Corporate political strategy: the roles of management accounting in relational work

References

• Abernethy, M. A., & Chua, W. F. (1996). A field study of control system “redesign”: The impact of institutional processes on strategic choice. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13(2), 569–606. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1996.tb00515.x
   Google Scholar
• Ahrens, T., & Khalifa, R. (2015). The impact of regulation on management control: Compliance as a strategic response to institutional logics of university accreditation. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 12(2), 106–126. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-04-2015-0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andon, P., Baxter, J., & Chua, W. F. (2015). Accounting for stakeholders and making accounting useful. Journal of Management Studies, 52(7), 986–1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araujo, J. L. R. H. d. (2006). The case of Brazil: Reform by trial and error? In F. P. Sioshansi & W. Pfaffenberger (Eds.), Electricity market reform: An international perspective (pp. 565–594). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, D. P. (1995). Integrated strategy: Market and nonmarket components. California Management Review, 37(2), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertels, S., Hoffman, A. J., & DeJordy, R. (2014). The varied work of challenger movements: Identifying challenger roles in the US environmental movement. Organization Studies, 35(8), 1171–1210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613517601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonardi, J. P., Holburn, G. L. F., & Vanden Bergh, R. G. (2006). Nonmarket strategy performance: Evidence from U.S. Electric utilities. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1209–1228. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.23478676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman, A. (2015). An illusion of success: The consequences of British rail privatisation. Accounting Forum, 39(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2014.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canning, M., & O'Dwyer, B. (2016). Institutional work and regulatory change in the accounting profession. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 54, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2016.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, C., & Whittle, A. (2018). Making strategy critical? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 53, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2018.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA) & American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2014). Global management accounting principles. CIMA & AICPA.
   Google Scholar
• Chiwamit, P., Modell, S., & Scapens, R. W. (2017). Regulation and adaptation of management accounting innovations: The case of economic value added in Thai state-owned enterprises. Management Accounting Research, 37, 30–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2017.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiwamit, P., Modell, S., & Yang, C. L. (2014). The societal relevance of management accounting innovations: Economic value Added and institutional work in the fields of Chinese and Thai state-owned enterprises. Accounting and Business Research, 44(2), 144–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2013.868300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, L. (2005). A structuration analysis of accounting systems and systems of accountability in the privatised gas industry. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1045-2354(02)00212-5
   Google Scholar
• Dambrin, C., Lambert, C., & Sponem, S. (2007). Control and change-analysing the process of institutionalisation. Management Accounting Research, 18(2), 172–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2007.02.003
   Google Scholar
• DeMello, R. (2020, August 27). Corporate political strategies. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. https://oxfordre.com/business/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.001.0001/acrefore-9780190224851-e-24
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. F., Rigsby, J. T., & Goodman, C. (2004). The making and remaking of organization context: Duality and the institutionalization process. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 17(4), 506–542. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570410554542
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, S. E. A., Meyer, K. E., & Day, M. (2007). Exploitation and exploration learning and the development of organizational capabilities: A cross-case analysis of the Russian oil industry. Human Relations, 60(10), 1493–1523. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726707083475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, S. E. A., Meyer, K. E., & Day, M. (2010). Stages of organizational transformation in transition economies: A dynamic capabilities approach. Journal of Management Studies, 47(3), 416–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00856.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doh, J. P., Lawton, T. C., & Rajwani, T. (2012). Advancing nonmarket strategy research: Institutional perspectives in a changing world. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(3), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorado, S. (2013). Small groups as context for institutional entrepreneurship: An exploration of the emergence of commercial microfinance in Bolivia. Organization Studies, 34(4), 533–557. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612470255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorobantu, S., Kaul, A., & Zelner, B. (2017). Nonmarket strategy research through the lens of new institutional economics: An integrative review and future directions. Strategic Management Journal, 38(1), 114–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englund, H., & Gerdin, J. (2018). Management accounting and the paradox of embedded agency: A framework for analyzing sources of structural change. Management Accounting Research, 38, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2017.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evgenii, A., Anatoli, B., & Giuseppe, G. (2018). Participatory budgeting as a form of dialogic accounting in Russia: Actors’ institutional work and reflexivity trap. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(4), 1098–1123. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-02-2016-2435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiondella, C., Macchioni, R., Maffei, M., & Spanò, R. (2016). Successful changes in management accounting systems: A healthcare case study. Accounting Forum, 40(3), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2016.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funk, R. J., & Hirschman, D. (2017). Beyond nonmarket strategy: Market actions as corporate political activity. Academy of Management Review, 42(1), 32–52. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, E., Chattopadhyay, P., Sitkin, S. B., & Barden, J. (2006). Cognitive underpinnings of institutional persistence and change: A framing perspective. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 347–365. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.20208685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girschik, V. (2020). Managing legitimacy in business-driven social change: The role of relational work. Journal of Management Studies, 57(4), 775–804. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greiner, M., & Lee, J. (2020). A supply-side approach to corporate political activity: Performance consequences of ideologically driven CPA. Journal of Business Research, 115, 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadani, M., Doh, J. P., & Schneider, M. A. (2018). Corporate political activity and regulatory capture: How some companies blunt the knife of socially oriented investor activism. Journal of Management, 44(5), 2064–2093. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316638162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampel, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Tracey, P. (2017). Institutional work: Taking stock and making it matter. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, & R. Meyer (Eds.), SAGE Handbook of organizational institutionalism (2nd ed., pp. 558–590). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hayne, C., & Free, C. (2014). Hybridized professional groups and institutional work: COSO and the rise of enterprise risk management. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(5), 309–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heese, J., Krishnan, R., & Moers, F. (2016). Selective regulator decoupling and organizations’ strategic responses. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6), 2178–2204. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfat, C. E., & Martin, J. A. (2015). Dynamic managerial capabilities: Review and assessment of managerial impact on strategic change. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1281–1312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314561301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfen, M., & Sydow, J. (2013). Negotiating as institutional work: The case of labour standards and international framework agreements. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1073–1098. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613492072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiatt, S. R., & Park, S. (2013). Lords of the harvest: Third-party influence and regulatory approval of genetically modified organisms. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 923–944. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiebl, M. R. W. (2018). Management accounting as a political resource for enabling embedded agency. Management Accounting Research, 38, 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2017.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. J., Keim, G. D., & Schuler, D. (2004). Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 30(6), 837–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooks, J. J., & Perera, H. (2006). The evolution of annual reporting practices of an electricity firm. Accounting Forum, 30(2), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2005.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, T., & Bui, B. (2016). Has management accounting research been critical? Management Accounting Research, 31, 10–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2015.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopper, T., & Major, M. (2007). Extending institutional analysis through theoretical triangulation: Regulation and activity based costing in Portuguese telecommunications. European Accounting Review, 16(1), 59–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180701265879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotho, J., & Saka-Helmhout, A. (2017). In and between societies: Reconnecting comparative institutionalism and organization theory. Organization Studies, 38(5), 647–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616655832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jupe, R., & Funnell, W. (2015). Neoliberalism, consultants and the privatisation of public policy formulation: The case of Britain’s rail industry. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 29, 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2015.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keim, G. D., & Hillman, A. J. (2008). Political environments and business strategy: Implications for managers. Business Horizons, 51(1), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2007.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kury, K. W. (2007). Decoupled earnings: An institutional perspective of the consequences of maximizing shareholder value. Accounting Forum, 31(4), 370–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2007.09.003
   Google Scholar
• Lapsley, I., & Wright, E. (2004). The diffusion of management accounting innovations in the public sector: A research agenda. Management Accounting Research, 15(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2003.12.007
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T., & Suddaby, R. O. Y. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organization studies (Vol. 2, pp. 215–254). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Losekann, L. (2008). The second reform of the Brazilian electric sector. International Journal of Global Energy Issues, 29(1/2), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGEI.2008.016342
   Google Scholar
• Lukka, K., & Modell, S. (2010). Validation in interpretive management accounting research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(4), 462–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquis, C., & Raynard, M. (2015). Institutional strategies in emerging markets. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 291–335. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2015.1014661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquis, C., Zhang, J., & Zhou, Y. (2011). Regulatory uncertainty and corporate responses to environmental protection in China. California Management Review, 54(1), 39–63. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2011.54.1.39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellahi, K., Frynas, J. G., Sun, P., & Siegel, D. (2016). A review of the nonmarket strategy literature: Toward a multi-theoretical integration. Journal of Management, 42(1), 143–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315617241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Modell, S. (2001). Performance measurement and institutional processes: A study of managerial responses to public sector reform. Management Accounting Research, 12(4), 437–464. https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.2001.0164
   Google Scholar
• Modell, S. (2014). The societal relevance of management accounting: An introduction to the special issue. Accounting and Business Research, 44(2), 83–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2014.882741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modell, S. (2019). Constructing institutional performance: A multi-level framing perspective on performance measurement and management. Accounting and Business Research, 49(4), 428–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2018.1507811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modell, S., Jacobs, K., & Wiesel, F. (2007). A process (re)turn?: Path dependencies, institutions and performance management in Swedish central government. Management Accounting Research, 18(4), 453–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2006.12.001
   Google Scholar
• Modell, S., Vinnari, E., & Lukka, K. (2017). On the virtues and vices of combining theories: The case of institutional and actor-network theories in accounting research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 60, 62–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2017.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modell, S., & Yang, C. (2018). Financialisation as a strategic action field: An historically informed field study of governance reforms in Chinese state-owned enterprises. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 54, 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2017.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, C., Roslender, R., & Schaper, S. (2016). Continuities in the use of the intellectual capital statement approach: Elements of an institutional theory analysis. Accounting Forum, 40(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2015.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. The Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4279002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, C., & Holzinger, I. (2008). The effectiveness of strategic political management: A dynamic capabilities framework. The Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 496–520. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.31193538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pache, A. C., & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 455–476. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.35.3.zok455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pache, A. C., & Santos, F. (2013a). Embedded in hybrid contexts: How individuals in organizations respond to competing institutional logics. In E. B. Michael Lounsbury (Ed.), Institutional Logics in action, part B. Research in the sociology of organizations (pp. 3–35). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X(2013)0039AB014
   Google Scholar
• Pache, A. C., & Santos, F. (2013b). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972–1001. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, L. D. (2012). Qualitative management accounting research: Assessing deliverables and relevance. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 23(1), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2011.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y. L., & Jiang, Y. (2008). An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5), 920–936. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, N., & Lawrence, T. B. (2012). The turn to work in organization and management theory: Some implications for strategic organization. Strategic Organization, 10(3), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127012453109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riaz, S., Buchanan, S., & Bapuji, H. (2011). Institutional work amidst the financial crisis: Emerging positions of elite actors. Organization, 18(2), 187–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508410389630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha, K., & Alcaraz Garcia, F. A. (2006). Credit risk in the pool implications for private capital investments in Brazilian power generation. Energy Policy, 34(18), 3827–3835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scapens, R. W. (1990). Researching management accounting practice: The role of case study methods. The British Accounting Review, 22(3), 259–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-8389(90)90008-6
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shaoul, J. (1997). The power of accounting: Reflecting on water privatization? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 10(3), 382–405. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579710178124
   Google Scholar
• Signorini, G., Ross, R. B., & Peterson, H. C. (2015). Historical analysis of institutions and organizations: The case of the Brazilian electricity sector. Journal of Institutional Economics, 11(1), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137414000344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (2004). Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (2014). Interpreting qualitative data (5th ed). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Siti-Nabiha, A. K., & Scapens, R. W. (2005). Stability and change: An institutionalist study of management accounting change. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(1), 44–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570510584656
   Google Scholar
• Slager, R., Gond, J. P., & Moon, J. (2012). Standardization as institutional work: The regulatory power of a responsible investment standard. Organization Studies, 33(5-6), 763–790. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612443628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolowy, H. (2017). Letter from the editor: Why are papers desk rejected at European accounting review? European Accounting Review, 26(3), 411–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2017.1347360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suddaby, R., & Viale, T. (2011). Professionals and field-level change: Institutional work and the professional project. Current Sociology, 59(4), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392111402586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. (2012). Dynamic capabilities: Routines versus entrepreneurial action. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1395–1401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01080.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanderley, C. d. A., Cullen, J., & Tsamenyi, M. (2011). Electricity sector reforms and the tariff review process in Brazil. In M. Ugur, & D. Sunderland (Eds.), Does economic governance matter? Governance institutions and outcomes (pp. 212–233). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, L., & Seal, W. (2018). Using investment appraisal models in strategic negotiation: The cultural political economy of electricity generation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 70, 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrona, T., & Sinzig, C. (2018). Nonmarket strategy research: Systematic literature review and future directions. Journal of Business Economics, 88(2), 253–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-017-0875-3
   Google Scholar
• Xu, D., & Meyer, K. E. (2013). Linking theory and context: ‘Strategy research in emerging economies’ after Wright et al. (2005). Journal of Management Studies, 50(7), 1322–1346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01051.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdifar, H., Zaman, M., Tsamenyi, M., & Askarany, D. (2008). Management accounting change in a subsidiary organisation. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 19(3), 404–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2006.08.004
   Google Scholar