1,763
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

How do doctoral students experience supervision?

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 293-307 | Received 21 Oct 2017, Accepted 06 Aug 2018, Published online: 15 Sep 2018

References

  • Acker, S., T. Hill, and E. Black. 1994. “Thesis Supervision in the Social Sciences: Managed or Negotiated?” Higher Education 28 (4): 483–498. doi: 10.1007/BF01383939
  • Åkerlind, G., and L. McAlpine. 2017. “Supervising Doctoral Students: Variation in Purpose and Pedagogy.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (9): 1686–1698. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1118031
  • Appel, M. L., and L. G. Dahlgren. 2003. “Swedish Doctoral Students’ Experiences on Their Journey Towards a PhD: Obstacles and Opportunities Inside and Outside the Academic Building.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 47 (1): 89–110. doi: 10.1080/00313830308608
  • Barnes, B. J., and A. E. Austin. 2009. “The Role of Doctoral Advisors: A Look at Advising from the Advisor’s Perspective.” Innovative Higher Education 33: 297–315. doi: 10.1007/s10755-008-9084-x
  • Castelló, M., A. Iñesta, and M. Corcelles. 2013. “Learning to Write a Research Article: Ph.D. Students’ Transitions Toward Disciplinary Writing Regulation.” Research in the Teaching of English 47 (4): 442–477.
  • Castelló, M., A. Iñesta, and C. Monereo. 2009. “Towards Self-regulated Academic Writing: An Exploratory Study with Graduate Students in a Situated Learning Environment.” Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology 9 (3): 1107–1130.
  • Castelló, M., L. McAlpine, and K. Pyhältö. 2017. “Spanish and UK Post-PhD Researchers: Writing Perceptions, Well-being and Productivity.” Higher Education Research & Development 36 (6): 1108–1122. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2017.1296412
  • Castelló, M., M. Pardo, A. Sala-Bubaré, and N. Suñe-Soler. 2017. “Why Do Students Consider Dropping Out of Doctoral Degrees? Institutional and Personal Factors.” Higher Education 74 (6): 1053–1068. doi: 10.1007/s10734-016-0106-9
  • Creswell, J. W. 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Los Angeles: Sage publications.
  • Egan, R., D. Stockley, B. Brouwer, D. Tripp, and N. Stechyson. 2009. “Relationships between Area of Academic Concentration, Supervisory Style, Student Needs and Best Practices.” Studies in Higher Education 34: 337–345. doi: 10.1080/03075070802597143
  • Gardner, S. K. 2008. “What’s Too Much and What’s Too Little?’: The Process of Becoming an Independent Researcher in Doctoral Education.” The Journal of Higher Education 79: 326–350. doi: 10.1080/00221546.2008.11772101
  • Gardner, S. K. 2010. “Faculty Perspectives on Doctoral Student Socialization in Five Disciplines.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 5: 39–53. doi: 10.28945/1310
  • Gardner, S. K., and B. Gopaul. 2012. “The Part-time Doctoral Student Experience.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 7: 63–78. doi: 10.28945/1561
  • Golde, C. M. 2010. “Entering Different Worlds. Socialization into Disciplinary Communities.” In On Becoming a Scholar: Socialization and Development in Doctoral Education, edited by S. K. Gardner, and P. Mendoza, 79–95. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
  • Hakkarainen, K. P., S. Wires, J. Keskinen, S. Paavola, P. Pohjola, K. Lonka, and K. Pyhältö. 2014. “On Personal and Collective Dimensions of Agency in Doctoral Training: Medicine and Natural Science Programs.” Studies in Continuing Education 36: 83–100. doi: 10.1080/0158037X.2013.787982
  • Hopwood, N. 2010. “A Sociocultural View of Doctoral Students’ Relationships and Agency.” Studies in Continuing Education 32: 103–117. doi: 10.1080/0158037X.2010.487482
  • Ives, G., and G. Rowley. 2005. “Supervisor Selection or Allocation and Continuity of Supervision: Ph.D. Students’ Progress and Outcomes.” Studies in Higher Education 30: 535–555. doi: 10.1080/03075070500249161
  • Jairam, D., and D. H. Kahl Jr. 2012. “Navigating the Doctoral Experience: The Role of Social Support in Successful Degree Completion.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 7: 311–329. doi: 10.28945/1700
  • Jazvac-Martek, M. 2009. “Oscillating Role Identities: The Academic Experiences of Education Doctoral Students.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 46 (3): 253–264. doi: 10.1080/14703290903068862
  • Kobayashi, S., B. Grout, and CØ Rump. 2013. “Interaction and Learning in PhD Supervision–a Qualitative Study of Supervision with Multiple Supervisors.” Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift 8: 13–25.
  • Löfström, E., and K. Pyhältö. 2014. “Ethical Issues in Doctoral Supervision: The Perspectives of PhD Students in the Natural and Behavioral Sciences.” Ethics & Behavior 24: 195–214. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2013.830574
  • Mainhard, T., R. van der Rijst, J. van Tartwijk, and T. Wubbels. 2009. “A Model for the Supervisor–Doctoral Student Relationship.” Higher Education 58: 359–373. doi: 10.1007/s10734-009-9199-8
  • Malfroy, J. 2005. “Doctoral Supervision, Workplace Research and Changing Pedagogic Practices.” Higher Education Research & Development 24: 165–178. doi: 10.1080/07294360500062961
  • Martinsuo, M., and V. Turkulainen. 2011. “Personal Commitment, Support and Progress in Doctoral Studies.” Studies in Higher Education 36: 103–120. doi: 10.1080/03075070903469598
  • McAlpine, L., and C. Amundsen. 2009. “Identity and Agency: Pleasures and Collegiality among the Challenges of the Doctoral Journey.” Studies in Continuing Education 31: 109–125. doi: 10.1080/01580370902927378
  • McAlpine, L., M. Jazvac-Martek, and N. Hopwood. 2009. “Doctoral Student Experience in Education: Activities and Difficulties Influencing Identity Development.” International Journal for Researcher Development 1 (1): 97–109. doi: 10.1108/1759751X201100007
  • McAlpine, L., and M. McKinnon. 2013. “Supervision – the Most Variable of Variables: Student Perspectives.” Studies in Continuing Education 35: 265–280. doi: 10.1080/0158037X.2012.746227
  • Moxham, L., T. Dwyer, and K. Reid-Searl. 2013. “Articulating Expectations for PhD Candidature Upon Commencement: Ensuring Supervisor/Student ‘Best Fit’.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 35: 345–354. doi: 10.1080/1360080X.2013.812030
  • Overall, N. C., K. L. Deane, and E. R. Peterson. 2011. “Promoting Doctoral Students’ Research Self-Efficacy: Combining Academic Guidance with Autonomy Support.” Higher Education, Research & Development 30: 791–805. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2010.535508
  • Pyhältö, K., and J. Keskinen. 2012. “Doctoral Students’ Sense of Relational Agency in Their Scholarly Communities.” International Journal of Higher Education 1: 136–149. doi: 10.5430/ijhe.v1n2p136
  • Pyhältö, K., J. Stubb, and K. Lonka. 2009. “Developing Scholarly Communities as Learning Environments for Doctoral Students.” International Journal for Academic Development 14: 221–232. doi: 10.1080/13601440903106551
  • Pyhältö, K., A. Toom, J. Stubb, and K. Lonka. 2012. “Challenges of Becoming a Scholar: A Study of Doctoral Students’ Problems and Well-Being.” ISRN Education. Accessed January 2017. doi:10.5402/2012/934941.
  • Pyhältö, K., J. Vekkaila, and J. Keskinen. 2015. “Fit Matters in the Supervisory Relationship: Doctoral Students and Supervisors Perceptions About the Supervisory Activities.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 52 (1): 4–16. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2014.981836
  • Sala-Bubaré, A., and M. Castelló. 2017. “Exploring the Relationship between Doctoral Students’ Experiences and Research Community Positioning.” Studies in Continuing Education 39 (1): 16–34. doi: 10.1080/0158037X.2016.1216832
  • Skakni, I., and L. McAlpine. 2017. “Post-phd Researchers’ Experiences: An Emotionally Rocky Road.” Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education 8 (2): 205–219. doi: 10.1108/SGPE-D-17-00026
  • Stubb, J., K. Pyhältö, and K. Lonka. 2014. “Conceptions of research: the doctoral student experience in three domains.” Studies in Higher Education 39 (2): 251–264. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2011.651449
  • Turner, G. 2015. “Learning to Supervise: Four Journeys.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 52 (1): 86–98. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2014.981840
  • Wisker, G. 2016. “Agency and Articulation in Doctoral Writing: Building the Messy Research Journey Into a Well-Constructed Thesis.” In Research Literacies and Writing Pedagogies for Masters and Doctoral Writers, edited by C. Badenhorst, and C. Guerin, 184–201. Leiden: Brill.
  • Zhao, C. M., C. M. Golde, and A. C. McCormick. 2007. “More Than a Signature: How Advisor Choice and Advisor Behavior Affect Doctoral Student Satisfaction.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 31: 263–281. doi: 10.1080/03098770701424983

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.