References
- Adams, G. 2019. “A Narrative Study of the Experience of Feedback on a Professional Doctorate: ‘A Kind of Flowing Conversation’.” Studies in Continuing Education 41: 191–206. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2018.1526782
- Ajjawi, R., and D. Boud. 2017. “Researching Feedback Dialogue: An International Analysis Approach.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (2): 252–265. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1102863.
- Barbero, E. J. 2008. “Journal Paper Requirement for PhD Graduation.” Latin American and Caribbean Journal of Engineering Education 2: 51–53.
- Basturkmen, H., M. East, and J. Bitchener. 2014. “Supervisors’ On-Script Feedback Comments on Drafts of Dissertations: Socialising Students into the Academic Discourse Community.” Teaching in Higher Education 19: 432–445. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.752728
- Bedeian, A. G. 2003. “The Manuscript Review Process: The Proper Roles of Authors, Referees, and Editors.” Journal of Management Inquiry 12 (4): 331–338. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492603258974
- Belcher, D. D. 2007. “Seeking Acceptance in an English-Only Research World.” Journal of Second Language Writing 16: 1–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.12.001
- Boud, D., and E. Molloy. 2013. “Rethinking Models of Feedback for Learning: The Challenge of Design.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (6): 698–712. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462.
- Cargill, M., and P. O'Connor. 2013. Writing Scientific Research Articles: Strategy and Steps. 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
- Carless, D., and D. Boud. 2018. “The Development of Student Feedback Literacy: Enabling Uptake of Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (8): 1315–1325. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354.
- Cheung, Y. L. 2010. “First Publications in Refereed English Journals: Difficulties, Coping Strategies, and Recommendations for Student Straining.” System 38: 134–141. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.12.012
- Cho, S. 2009. “Challenges of Entering Discourse Communities Through Publishing in English: Perspectives of Nonnative-Speaking Doctoral Students in the United States of America.” Journal of Language, Identity, and Education 3 (1): 47–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327701jlie0301_3
- Ellis, R. 2010. “A Framework for Investigating Oral and Written Corrective Feedback.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32: 335–349. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990544
- Englander, K. 2006. “Revision of Scientific Manuscripts by Nonnative-English-Speaking Scientists in Response to Journal Editors’ Criticism of the Language.” Journal of Applied Linguistics 3 (2): 129–161.
- Fisher, R., and W. Ury. 2011. Getting to Yes: Negotiating an Agreement Without Giving in. New York: Random House.
- Flowerdew, J. 2011. “Action, Content and Identity in Applied Genre Analysis for ESP.” Language Teaching 44 (4): 516–528. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144481000042X
- Flowerdew, J., and S. H. Wang. 2016. “Author’s Editor Revisions to Manuscripts Published in International Journals.” Journal of Second Language Writing 32: 39–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.03.004
- Forsyth, D. R. 2008. “Self-serving Bias.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. 2nd ed, Vol. 7., edited by W. A. Darity. New York: Macmillan.
- Gibson, M., C. Y. Spong, S. E. Simonsen, S. Martin, and J. R. Scott. 2008. “Author Perception of Peer Review.” Obstetrics and Gynecology 112 (3): 646–651. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818425d4
- Gosden, H. 2003. “‘Why Not Give Us the Full Story?’: Functions of Referees’ Comments in Peer Reviews of Scientific Research Papers.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2 (2): 87–101. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00037-1
- Gravett, K., I. Kinchin, N. Winstone, K. Balloo, M. Heron, A. Hosein, and E. Medland. 2019. “The Development of Academics’ Feedback Literacy: Experiences of Learning from Critical Feedback via Scholarly Peer Review.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1686749.
- Gunuc, S., and A. Kuzu. 2015. “Student Engagement Scale: Development, Reliability and Validity.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 40: 587–610. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.938019
- Han, Y., and F. Hyland. 2015. “Exploring Learner Engagement with Written Corrective Feedback in a Chinese Tertiary EFL Classroom.” Journal of Second Language Writing 30: 31–44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.002
- Hardre, P. L. 2013. “The Power and Strategic Art of Revise-and-Resubmit: Maintaining Balance in Academic Publishing.” Journal of Faculty Development 27 (1): 13–19.
- Hewings, M. 2004. “An ‘Important Contribution’ or ‘Tiresome Reading’? A Study of Evaluation in Peer Reviews of Journal Article Submissions.” Journal of Applied Linguistics 1 (3): 247–274. doi: https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.2004.1.3.247
- Hyland, K. 2001. “Bringing in the Reader: Addressee Features in Academic Articles.” Written Communication 18 (4): 549–574. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088301018004005
- Hyland, K. 2003. Second Language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Hyland, K. 2012. Disciplinary identities: Individuality and community in academic discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Hyland, K., and F. Jiang. 2020. “‘This Work is Antithetical to the Spirit of Research’: An Anatomy of Harsh Peer Reviews.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100867.
- Lee, C. J., C. R. Sugimoto, G. Zhang, and B. Cronin. 2013. “Bias in Peer Review.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64 (1): 2–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22784
- Lei, J. 2019. “Neoliberal Ideologies in a Chinese University’s Requirements and Rewards Schemes for Doctoral Publication.” Studies in Continuing Education. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2019.1672638.
- Lei, J., and G. Hu. 2019. “Doctoral Candidates’ Dual Role as Student and Expert Scholarly Writer: An Activity Theory Perspective.” English for Specific Purposes 54: 62–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.12.003
- Li, Y. 2006. “Negotiating Knowledge Contribution to Multiple Discourse Communities: A Doctoral Student of Computer Science Writing for Publication.” Journal of Second Language Writing 15 (3): 159–178. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.07.001
- Li, Y., and J. Flowerdew. 2007. “Shaping Chinese Novice Scientists’ Manuscripts for Publication.” Journal of Second Language Writing 16 (2): 100–117. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.05.001
- Liu, L. A. 2014. “Addressing Reviewer Comments as an Integrative Negotiation.” Management and Organization Review 10 (2): 183–190. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1740877600004125
- Maher, M., A. Fallucca, and H. Halasz. 2013. “Write on! Through to the Ph.D.: Using Writing Groups to Facilitate Doctoral Degree Progress.” Studies in Continuing Education 35: 193–208. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2012.736381
- Mahfoodh, O. 2017. “‘I Feel Disappointed’: EFL University Students’ Emotional Responses Towards Teacher Written Feedback.” Assessing Writing 31: 53–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2016.07.001
- Miles, M., M. Huberman, and J. Saldana. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Mungra, P., and P. Webber. 2010. “Peer Review Process in Medical Research Publications: Language and Content Comments.” English for Specific Purposes 29 (1): 43–53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2009.07.002
- Stracke, E., and V. Kumar. 2014. “Realising Graduate Attributes in the Research Degree: The Role of Peer Support Groups.” Teaching in Higher Education 19: 616–629. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2014.901955
- Tharirian, M. H., and E. Sadri. 2013. “Peer Reviewers’ Comments on Research Articles Submitted by Iranian Researchers.” The Journal of Teaching Language Skills 5 (3): 107–123.
- Tillema, H., M. Leenknecht, and M. Segers. 2011. “Assessing Assessment Quality: Criteria for Quality Assurance in Design of (Peer) Assessment for Learning – A Review of Research Studies.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 37 (1): 25–34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.004
- Weber, E. J., P. P. Katz, J. F. Waeckerle, and M. L. Callaham. 2002. “Author Perception of Peer Review: Impact of Review Quality and Acceptance on Satisfaction.” JAMA 287 (21): 210–213. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.21.2790
- Winstone, N., and D. Boud. 2019. “Exploring Cultures of Feedback Practice: The Adoption of Learning-Focused Feedback Practices in the UK and Australia.” Higher Education Research & Development 38 (2): 411–425. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1532985
- Winstone, N. E., R. A. Nash, J. Rowntree, and M. Parker. 2017. “‘It’d be Useful, but I Wouldn’t Use It’: Barriers to University Students’ Feedback Seeking and Recipience.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (11): 2026–2041. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1130032
- Xu, L., and B. Grant. 2020. “Doctoral Publishing and Academic Identity Work: Two Cases.” Higher Education Research & Development. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1728522.
- Xu, L., L. Teng, and J. Cai. 2020. “Feedback Engagement of Chinese International Doctoral Students.” Studies in Continuing Education. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2020.1718634.
- Yin, R. K. 2003. Case Study Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Yin, H., and W. Wang. 2016. “Undergraduate Students’ Motivation and Engagement in China: An Exploratory Study.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 41: 601–621. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1037240
- Yu, S., Y. Zhang, Y. Zheng, K. Yuan, and L. Zhang. 2018. “Understanding Student Engagement with Peer Feedback on Master’s Theses: A Macau Study.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 44 (1): 50–65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1467879
- Zhang, Z. 2017. “Student Engagement with Computer-Generated Feedback: A Case Study.” ELT Journal 71: 317–328. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw118
- Zhang, Z., and K. Hyland. 2018. “Student Engagement with Teacher and Automated Feedback on L2 Writing.” Assessing Writing 36: 90–102. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.004
- Zheng, Y., and S. Yu. 2018. “Student Engagement with Teacher Written Corrective Feedback in EFL Writing: A Case Study of Chinese Lower-Proficiency Students.” Assessing Writing 37: 13–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.001