Impact of ambiguity tolerance and tertiary education on professional judgment

References

• Agoglia, C. P., Doupnik, T. S., & Tsakumis, G. T. (2011). Principles-based versus rules-based accounting standards: The Influence of standard precision and audit committee strength on financial reporting decisions. The Accounting Review, 86(3), 747–767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, D., & Jermakowicz, E. (2006). A true and fair view of the principles/rules debate. Abacus, 42(2), 132–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, S. M., & Schwartz, A. H. (1992). Intolerance of ambiguity and depression: A cognitive vulnerability factor linked to hopelessness. Social Cognition, 10(3), 271–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. Oxford: Grune & Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Ausubel, D. P. (2000). The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Auyeung, P., & Sands, J. (1996). A cross cultural study of the learning style of accounting students. Accounting and Finance, 36(2), 261–274.
   Google Scholar
• Baboukardos, D., & Rimmel, G. (2014). Goodwill under IFRS: Relevance and disclosures in an unfavorable environment. Accounting Forum, 38(1), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Barth, M. E., Landsman, W. R., & Lang, M. H. (2008). International accounting standards and accounting quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(3), 467–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begley, T. M., & Boyd, D. P. (1987). Psychological characteristics associated with performance in entrepreneurial firms and smaller businesses. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(1), 79–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benston, G. J., Bromwich, M., & Wagenhofer, A. (2006). Principles- versus rules-based accounting standards: The FASB’s standard setting strategy. Abacus, 42(2), 165–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birt, J., Sherry, C., Ling, A., Fisher, G., & Lee, J. (2004). Expectations of learning: A New Zealand perspective. Working Paper 7 (Centre for Research in International Education).
   Google Scholar
• Boland, G., Sugahara, S., Opdecam, E., & Everaert, P. (2011). The impact of cultural factors on students’ learning style preferences: A global comparison between Japan, Australia and Belgium. Asian Review of Accounting, 19(3), 243–265.
   Google Scholar
• Bonk, C. J., & Smith, G. S. (1998). Alternative instructional strategies for creative and critical thinking in the accounting curriculum. Journal of Accounting Education, 16(2), 261–293.
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury, M. E., & Schröder, L. B. (2012). The content of accounting standards: Principles versus rules. The British Accounting Review, 44(1), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budner, S. (1962). Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. Journal of Personality, 30(1), 29–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. E., & Lewis, W. F. (1991). Using cases in accounting classes. Issues in Accounting Education, 6(2), 276–283.
   Google Scholar
• Carmona, S., & Trombetta, M. (2008). On the global acceptance of IAS/IFRS accounting standards: The logic and implications of the principles-based system. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27(6), 455–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caulfield, M., Andolsek, K., Grbic, D., & Roskovensky, L. (2014). Ambiguity tolerance of students matriculating to US medical schools. Academic Medicine, 89(11), 1526–1532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, E., Gavious, I., & Lev, B. (2017). The positive externalities of IFRS R&D capitalization: Enhanced voluntary disclosure. Review of Accounting Studies, 22(2), 677–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheong, C. S., Kim, S., & Zurbruegg, R. (2010). The impact of IFRS on financial analysts’ forecast accuracy in the Asia-Pacific region. Pacific Accounting Review, 22(2), 124–146.
   Google Scholar
• Churyk, N. T., Reinstein, A., & Gross, G. M. (2010). Raleigh building products: A teaching case that highlights the differences between IFRS and US GAAP. Journal of Accounting Education, 28(2), 128–137.
   Google Scholar
• Coetzee, S. A., & Schmulian, A. (2012). A critical analysis of the pedagogical approach employed in an introductory course to IFRS. Issues in Accounting Education, 27(1), 83–100.
   Google Scholar
• Conrod, J. E. D. (2010). IFRS within the multi-GAAP Canadian reality: A teaching and learning imperative for intermediate financial accounting. Accounting Perspectives, 9(1), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, B. J. (2004). The enigma of the Chinese learner. Accounting Education, 13(3), 289–310.
   Google Scholar
• Curley, S. P., Yates, J. F., & Abrams, R. A. (1986). Psychological sources of ambiguity avoidance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38(2), 230–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doupnik, T. S., & Richter, M. (2003). Interpretation of uncertainty expressions: A cross-national study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(1), 15–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnerty, J. D. (1988). Financial engineering in corporate finance: An overview. Financial Management, 17(4), 14–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenkel-Brunswik, E. (1949). Intolerance of ambiguity as an emotional and perceptual personality variable. Journal of Personality, 18(1), 108–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedland, N., & Keinan, G. (1991). The effects of stress, ambiguity tolerance, and trait anxiety on the formation of causal relationships. Journal of Research in Personality, 25(1), 88–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., & Gunter, B. (1993). Corporate assessment: Auditing a company’s personality. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., & Ribchester, T. (1995). Tolerance of ambiguity: A review of the concept, its measurement and applications. Current Psychology, 14(3), 179–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geller, G., Faden, R. R., & Levine, D. M. (1990). Tolerance for ambiguity among medical students: Implications for their selection, training and practice. Social Science & Medicine, 31(5), 619–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul, F. A. (1984). The joint and moderating role of personality and cognitive style on decision making. The Accounting Review, 59(2), 264–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul, F. A. (1986). Tolerance for ambiguity, auditors’ opinions and their effects on decision making. Accounting and Business Research, 16(62), 99–105.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, J., Roberts, M., Monrouxe, L., & Mattick, K. (2015). Medical student and junior doctors’ tolerance of ambiguity: Development of a new scale. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 20(1), 113–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P., Freeman, M., Watty, K., Birt, J., & Tyler, J. (2016). Accounting learning standards. AFAANZ. Retrieved from https://www.afaanz.org/sites/default/files/uploaded-content/website-content/new-teachingand-learning-standards-final-2016_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Harding, N., & Ren, M. (2007). The importance in accounting of ambiguity tolerance at the national level: Evidence from Australia and China. Asian Review of Accounting, 15(1), 6–24.
   Google Scholar
• Herbert, W. E., Tsegba, I. N., Ohanele, A. C., & Anyahara, I. O. (2013). Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): Insights from Nigerian academics and practitioners. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 4(6), 121–135.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values (Abridged ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, N. (2003). An experiential leadership approach for teaching tolerance for ambiguity. Journal of Education for Business, 79(1), 52–55.
   Google Scholar
• IAESB. (2017). Handbook of international education pronouncement. International Accounting Education Standards Board.
   Google Scholar
• IASB. (1998). IAS 37: Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets. International Accounting Standards Board.
   Google Scholar
• IASB. (2003). IAS 17: Leases. International Accounting Standards Board.
   Google Scholar
• IASB. (2014). IFRS 15: Revenue from contracts with customers. International Accounting Standards Board.
   Google Scholar
• IASB. (2017). Analysis of use of IFRS standards around the world. IFRS Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.ifrs.org/use-around-the-world/use-of-ifrs-standards-by-jurisdiction/#analysis
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, B. E., & Sarin, R. K. (1988). Modeling ambiguity in decisions under uncertainty. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 265–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimmel, P. (1995). A framework for incorporating critical thinking into accounting education. Journal of Accounting Education, 13(3), 299–318.
   Google Scholar
• Kirton, M. J. (1981). A reanalysis of two scales of tolerance of ambiguity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45(4), 407–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennard, A. (2007). Stewardship and the objectives of financial statements: A comment on IASB’s preliminary views on an improved conceptual framework for financial reporting: The objective of financial reporting and qualitative characteristics of decision-useful financial reporting information. Accounting in Europe, 4(1), 51–66.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, A. P. (1970). Revised scale for ambiguity tolerance: Reliability and validity. Psychological Reports, 26(3), 791–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maines, C. L. A., Bartov, E., Fairfield, P., Hirst, D. E., Iannaconi, T. E., Mallett, R., … Vincent, L. (2003). Evaluating concepts-based vs. rules-based approaches to standard setting. Accounting Horizons, 17(1), 73–89.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (1992). Thinking, problem solving, cognition (2nd ed.). New York: WH Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2002a). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 226–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2002b). The promise of educational psychology. volume 2: Teaching for meaningful learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Wittrock, M. C. (1996). Problem-solving transfer. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 47–62). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• McGhee, W., Shields, M. D., & Birnberg, J. G. (1978). The effects of personality on a subject’s information processing. The Accounting Review, 53(3), 681–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeough, A., Lupart, J. L., & Marini, A. (1995). Teaching for transfer: Fostering generalization in learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• McLain, D. L. (1993). The MSTAT-I: A new measure of an individual’s tolerance for ambiguity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(1), 183–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLain, D. L., Kefallonitis, E., & Armani, K. (2015, April). Ambiguity tolerance in organizations: Definitional clarification and perspectives on future research. Frontiers in Psychology. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neel, M. (2017). Accounting comparability and economic outcomes of mandatory IFRS adoption. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(1), 658–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsen, K. (2008). On the verge of an academic revolution: How IFRS is affecting accounting Education. Journal of Accountancy, 206(6), 82–85.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, R. W. (1975). Measurement of ambiguity tolerance. Journal of Personality Assessment, 39(6), 607–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate propositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners. Science Education, 86(4), 548–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nutt, P. C. (1993). Flexible decision styles and the choices of top executives. Journal of Management Studies, 30(5), 695–721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patro, A., & Gupta, V. K. (2012). Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in accounting curriculum in India: An empirical study. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2, 227–236.
   Google Scholar
• Penno, M. C. (2008). Rules and accounting: Vagueness in conceptual frameworks. Accounting Horizons, 22(3), 339–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phye, G. D. (1997). Handbook of academic learning: Construction of knowledge. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pries, F., & Baker, R. (2010). A proposal for teaching introductory and intermediate accounting in an environment of International Financial Reporting Standards and Generally Accepted Accounting Principles for private enterprises. Accounting Perspectives, 9(1), 15–27.
   Google Scholar
• Psaros, J. (2007). Do principles-based accounting standards lead to biased financial reporting? An Australian experiment. Accounting & Finance, 47(3), 527–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psaros, J., & Trotman, K. T. (2004). The impact of the type of accounting standards on preparers’ judgments. Abacus, 40(1), 76–93.
   Google Scholar
• Roskin, R., & Margerison, C. (1983). The effectiveness of some measures of managerial effectiveness. Human Relations, 36(10), 865–882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schipper, K. (2003). Principles-based accounting standards. Accounting Horizons, 17(1), 61–72.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, D. R., & Hendrick, C. (1974). Dogmatism and tolerance for ambiguity as determinants of differential reactions to cognitive inconsistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29(5), 601–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuell, T. J. (1990). Phases of meaningful learning. Review of Educational Research, 60(4), 531–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starko, A. J. (2010). Creativity in the classroom: Schools of curious delight (4th ed.). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Steenkamp, L. P., & Wessels, P. L. (2014). An analysis of the tolerance for ambiguity among accounting students. International Business and Economics Research Journal, 13(2), 275–288.
   Google Scholar
• Sugahara, S., & Boland, G. (2010). The role of cultural factors in the learning style preferences of accounting students: A comparative study between Japan and Australia. Accounting Education, 19(3), 235–255.
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, J. (1993). Tolerance for ambiguity, uncertainty audit qualifications and bankers’ perceptions. Psychological Reports, 72(3), 915–919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, E., & Zeelenberg, M. (2003). The discounting of ambiguous information in economic decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16(5), 341–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wüstemann, J., & Wüstemann, S. (2010). Why consistency of accounting standards matters: A contribution to the rules-versus-principles debate in financial reporting. Abacus, 46(1), 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zebda, A. (1991). The problem of ambiguity and vagueness in accounting. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 3(1), 117–145.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, H., Rich, K. T., Michenzi, A. R., & Cherubini, J. (2011). User-oriented IFRS education in introductory accounting at U.S. academic institutions: Current status and influencing factors. Issues in Accounting Education, 26(4), 725–750.
   Google Scholar