Exploring the social reporting practices of public schools: survey and cluster analysis of the Italian educational systemFootnote^*

* Although the results of this research paper are a team effort, Domenico Raucci wrote Sections 1; 2; 3; 5; Domenico Raucci and Stefano Agostinone wrote Section 3.1; Domenico Raucci and Lara Tarquinio wrote Section 6; Stefano Agostinone wrote Section 4.2; while all authors wrote Sections 4.1 and 4.3 with an equal contribution.

References

• Adams, C. A., & Frost, G. R. (2008). Integrating sustainability reporting into management practices. Accounting Forum, 32(4), 288–302.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, C. R., & Bettner, M. S. (1997). Interpretative and critical research in accounting: A commentary on its absence from mainstream accounting research. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 8(4), 293–310.
   Google Scholar
• Bebbington, J., Brown, J., Frame, B., & Thomson, I. (2007). Theorizing engagement: The potential of a critical dialogic approach. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 20(3), 356–381.
   Google Scholar
• Borgonovi, E., Fattore, G., & Longo, F. (2008). Management delle istituzioni pubbliche. Milano: Egea.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. (2007). Analyzing and assessing public accountability. A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 837–868.
   Google Scholar
• Bracci, E. (2006). La scuola dell’autonomia. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
   Google Scholar
• Bracci, E. (2009). Autonomy, responsibility and accountability in the Italian school system. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20(3), 293–312.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, D., & Merrien, F. (1999). Towards a new model of governance for universities? A comparative view. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, J., Jacobs, K., & Laughlin, R. (1999). Comparing schools in the UK and New Zealand: Individualizing and socializing accountabilities and some implications for management control. Management Accounting Research, 10(4), 339–361.
   Google Scholar
• Calinski, T., & Harabasz, J. (1974). A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Communications in Statistics, 3, 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Carnoy, M., Elmore, R., & Siskin, L. S. (2003). The new accountability: High schools and high-stakes testing. New York: Routledge Falemer.
   Google Scholar
• Cerioli, A., & Zani, S. (2007). Analisi dei dati e data mining per le decisioni aziendali. Milano: Giuffrè.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, M. (2004). Accounting by words not numbers: The handmaiden of power in the academy. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15(4–5), 485–512.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, M. (2007). Gender and educational leadership in England: A comparison of secondary headteachers’ views over time. School Leadership and Management, 27(4), 383–399.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, M., James, C., & Fertig, M. (2017). The difference between educational management and educational leadership and the importance of educational responsibility. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1741143217745880
   Google Scholar
• Cowie, M., & Croxford, L. (2007). Intelligent accountability: Sound-bite or sea-change? (Report No. 43). Edinburgh: Centre for Educational Sociology, University of Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Cowie, M., Taylor, D., & Croxford, L. (2007). Tough, intelligent accountability in Scottish secondary schools and the role of standard tables and charts (STACS): A critical appraisal. Scottish Educational Review, 39, 29–50.
   Google Scholar
• Coy, D., Fischer, M., & Gordon, T. (2001). Public accountability: A new paradigm for college and university annual reports. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 12(1), 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., & Leithwood, K. (Eds.). (2007). Successful principal leadership in times of change. An international perspective. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• De Anna, F. (2005). Autonomia e rendicontazione sociale. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, P., Ezzamel, M., Robson, K., & Taylor, M. (1997). The local management of schools initiative: The implementation of formula funding in three English LEAs. London: The Chartered Institute of Management Accountants.
   Google Scholar
• EUROSTAT. (2015). Regions in the European Union. NUTS 2010/EU-27. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Ezzamel, M., Robson, K., Stapleton, P., & McLean, C. (2007). Discourse and institutional change: ‘Giving accounts’ and accountability. Management Accounting Research, 18(2), 150–171.
   Google Scholar
• Figlio, D., & Loeb, S. (2011). School accountability. In E. A. Hanushek, S. J. Machin, & L. Wöbann (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education. Volume 3 (pp. 383–421). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, T., Youngs, H., & Grootenboer, P. (2003). Bureaucratic control or professional autonomy? Performance management in New Zealand schools. School Leadership & Management, 23(1), 91–105.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, F. J. (2014). Survey research methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Galbreath, J. (2011). Are there gender-related influences on corporate sustainability? A study of women on boards of directors. Journal of Management & Organization, 17, 17–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GBS. (2016). La rendicontazione sociale degli istituti scolastici. Documento di ricerca n.13. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R., & Guthrie, J. (1995). Recent environmental disclosure in social statements of Australian public and private sector organisations. Accounting Forum, 19(2–3), 111–127.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, R., Owen, D., & Adams, C. (1996). Accounting and accountability. London: Prentice Hall Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Grogan, M., & Shakeshaft, C. (2011). Women and educational leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L. S., Schwartz, H. L., Stecher, B. M., & Steele, J. L. (2013). Improving accountability through expanded measures of performance. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(4), 453–475.
   Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A., & Raymond, M. E. (2005). Does school accountability lead to improved student performance? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(2), 297–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. (2008). The fourth way of change: Towards an age of inspiration and sustainability. In A. Hargreaves, & M. Fullan (Eds.), Change wars (pp. 11–44). Toronto: Solution Tree.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, D. A. (2004). Strategic planning and Habermasian informed discourse: Reality or rhetoric. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15(4–5), 469–483.
   Google Scholar
• Hooge, E., Burns, T., & Wilkoszewski, H. (2012). Looking beyond the numbers: Stakeholders and multiple school accountability. OECD Education Working Papers, 85, 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Ihantola, E. M., & Kihn, L. A. (2011). Threats to validity and reliability in mixed methods accounting research. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 8(1), 39–58.
   Google Scholar
• INVALSI. (2016). Rilevazioni nazionali degli apprendimenti 2015-2016. Retrieved from http://www.invalsi.it/invalsi/doc_evidenza/2016/07_Rapporto_Prove_INVALSI_2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, B. A., & Levitt, S. (2003). Rotten apples: An investigation of the prevalence and predictors of teacher cheating. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 843–877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. A., & Wichern, D. W. (2002). Applied multivariate statistical analysis. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Karsten, S., Visscher, A. J., Bert Dijkstra, A. N. N. E., & Veenstra, R. (2010). Towards standards for the publication of performance indicators in the public sector: The case of schools. Public Administration, 88(1), 90–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koretz, D. (2015). Adapting educational measurement to the demands of test-based accountability. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspectives, 13(1), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, J. E. (1997). Public sector reform: Rationale, trends, and problems. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Laughlin, R. C. (1987). Accounting systems in organisational contexts: A case for critical theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(5), 479–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K. (2001). School leadership in the context of accountability policies. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4(3), 217–235.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, L. S., Thorne, L., Cecil, L., & LaGore, W. (2013). A research note on standalone corporate social responsibility reports: Signaling or greenwashing? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(4–5), 350–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelon, G., Pilonato, S., & Ricceri, F. (2015). Csr reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33, 59–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MIUR. (2013). Servizio Statistico 2013, Focus Sedi, alunni, classi e dotazioni organiche del personale docente della scuola A.S. 2013/2014. Retrieved from http://hubmiur.pubblica.istruzione.it/alfresco/d/d/workspace/SpacesStore/ceafc890-20eb-4c5f-859b-baed726d22d0/avvio_anno_scolastico2013_2014_10.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mori, E. (2014). La trasparenza delle istituzioni scolastiche attraverso l’uso del web. Azienda Pubblica, 4, 315–346.
   Google Scholar
• Møller, J. (2009). School leadership in an age of accountability: Tensions between managerial and professional accountability. Journal of Educational Change, 10(1), 37–46.
   Google Scholar
• Mussari, R., & Monfardini, P. (2010). Practices of social reporting in public sector and non-profit organizations: An Italian perspective. Public Management Review, 12(4), 487–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, P. T. (2010). The evolution and nature of school accountability in the Singapore education system. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 22(4), 275–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakes, J., Blasi, G., & Rogers, J. (2005). Accountability for adequate and equitable opportunities to learn. In K. A. Sirotnik (Ed.), Holding accountability accountable. What ought to matter in public education (pp. 82–100). NY, London: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Day, J. (2002). Complexity, accountability, and school improvement. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 293–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. ((2017)). Education at a glance 2016: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, O. (2002). A question of trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, O. (2013). Intelligent accountability in education. Oxford Review of Education, 39, 4–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, D. L., Swift, T., & Hunt, K. (2001). Questioning the role of stakeholder engagement, in social and ethical accounting. Auditing and Reporting. Accounting Forum, 25(3), 264–282.
   Google Scholar
• Paletta, A. (2011). Scuole responsabili dei risultati. Bologna: Il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Paletta, A. (2012). Public governance and school performance. Public Management Review, 14(8), 1125–1151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paletta, A., & Bezzina, C. (2016). Governance and leadership in public schools: Opportunities and challenges facing school leaders in Italy. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 15(4), 524–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, L. D., & Gould, G. (1999). Changing public sector accountability: Critiquing new directions. Accounting Forum, 23(2), 109–135.
   Google Scholar
• Pavan, A., & Reginato, E. (2005). Prospettive di accountability ed efficienza nello, Stato italiano. Milano: Giuffrè.
   Google Scholar
• Pollifroni, M. (2007). Public sector social responsibility. Strumenti di rendicontazione etico-sociale per l'azienda pubblica. Milano: Giuffrè.
   Google Scholar
• Previtali, D. (2010). Il bilancio sociale nella scuola. Roma: Edizioni Lavoro.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, K., & Tilt, C. (2016). Board composition and corporate social responsibility: The role of diversity, gender, strategy and decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(2), 327–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raucci, D., Agostinone, S., & Tarquinio, L. (2016). Social reporting in Italian public schools in theory and practice. Review of European Studies, 8(3), 170–186.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, R. W. (2004). Managerialism in US universities: Implications for the academic accounting profession. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15(4–5), 461–467.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. (2010). Rethinking accountability in a knowledge society. Journal of Educational Change, 11, 45–61.
   Google Scholar
• Saravanamuthu, K., & Filling, S. (2004). A critical response to managerialism in the academy. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15(4–5), 437–452.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, A. (1995). The chameleon of accountability: Forms and discourses. Accounting Organizations and Society, 20(2–3), 219–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speziale, M. T. (2009). Social reporting and school accountability. A critical analysis of the first experiences in Italy. EconomiaAziendale 2000web, 1, 179–201.
   Google Scholar
• Thorne, L., Mahoney, L. S., & Manetti, G. (2014). Motivations for issuing standalone CSR reports: A survey of Canadian firms. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(4), 686–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilling, M. V., & Tilt, C. A. (2004). Alas poor critical accounting, we knew him, Karl. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15(4–5), 557–563.
   Google Scholar
• Tilt, C. A. (2016). Corporate social responsibility research: The importance of context. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 1(2), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Tinker, T. (2005). The withering of criticism: A review of professional, foucauldian, ethnographic, and epistemic studies in accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(1), 100–135.
   Google Scholar
• Tooley, S., & Guthrie, J. (2007). Reporting performance by New Zealand secondary schools: An analysis of disclosures. Financial Accountability & Management, 23(4), 351–374.
   Google Scholar
• Trinidad, C., & Normore, A. H. (2005). Leadership and gender: A dangerous liaison? Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26(7), 574–590.
   Google Scholar
• William, D. (2010). Standardized testing and school accountability. Educational Psychologist, 45(2), 107–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, B., Wilmshurst, T., & Clift, R. (2011). Sustainability reporting by local government in Australia: Current and future prospects. Accounting Forum, 35(3), 176–186.
   Google Scholar