Exploring the oversight of risk management in UK higher education institutions: the case of audit committees

References

• Abraham, S., Marston, C., & Darby, P. (2012). Risk reporting: Clarity, relevance and location. Edinburgh: ICAS.
   Google Scholar
• Arena, M., Arnaboldi, M., & Azzone, G. (2010). The organizational dynamics of enterprise risk management. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(7), 659–675. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2010.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1, 177–194. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1.2.177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, B. C., & Peck, S. I. (2013). Boardroom strategic decision-making style: Understanding the antecedents. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(2), 131–146. doi: 10.1111/corg.12008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, L. (2006). Observation: A complex research method. Library Trends, 55(1), 171–189. doi: 10.1353/lib.2006.0045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beasley, M. R., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Neal, T. L. (2009). The audit committee oversight process. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(1), 65–122. doi: 10.1506/car.26.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabedo, J. D., & Tirado, J. M. (2004). The disclosure of risk in financial statements. Accounting Forum, 28, 181–200. doi: 10.1016/j.accfor.2003.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Christoper, J. (2012). The adoption of internal audit as a governance control mechanism in Australian public universities – views from the CEOs. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 34(5), 529–541. doi: 10.1080/1360080X.2012.716001
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Gaynor, L. M., Krishnamoorthy, G., & Wright, A. M. (2007). Auditor communications with the audit committee and the board of directors: Policy recommendations and opportunities for future research. Accounting Horizons, 21(2), 165–187. doi: 10.2308/acch.2007.21.2.165
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Krishamoorthy, G., & Wright, A. M. (2002). Corporate governance and the audit process. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(4), 573–594. doi: 10.1506/983M-EPXG-4Y0R-J9YK
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, P. M., & Woods, M. (2011). A comparison of local authority adoption of risk management in England and Australia. Australian Accounting Review, 21(2), 111–123. doi: 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2011.00126.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee of University Chairmen [CUC]. (2008). Handbook for members of audit committees in higher education institutions. London: CUC.
   Google Scholar
• Committee of University Chairmen [CUC]. (2009). Guide for members of higher education governing bodies in the UK. London: CUC.
   Google Scholar
• Day, R., & Woodward, T. (2004). Disclosure of information about employees in the Directors’ report of UK published financial statements: Substantive or symbolic? Accounting Forum, 28(1), 43–59. doi: 10.1016/j.accfor.2004.04.003
   Google Scholar
• de Pedro Ricoy, R. (2017). To interview or not to interview: A critical approach to assessing end-users’ perceptions of the role of 21st century indigenous interpreters in Peru. The International Journal of Translation and Interpretating Research, 9(1), 36–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewing, I. P., & Williams, B. C. (1995). The role of audit committees in UK universities. Managerial Auditing Journal, 10(6), 10–16. doi: 10.1108/02686909510088369
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. doi: 10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendron, Y., & Bedard, J. (2006). On the constitution of audit committee effectiveness. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(3), 211–239. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2005.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendron, Y., Bedard, J., & Gosselin, M. (2004). Getting inside the black box: A field study of practices in “effective” audit committees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 23(1), 153–171. doi: 10.2308/aud.2004.23.1.153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greatbatch, D. (2014). Governance in a changing environment: Literature review. London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Greco, G. (2012). The management’s reaction to new mandatory risk disclosure: A longitudinal study on Italian listed companies. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 17(2), 113–137. doi: 10.1108/13563281211220256
   Google Scholar
• Higher Education Funding Council for England [HEFCE]. (2001). Risk management: A briefing for governors and senior managers. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Higher Education Funding Council for England [HEFCE]. (2005). Risk management in higher education: A guide to good practice. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• LFHE. (2009). Getting to grips with risk: Resources for governors of UK universities and higher education colleges. London: LFHE.
   Google Scholar
• Linsley, P. M., Shrives, P. J., & Crumpton, M. (2006). Risk disclosure: An exploratory study of UK and Canadian banks. Journal of Banking Regulation, 7, 268–282. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jbr.2350032
   Google Scholar
• Marnet, O., & Soobaroyen, T. (2018). The quality of board decision-making processes in higher education institutions: UK and European experiences. London: LFHE.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis. A methods sourcebook. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mulhall, A. (2003). In the field: Notes on observation in qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41(3), 306–313. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02514.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntim, C. G. (2018). Governance and risk disclosure practices in UK higher education institutions in an era of austerity and reform. London: LFHE.
   Google Scholar
• Ntim, C. G., Lindop, S., Osei, K. A., & Thomas, D. A. (2013). Corporate governance and risk reporting in South Africa: A study of corporate risk disclosures in the pre- and post-2007/2008 global financial crisis period. International Review of Financial Analysis, 30, 363–383. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2013.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntim, C. G., Soobaroyen, T., & Broad, M. J. (2017). Governance structures, voluntary disclosures and public accountability: The case of UK higher education institutions. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(1), 65–118. doi: 10.1108/AAAJ-10-2014-1842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Dwyer, B. (2004). Qualitative data analysis: Exposing a process for transforming a “messy” but “attractive nuisance”. In C. Humphrey & B. Lee (Eds.), A real life guide to accounting research: A behind the scenes view of using qualitative research methods (pp. 391–407). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Palermo, T. (2014). Accountability and expertise in public sector risk management: A case study. Financial Accountability & Management, 30(3), 322–341. doi: 10.1111/faam.12039
   Google Scholar
• Parker, L. D. (2011). University corporatisation: Driving redefinition. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22, 434–450. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2010.11.002
   Google Scholar
• Parker, L. D. (2013). Contemporary university strategising: The financial imperative. Financial Accountability & Management, 29(1), 1–25. doi: 10.1111/faam.12000
   Google Scholar
• Parker, L. D., & Roffey, B. H. (1997). Methodological themes. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 10(2), 212–247. doi: 10.1108/09513579710166730
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (2004). The risk management of everything: Rethinking the politics of uncertainty. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M., Scheytt, T., Soin, K., & Sahlin, K. (2009). Reputational risk as a logic of organizing in late modernity. Organization Studies, 30(2–3), 301–324. doi: 10.1177/0170840608101482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schofield, A. (2013). Getting to grips with being a new governor. London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education (LFHE).
   Google Scholar
• Scott, P. (1995). The meanings of mass higher education. Buckingham: McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
   Google Scholar
• Shattock, M. (2013). University governance, leadership and management in a decade of diversification and uncertainty. Higher Education Quarterly, 67(3), 217–233. doi: 10.1111/hequ.12017
   Google Scholar
• Shattock, M. (2014). University governance in the UK: Bending the traditional model. International trends in university governance: Autonomy, self-governance and the distribution of authority (pp. 127–144).
   Google Scholar
• Soobaroyen, T., Broad, M. J., & Ntim, C. G. (2014). The role and effectiveness of audit committees in UK higher education institutions. London: LFHE.
   Google Scholar
• Soobaroyen, T., & Mahadeo, J. D. (2008). Selective compliance with the corporate governance code in Mauritius: Is legitimacy theory at work? In Corporate governance in less developed and emerging economies (pp. 239–272). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Spira, L. F., & Page, M. (2003). Risk management: The reinvention of internal control and the changing role of internal audit. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 16(4), 640–661. doi: 10.1108/09513570310492335
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610. doi: 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. (2013). What is good university financial management? Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 17(4), 141–147.
   Google Scholar
• Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. (1983). Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880–1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 22–39. doi: 10.2307/2392383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turley, S., & Zaman, M. (2007). Audit committee effectiveness: Informal processes and behavioural effects. Accounting, Auditing, & Accountability Journal, 20(5), 765–788. doi: 10.1108/09513570710779036
   Google Scholar