559
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Grasping the nettle of ‘doctorateness’ for practitioner academics: a framework for thinking critically about curriculum design

ORCID Icon
Pages 157-172 | Received 10 Oct 2017, Accepted 17 Sep 2018, Published online: 26 Sep 2018

References

  • Armsby, P. 2012. “Accreditation of Experiential Learning at Doctoral Level.” Journal of Workplace Learning 24 (2): 133–150. doi: 10.1108/13665621211201715
  • Armsby, P., C. Costley, and J. Garnett. 2006. “The Legitimisation of Knowledge: A Work-based Learning Perspective of APEL.” International Journal of Lifelong Education 25 (4): 369–383. doi: 10.1080/02601370600772368
  • Baillie, C., J. A. Bowden, and J. H. F. Meyer. 2013. “Threshold Capabilities: Threshold Concepts and Knowledge Capability Linked Through Variation Theory.” Higher Education 65: 227–246. doi: 10.1007/s10734-012-9540-5
  • Barradell, S. 2013. “The Identification of Threshold Concepts: A Review of Theoretical Complexities and Methodological Challenges.” Higher Education 65: 265–276. doi: 10.1007/s10734-012-9542-3
  • Baumfield, V., E. Hall, R. Lofthouse, and K. Wall. 2016. “What Do We Mean When We Talk About Practice? Working In Partnership To Understand Teachers’ Labour, Work And Action In The Classroom.” Paper presented at the European conference on educational research, University College Dublin, August 23–26.
  • Bernstein, B. 1996. Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity, Theory, Research, Critique. London: Taylor and Francis.
  • Biesta, G., and M. Priestley. 2014. “Capacities and the Curriculum.” In Reinventing the Curriculum, edited by M. Priestley and G. Biesta, 35–49. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Billett, S. 2006. “Constituting the Workplace Curriculum.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 38 (1): 31–48. doi: 10.1080/00220270500153781
  • Cooper, L., and J. Harris. 2013. “Recognition of Prior Learning: Exploring the ‘Knowledge Question’.” International Journal of Lifelong Education 32 (4): 447–463. doi: 10.1080/02601370.2013.778072
  • Dewey, J. 1986. “Experience and Education.” The Educational Forum 50 (3): 241–252. doi: 10.1080/00131728609335764
  • Dmitrov, N. 2012. Mastering “Doctorateness”: Helping Graduate Students Understand How to Move from ABD to PhD. Ontario: Reflections Newsletter Western University. http://www.uwo.ca/tsc/resources/publications/newsletter/selected_articles/mastering_doctorateness.html.
  • Ecclestone, K. 2000. “Bewitched, Bothered and Bewildered: A Policy Analysis of the GNVQ Assessment Regime 1992–2000.” Journal of Education Policy 15 (5): 539–558. doi: 10.1080/026809300750001685
  • Eraut, M. 1994. Developing Professional Knowledge and Competence. London: Falmer.
  • Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, and M. Trow. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: SAGE.
  • Goncalves, M. M., and A. P. Ribiero. 2012. “Therapeutic Change, Innovative Moments, and the Reconceptualization of the Self: A Dialogical Account.” International Journal for Dialogical Science 6 (1): 81–98.
  • Hattie, J. 2012. Visible Learning for Teachers: Maximising Impact on Learning. London: Routledge.
  • Hessels, L. K., and H. van Lente. 2008. “Re-thinking new Knowledge Production: A Literature Review and a Research Agenda.” Research Policy 37: 740–760. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.008
  • James, M., and S. Brown. 2005. “Grasping the TLRP Nettle: Preliminary Analysis and Some Enduring Issues Surrounding the Improvement of Learning Outcomes.” Curriculum Journal 16 (1): 7–30. doi: 10.1080/0958517042000336782
  • Keefer, J. M. 2015. “Experiencing Doctoral Liminality as a Conceptual Threshold and How Supervisors Can Use it.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 52 (1): 17–28. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2014.981839
  • Kiley, M. 2015. “‘I Didn’t Have a Clue What They Were Talking About’: PhD Candidates and Theory.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 52 (1): 52–63. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2014.981835
  • Kiley, M., and G. Wisker. 2009. “Threshold Concepts in Research Education and Evidence of Threshold Crossing.” Higher Education Research & Development 28 (4): 431–441. doi: 10.1080/07294360903067930
  • Knorr Cetina, K. 2001. “Objectual Practice.” In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, edited by T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, and E. von Savigny, 175–188. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Land, R. 2016. “Toil and Trouble.” In Threshold Concepts in Practice, edited by R. Land, J. H. F. Meyer, and M. T. Flanagan, 11–24. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • Makinen, M., and J. Annala. 2010. “Meanings Behind Curriculum Development in Higher Education.” Prime 4 (2): 9–24.
  • Meyer, J. H. F., and R. Land. 2005. “Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge (2): Epistemological Considerations and a Conceptual Framework for Teaching and Learning.” Higher Education 49: 373–388. doi: 10.1007/s10734-004-6779-5
  • Mezirow, J. 2003. “Transformative Learning as Discourse.” Journal of Transformative Education 1 (1): 58–63. doi: 10.1177/1541344603252172
  • Neumann, R. 2005. “Doctoral Differences: Professional Doctorates and PhDs Compared.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 27 (2): 173–188. doi: 10.1080/13600800500120027
  • Pearce, L. 2005. How to Examine a Thesis. Maidenhead: OUP.
  • Peirce, C. S. 1877. The Fixation of Belief Popular Science Monthly 12 (November 1877), 1–15.
  • Priestley, M., and G. Biesta, eds. 2014. Reinventing the Curriculum. London: Bloomsbury.
  • QAA. 2015. Characteristics Statement – Doctoral Degree UK Quality Code for Higher Education Part A: Setting and Maintaining Academic Standards http://www.qaa.ac.uk/en/Publications/Documents/Doctoral-Degree-Characteristics-15.pdf.
  • Quinlan, K. M., S. Male, C. Baillie, A. Stamboulis, J. Fill, and Z. Jaffer. 2013. “Methodological Challenges in Researching Threshold Concepts: A Comparative Analysis of Three Projects.” Higher Education 66: 585–601. doi: 10.1007/s10734-013-9623-y
  • Reskin, B. F. 2003. “Including Mechanisms in Our Models of Ascriptive Inequality.” American Sociological Review 68 (1): 1–21. doi: 10.2307/3088900
  • Schildkraut, J., and M. C. Stafford. 2015. “Researching Professionals or Professional Researchers? A Comparison of Professional Doctorate and PhD Programs in Criminology & Criminal Justice.” American Journal of Criminal Justice 40: 183–198. doi: 10.1007/s12103-014-9240-z
  • Sfard, A. 2016. “Ritual for Ritual, Exploration for Exploration or What the Learners Get is What You Get from Them in Return.” In Research for Educational Change: Transforming Researchers’ Insights Into Improvement in Mathematics Teaching and Learning, edited by J. Adler and A. Sfard, 41–63. London: Routledge.
  • Shinners-Kennedy, D., and S. A. Fincher. 2013. “Identifying Threshold Concepts: From Dead End to a New Direction.” Paper presented at ICER ‘13 proceedings of the ninth annual international ACM conference on international computing education research, New York, NY, USA. Accessed September 12, 2016. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2493396.
  • Trafford, V., and S. Leshem. 2009. “Doctorateness as a Threshold Concept.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 46 (3): 305–316. doi: 10.1080/14703290903069027
  • van der Vleuten, C., and L. Schuwirth. 2005. “Assessing Professional Competence: From Methods to Programmes.” Medical Education 39 (3): 309–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02094.x
  • Vygotsky, L. 1978. Mind in Society: the Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Wellington, J. 2013. “Searching for ‘Doctorateness’.” Studies in Higher Education 38 (10): 1490–1503. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2011.634901
  • Wenger-Trayner, E., M. Fenton-O'Creevy, S. Hutchinson, C. Kubiak, and B. Wenger-Trayner. 2014. Learning in Landscapes of Practice: Boundaries, Identity, and Knowledgeability in Practice Based Learning. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Weresh, M. H. 2014. “Stargate: Malleability as a Threshold Concept in Legal Education.” Journal of Legal Education 63: 689–728.
  • Wittek, L., and T. Kvernbekk. 2011. “On the Problems of Asking for a Definition of Quality in Education.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 55 (6): 671–684. doi: 10.1080/00313831.2011.594618
  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953) 2001. Philosophical Investigations, 107. London: Blackwell.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.