Derjaguin—Landau—Verwey—Overbeek (DLVO) theory of stability of lyophobic colloids. In Surface Forces; Springer: Boston, MA, 1987; pp293–310. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-6639-4_8.
   Google Scholar
• Petrosino, F.; Hallez, Y.; De Luca, G.; Curcio, S. Osmotic pressure and transport coefficient in ultrafiltration: A monte carlo study using quantum surface charges. Chem. Eng. Sci. Oct 2020, 224, 115762. DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2020.115762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Luca, G.; Bisignano, F.; Paone, F.; Curcio, S. Multi-scale modeling of protein fouling in ultrafiltration process. J. Memb. Sci. 2014, 452, 400–414. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.09.061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrosino, F.; Curcio, S.; Chakraborty, S.; De Luca, G. Enzyme immobilization on polymer membranes : A quantum and molecular mechanics study. Comput. Sci. Eng. 2019, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Suki, A.; Fane, A. G.; Fell, C. J. D. Flux decline in protein ultrafiltration. J. Memb. Sci. 1984, 21(3), 269–283. DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(00)80218-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Bella, G.; Di Trapani, D. A brief review on the resistance-in-series Model in Membrane Bioreactors (MBRs). Membr. Feb 2019, 9(2), 24. doi:10.3390/MEMBRANES9020024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav, S.; Shire, S. J.; Kalonia, D. S. Viscosity analysis of high concentration bovine serum albumin aqueous solutions. Pharm. Res. Aug 2011, 28(8), 1973–1983. doi:10.1007/S11095-011-0424-7/FIGURES/8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar