New perspectives in online doctoral supervision: a systematic literature review

References

• Abiddin, N. Z. 2007. “The Role of an Effective Supervisor: Case Studies at the University of Manchester, United Kingdom.” European Journal of Scientific Research 16 (3): 380–394. http://ssrn.com/abstract=962228
   Google Scholar
• Abigail, W., and P. Hill. 2017. “Quality in Higher Education Choosing a Research Higher Degree Supervisor: A Framework for Nurses for Nurses.” Quality in Higher Education 8322: 1–20. doi:10.1080/13538322.2015.1049437.
   Google Scholar
• Ali, A., and F. Kohun. 2007. “Dealing with Social Isolation to Minimize Doctoral Attrition – A Four Stage Framework.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 2: 033–049.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew, M. 2012. “Supervising Doctorates at a Distance: Three Trans-Tasman Stories.” Quality Assurance in Education 20 (1): 42–53. doi:10.1108/09684881211198239.
   Google Scholar
• Arvidsson, B., and A. Franke. 2013. “Nurses’ Various Ways of Conceiving Their Learning Process as Doctoral Students: A Phenomenographic Study.” Nurse Education in Practice 13 (1): 53–57. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2012.07.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askew, C., R. Dixon, R. Mccormick, K. Callaghan, and G. Y. Wang. 2016. “Facilitators and Barriers to Doctoral Supervision : A Case Study in Health Sciences.” Issues in Educational Research 26 (1): 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aytemur, J. O. E. F. 2008. “Mentoring—A Relationship Based on Trust: Qualitative Research.” Public Personnel Management 37 (1): 55–65. doi:10.1177/009102600803700104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backhouse, J., B. A. Ungadi, and M. Cross. 2015. “They Can’t Even Agree !’: Students’ Conversations About Their Supervisors in Constructing Understandings of the Doctorate.” South African Journal of Higher Education 29 (4): 14–34.
   Google Scholar
• Bastalich, W. 2015. “Content and Context in Knowledge Production: A Critical Review of Doctoral Supervision Literature.” Studies in Higher Education 5079: 1–13. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1079702.
   Google Scholar
• Bastalich, W. 2017. “Content and Context in Knowledge Production: A Critical Review of Doctoral Supervision Literature.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (7): 1145–1157. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1079702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bégin, C., and L. Gérard. 2013. “The Role of Supervisors in Light of the Experience of Doctoral Students.” Policy Futures in Education 11 (3): 267–276. doi:10.2304/pfie.2013.11.3.267.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsen, S., and G. S. Jensen. 2015. “Online Supervision at the University.” Laering & Medier 13: 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Benmore, A. 2016. “Boundary Management in Doctoral Supervision: How Supervisors Negotiate Roles and Role Transitions Throughout the Supervisory Journey.” Studies in Higher Education 41 (7): 1251–1264. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.967203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehe, D. M. 2016. “Studies in Higher Education Supervisory Styles: a Contingency Framework Supervisory Styles: A Contingency Framework.” Studies in Higher Education 41 (3): 399–414. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.927853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbury-Jones, C., F. Irvine, and S. Sambrook. 2007. “Unity and Detachment: A Discourse Analysis of Doctoral Supervision.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 6 (4): 81–96. http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/IJQM/article/view/983.
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury-Jones, C., F. Irvine, and S. Sambrook. 2010. “Empowerment of Nursing Students in Clinical Practice: Spheres of Influence.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 66 (9): 2061–2070. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05351.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnard, P., T. Dragovic, J. Flutter, and J. Alderton. 2016. Transformative Doctoral Research Practices for Professionals. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cherry, N. 2012. “The Paradox and fog of Supervision: Site for the Encounters and Growth of Praxis, Persons and Voices.” Quality Assurance in Education 20 (1): 6–19. doi:10.1108/09684881211198202.
   Google Scholar
• Cherry, M. G., I. Fletcher, and H. O’Sullivan. 2013. “Exploring the Relationships among Attachment, Emotional Intelligence and Communication.” Medical Education 47 (3): 317–325. doi:10.1111/medu.12115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotterall, S. 2011. “Doctoral Students Writing: Where’s the Pedagogy?” Teaching in Higher Education 16 (4): 413–425. doi:10.1080/13562517.2011.560381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CRD. 2009. “CRDs’ Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Health Care.” Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York. http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/pdf/Systematic_Reviews.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Deuchar, R. 2008. “Facilitator, Director or Critical Friend?: Contradiction and Congruence in Doctoral Supervision Styles.” Teaching in Higher Education 13 (4): 489–500. doi:10.1080/13562510802193905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, K., and K. H. Hunter. 2016. “PhD Student Emotional Exhaustion: the Role of Supportive Supervision and Self-Presentation Behaviours.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 3297: 1–10. doi:10.1080/14703297.2016.1174143.
   Google Scholar
• Devos, C., N. Van der Linden, G. Boudrenghien, A. Azzi, M. Frenay, B. Galand, and O. Klein. 2015. “Doctoral Supervision in the Light of the Three Types of Support Promoted in Self-Determination Theory Doctoral Supervision in the Light of the Three Types of Support Promoted in Self-Determination Theory.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 10: 439–464.
   Google Scholar
• Doloriert, C., and S. Sambrook. 2012. “Power and Emotion in Doctoral Supervision: Implications for HRD.” European Journal of Training and Development 36 (7): 732–750. doi:10.1108/03090591211255566.
   Google Scholar
• Dorum, K., C. Bartle, and M. Pennington. 1997. “The Effect of Online Social Networking on Facilitating Sense of Belonging Among University Students Living Off Campus,” 1–7. https://www2.le.ac.uk/offices/ssds/projects/student-retention-project/dissemination/papers-and-publications/The%20Effect%20of%20Online%20Social%20Networking%20on%20Facilitating%20Sense%20of%20Belonging%20among%20University%20Students%20Living%20Off%20Cam.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, R., and M. Wilson. 2017. “Digital Doctorates ? An Exploratory Study of PhD Candidates’ Use of Online Tools.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 3297: 1–11. doi:10.1080/14703297.2015.1058720.
   Google Scholar
• Ellemers, N., E. Sleebos, D. Stam, and D. Gilder. 2013. “Feeling Included and Valued: How Perceived Respect Affects Positive Team Identity and Willingness to Invest in the Team.” British Journal of Management 24 (1): 21–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erichsen, E. A., D. U. Bolliger, and C. Halupa. 2014. “Student Satisfaction with Graduate Supervision in Doctoral Programs Primarily Delivered in Distance Education Settings.” Studies in Higher Education 39 (2): 321–338. doi:10.1080/03075079.2012.709496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erwee, R., P. R. Albion, H. van Rensburg, and R. Malan. 2011. “Dealing with Doctoral Students: Tips From the Trenches.” South African Journal of Higher Education 25 (5): 39–51.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, C., and K. Stevenson. 2010. “The Learning Experiences of International Doctoral Students with Particular Reference to Nursing Students: A Literature Review.” International Journal of Nursing Studies 47 (2): 239–250. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.05.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feather, D., and K. E. McDermott. 2014. “The Role of New Doctoral Supervisors in Higher Education – a Reflective View of Literature and Experience Using Two Case Studies.” Research in Post-Compulsory Education 19 (2): 165–176. doi:10.1080/13596748.2014.897506.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, S. K., and B. Gopaul. 2012. “The Part-Time Doctoral Student Experience.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 7: 063–078.
   Google Scholar
• Göran, L., and W. Tengberg. 2015. “The Agile Approach with Doctoral Dissertation Supervision.” International Congress Series 8 (11): 139–147. doi:10.5539/ies.v8n11p139.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, D., S. Oliver, and J. Thomas. 2012. An Introduction to Systematic Reviews. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, B. 1999. “Walking on a Rackety Bridge: Mapping Supervision.” In Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia. Accessed April 6, 2008. http://www.herdsa.org.au/branches/vic/Cornerstones/pdf/grant.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, B. 2003. “Mapping the Pleasures and Risks of Supervision.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 24 (2): 175–190. doi:10.1080/01596300303042.
   Google Scholar
• Green, P., and J. Bowden. 2012. “Completion Mindsets and Contexts in Doctoral Supervision.” Quality Assurance in Education 20 (1): 66–80. doi:10.1108/09684881211198257.
   Google Scholar
• Gunnarsson, R., G. Jonasson, and A. Billhult. 2013. “The Experience of Disagreement Between Students and Supervisors in PhD Education: A Qualitative Study.” BMC Medical Education 13 (1): 134. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-13-134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurr, G. M. 2001. “Negotiating the ‘Rackety Bridge’ — A Dynamic Model for Aligning Supervisory Style with Research Student Development.” Higher Education Quarterly 20 (1): 81–92. doi:10.1080/07924360120043882.
   Google Scholar
• Gurr, G. M. 2011. “Negotiating the 'Rackety Bridge ' — a Dynamic Model for Aligning Supervisory Style with Research Student Development.” Higher Education Quarterly 20 (1): 81–92. doi:10.1080/07924360120043882.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P. T., and S. Green. 2011. “Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.” Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. www.cochrane-handbook.org.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G., G. J. Hofstede, and M. Minkov. 2010. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ives, G., and G. Rowley. 2005. “Supervisor Selection or Allocation and Continuity of Supervision: Ph.D. Students’ Progress and Outcomes.” Studies in Higher Education 30 (5): 535–555. doi:10.1080/03075070500249161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. M. 2014. “Doctorates in the Dark: Threshold Concepts and the Improvement of Doctoral Supervision.” Waikato Journal of Education 19 (2): 69–81. http://wje.org.nz/index.php/WJE/article/view/99.
   Google Scholar
• Kellmer-Langan, D. M. 2010. “Making Research Supervision Work for you.” Nurse Researcher 17 (2): 44–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim, Y. 2007. “Difficulties in Quality Doctoral Academic Advising: Experiences of Korean Students.” Journal of Research in International Education 6 (2): 171–193. doi:10.1177/1475240907078613.
   Google Scholar
• King, S. B., and F. K. Williams. 2014. “Barriers to Completing the Dissertation as Perceived by Education Leadership Doctoral Students.” Community College Journal of Research and Practice 38: 275–279.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. L., G. M. Lucas, D. C. Molden, W. L. Gardner, and K. K. Dean. 2010. “There’s no Substitute for Belonging: Self Affirmation Following Social and Non-Social Threats.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36 (2): 173–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Könings, K. D., D. Popa, M. Gerken, B. Giesbers, B. C. Rienties, C. P. M. Vleuten, and J. J. G. van Merrienboer. 2015. “Innovations in Education and Teaching International Improving Supervision for Students at a Distance: Videoconferencing for Group Meetings.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 3297: 37–41. doi:10.1080/14703297.2015.1004098.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, N. J. 2009. “Professional Doctorate Supervision: Exploring Student and Supervisor Experiences.” Nurse Education Today 29 (6): 641–648. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2009.02.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. 2012. Successful Research Supervision: Advising Students Doing Research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A., and B. Green. 2009. “Supervision as Metaphor.” Studies in Higher Education 34 (6): 615–630. doi:10.1080/03075070802597168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levett-Jones, T. 2007. “Belongingness: a Pivotal Precursor to Optimising the Learning of Nursing Students in the Clinical Environment.” Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Newcastle, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Levett-Jones, T., and J. Lathlean. 2008. “Belongingness: A Prerequisite for Nursing Students’ Clinical Learning.” Nurse Education in Practice 8: 103–111.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levett-Jones, T., J. Lathlean, I. Higgins, and M. McMillan. 2009. “Staff-student Relationships and Their Impact on Nursing Students’ Belongingness and Learning.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 65 (2): 316–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Määttä, K. 2015. “A Good Supervisor–Ten Facts of Caring Supervision.” International Education Studies 8 (9): 185–193. doi:10.5539/ies.v8n9p185.
   Google Scholar
• MacMillan, M., and I. Higgins. 2007. “Belongingness and Alienation.” Contemporary Nurse 24 (2): 163–174.
   Google Scholar
• Maor, D., and J. K. Curie. 2017. “The Use of Technology in Postgraduate Supervision Pedagogy in two Australian Universities.” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 14 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1186/s41239-017-0046-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maor, D., J. D. Ensor, and B. J. Fraser. 2015. “Doctoral Supervision in Virtual Spaces: A Review of Research of web-Based Tools to Develop Collaborative Supervision.” Higher Education Research and Development 4360: 1–17. doi:10.1080/07294360.2015.1121206.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, M. M. 2012. “Motivation, Satisfaction, and Innate Psychological Needs.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 7: 259–277.
   Google Scholar
• McCallin, A., and S. Nayar. 2012. “Teaching in Higher Education Postgraduate Research Supervision: A Critical Review of Current Practice.” Teaching in Higher Education 17 (1): 63–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesquida, A. D., and A. P. Garcius. 2015. “Online Tutoring Procedure for Research Project Supervision: Management, Organization and key Elements.” Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research 4 (2): 123–132. doi:10.7821/naer.2015.4.110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasiri, F., and F. Mafakheri. 2014. “Postgraduate Research Supervision at a Distance: a Review of Challenges and Strategies.” Studies in Higher Education 5079: 1–8. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.914906.
   Google Scholar
• Nasiri, F., and F. Mafakheri. 2015. “Postgraduate Research Supervision at a Distance: a Review of Challenges and Strategies.” Studies in Higher Education 40 (10): 1962–1969. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.914906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odena, O., and H. Burgess. 2015. “How Doctoral Students and Graduates Describe Facilitating Experiences and Strategies for Their Thesis Writing Learning Process: a Qualitative Approach.” Studies in Higher Education 5079: 1–19. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1063598.
   Google Scholar
• Orellana, M. L. 2016. “Improving Doctoral Success by Matching PhD Students with Supervisors.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 11: 87–103.
   Google Scholar
• Paliktzoglou, V., and J. Suhonen. 2011. “Part-time Online PhD Reflection: Train of Thoughts.” Procedia Computer Science 3: 149–154. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.026.
   Google Scholar
• Papastavrou, E., E. Lambrinou, H. Tsangari, M. Saarikoski, and H. Leino-Kilpie. 2010. “Student Nurses Experiences of Learning in the Clinical Environment.” Nurse Education in Practice 10 (3): 176–182.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parker-Jenkins, M. 2016. “Mind the Gap: Developing the Roles, Expectations and Boundaries in the Doctoral Supervisor–Supervisee Relationship.” Studies in Higher Education 5079 (2008): 1–15. doi:10.1080/03075079.2016.1153622.
   Google Scholar
• Pole, C. J., A. Sprokkereef, G. Robert, and E. Lakin. 1997. “Supervision of Doctoral Students in the Natural Sciences: Expectations and Experiences.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 22 (1): 49–63.
   Google Scholar
• Pyhältö, K., J. Vekkaila, and J. Keskinen. 2015. “Fit Matters in the Supervisory Relationship: Doctoral Students and Supervisors’ Perceptions About the Supervisory Activities.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 52 (1): 4–16. doi:10.1080/14703297.2014.981836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, M. J. 2017. “Team Modes and Power: Supervision of Doctoral Students.” Higher Education Research & Development 36 (2): 358–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J. 2012. “Should Online Doctoral Instructors Adopt Audio Feedback as an Instructional Strategy? Preliminary Evidence.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 7: 245–258.
   Google Scholar
• Sedgwick, M. G., and O. Yonge. 2008. “We’re it, We’re a Team, ‘We’re Family’ Means a Sense of Belonging.” International Electronic Journal of Rural and Remote Health Research, Education, Policy and Practice 8: 1–21. www.www.rrh.org.au.
   Google Scholar
• Severinsson, E. 2015. “Rights and Responsibilities in Research Supervision.” Nursing and Health Sciences 17 (2): 195–200. doi:10.1111/nhs.12160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidhu, G. K., S. Kaur, C. Y. Fook, and F. W. Yunus. 2013. “ Postgraduate Supervision: Exploring Malaysian Students’ Experiences.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 90 (InCULT 2012): 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.074.
   Google Scholar
• Spaulding, L. S., and A. J. Rockinson-Szapkiw. 2012. “Hearing Their Voices: Factors Doctoral Candidates Attribute to Their Persistence.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 7: 199–219.
   Google Scholar
• Sussex, R. 2006. “Technological Options in Supervising Remote Research Students.” Higher Education 55 (1): 121–137. doi:10.1007/s10734-006-9038-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tengberg, L. G. W. 2015. “The Agile Approach with Doctoral Dissertation Supervision.” International Education Studies 8 (11): 139. doi:10.5539/ies.v8n11p139.
   Google Scholar
• Van Schalkwyk, S. C., D. Murdoch-Eaton, A. Tekian, C. van der Vleuten, and F. Cilliers. 2016. “The Supervisor’s Toolkit: A Framework for Doctoral Supervision in Health Professions Education: AIMEE Guide No. 104.” Medical Teacher 104: 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, T., and L. Y. Li. 2011. ““Tell me What to do” vs. “Guide me Through it”: Feedback Experiences of International Doctoral Students.” Active Learning in Higher Education 12 (2): 101–112. doi:10.1177/1469787411402438.
   Google Scholar
• Winchester-Seeto, T., J. Homewood, J. Thogersen, C. Jacenyik-Trawoger, C. Manathunga, A. Reid, and A. Holbrook. 2013. “Doctoral Supervision in a Cross-Cultural Context: Issues Affecting Supervisors and Candidates.” Higher Education Research and Development 4360: 1–17. doi:10.1080/07294360.2013.841648.
   Google Scholar
• Woolderink, M., K. Putnik, H. van der Boom, and G. Klabbers. 2015. “The Voice of PhD Candidates and PhD Supervisors. A Qualitative Exploratory study Amongst PhD Candidates and Supervisors to Evaluate the Relational Aspects of PhD Supervision in the Netherlands.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 10: 217–235. http://ijds.org/Volume10/IJDSv10p217-235Woolderink0852.pdf.
   Google Scholar