Traffic noise alters individual social connectivity, but not space-use, of Red-backed Fairywrens

References

• Alario, P., Gamallo, A., Beato, M. J., and Trancho, G. (1987). Body weight gain, food intake and adrenal development in chronic noise stressed rats. Physiology & Behavior 40, 29–32. doi:10.1016/0031-9384(87)90181-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amy, M., Sprau, P., De Goede, P., and Naguib, M. (2010). Effects of personality on territory defence in communication networks: A playback experiment with radio-tagged great tits. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 277(1700), 3685–3692. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aplin, L. M., Farine, D. R., Morand-Ferron, J., and Sheldon, B. C. (2012). Social networks predict patch discovery in a wild population of songbirds. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 279, 4199–4205. doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.1591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldassarre, D. T., Greig, E. I., Webster, M. S., Griffith, S., Owens, I., Thuman, K., Kokko, H., et al. (2016). The couple that sings together stays together: Duetting, aggression and extrapair paternity in a promiscuous bird species. Biology Letters 12, 1–4. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2015.1025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blickley, J. L., Word, K. R., Krakauer, A. H., Phillips, J. L., Sells, S. N., Taff, C. C., Wingfield, J. C., et al. (2012). Experimental chronic noise is related to elevated fecal corticosteroid metabolites in lekking male greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus). PLoS ONE 7(11), e50462. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brumm, H., and Naguib, M. (2009). ‘Environmental Acoustics and the Evolution of Bird Song,’ 1st. Advances in the Study of Behavior. (Academic Press Inc: Cambridge, MA). doi:10.1016/S0065-3454(09)40001-9
   Google Scholar
• Buxton, R. T., McKenna, M. F., Mennitt, D., Fristrup, K., Crooks, K., Angeloni, L., and Wittemyer, G. (2017). Noise pollution is pervasive in U.S. protected areas. Science 356(6337), 531–533. doi:10.1126/science.aah4783
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairns, S. J., and Schwager, S. J. (1987). A comparison of association indices. Animal Behaviour 35(5), 1454–1469. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(87)80018-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartwright, L. A., Taylor, D. R., Wilson, D. R., and Chow-Fraser, P. (2014). Urban noise affects song structure and daily patterns of song production in Red-winged Blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus). Urban Ecosystems 17(2), 561–572. doi:10.1007/s11252-013-0318-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chloupek, P., Voslářová, E., Chloupek, J., Bedáňová, I., Pištěková, V., and Večerek, V. (2009). Stress in broiler chickens due to acute noise exposure. Acta Veterinaria Brno 78, 93–98. doi:10.2754/avb200978010093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crino, O. L., Van Oorschot, B. K., Johnson, E. E., Malisch, J. L., and Breuner, C. W. (2011). Proximity to a high traffic road: Glucocorticoid and life history consequences for nestling white-crowned sparrows. General and Comparative Endocrinology 173(2), 323–332. doi:10.1016/j.ygcen.2011.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csárdi, G., and Nepusz, T. (2006). The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal Complex Systems 1695, 1–9. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1087.2009.02191
   Google Scholar
• Derryberry, E. P., Danner, R. M., Danner, J. E., Derryberry, G. E., Phillips, J. N., Lipshutz, S. E., Gentry, K., et al. (2016). Patterns of song across natural and anthropogenic soundscapes suggest that white-crowned sparrows minimize acoustic masking and maximize signal content. PLoS ONE 11(4), 1–17. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0154456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling, J. L., and Webster, M. S. (2013). The form and function of duets and choruses in Red-backed Fairy-wrens. Emu - Austral Ornithology 113(3), 282–293. doi:10.1071/MU12082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farine, D. R., Whitehead, H., and Altizer, S. (2015). Constructing, conducting and interpreting animal social network analysis. Journal of Animal Ecology 84(5), 1144–1163. doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Juricic, E., Poston, R., De Collibus, K., Morgan, T., Bastain, B., Martin, C., Jones, K., et al. (2005). Microhabitat selection and singing behavior patterns of male house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus) in urban parks in a heavily urbanized landscape in the Western U.S. Urban Habitats 3, 49–69.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, C. D., Ortega, C. P., and Cruz, A. (2011). Noise pollution filters bird communities based on vocal frequency. PLoS ONE 6(11), e27052. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, R. A., Warren, P. H., and Gaston, K. J. (2007). Daytime noise predicts nocturnal singing in urban robins. Biology Letters 3, 368–370. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2007.0134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geffroy, B., Bru, N., Dossou-Gbété, S., Tentelier, C., and Bardonnet, A. (2014). The link between social network density and rank-order consistency of aggressiveness in juvenile eels. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 68(7), 1073–1083. doi:10.1007/s00265-014-1719-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabowska-Zhang, A. M., Wilkin, T. A., and Sheldon, B. C. (2012). Effects of neighbor familiarity on reproductive success in the great tit (Parus major). Behavioral Ecology 23(2), 322–333. doi:10.1093/beheco/arr189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halfwerk, W., Holleman, L. J. M., Lessells, C. M., and Slabbekoorn, H. (2011). Negative impact of traffic noise on avian reproductive success. Journal of Applied Ecology 48, 210–219. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01914.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halfwerk, W., and van Oers, K. (2020). Anthropogenic noise impairs foraging for cryptic prey via cross-sensory interference. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 287(1924), 20192951. doi:10.1098/rspb.2019.2951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbert-Read, J. E., Kremer, L., Bruintjes, R., Radford, A. N., and Ioannou, C. C. (2017). Anthropogenic noise pollution from pile-driving disrupts the structure and dynamics of fish shoals. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 284(1863), 20171627. doi:10.1098/rspb.2017.1627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Injaian, A. S., Poon, L. Y., and Patricelli, G. L. (2018). Effects of experimental anthropogenic noise on avian settlement patterns and reproductive success. Behavioral Ecology 29(5), 1181–1189. doi:10.1093/beheco/ary097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, J. M., and Radford, A. N. (2016). Anthropogenic noise disrupts use of vocal information about predation risk. Environmental Pollution 218, 988–995. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2016.08.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleist, N. J., Guralnick, R. P., Cruz, A., and Francis, C. D. (2016). Anthropogenic noise weakens territorial response to intruder’s songs. Ecosphere 7(3), 1–11. doi:10.1002/ecs2.1259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleist, N. J., Guralnick, R. P., Cruz, A., Lowry, C. A., and Francis, C. D. (2018). Chronic anthropogenic noise disrupts glucocorticoid signaling and has multiple effects on fitness in an avian community. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115(4), E648–E657. doi:10.1073/pnas.1709200115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantz, S. M., and Karubian, J. (2017). Environmental disturbance increases social connectivity in a passerine bird. PLoS ONE 12(8), 1–15. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0183144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lengagne, T. (2008). Traffic noise affects communication behaviour in a breeding anuran, Hyla arborea. Biological Conservation 141(8), 2023–2031. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry, H., Lill, A., and Wong, B. B. M. (2019). Do the calls of a bird, the noisy miner (Manorina melanocephala), need adjustment for efficient communication in Urban anthropogenic noise? Animals 9(3), 118. doi:10.3390/ani9030118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahjoub, G., Hinders, M. K., and Swaddle, J. P. (2015). Using a ‘sonic net’ to deter pest bird species: Excluding European starlings from food sources by disrupting their acoustic communication. Wildlife Society Bulletin 39(2), 326–333. doi:10.1002/wsb.529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maldonado-Coelho, M., and Marini, M. Â. (2004). Mixed-species bird flocks from Brazilian Atlantic forest: The effects of forest fragmentation and seasonality on their size, richness and stability. Biological Conservation 116(1), 19–26. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00169-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meillere, A., Brischoux, F., and Angelier, F. (2015). Impact of chronic noise exposure on antipredator behavior: An experiment in breeding house sparrows. Behavioral Ecology 26(2), 569–577. doi:10.1093/beheco/aru232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokross, K., Ryder, T. B., Côrtes, M. C., Wolfe, J. D., and Stouffer, P. C. (2014). Decay of interspecific avian flock networks along a disturbance gradient in Amazonia. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281, 1–10. doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.2599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulder, R. A., and Magrath, M. J. L. (1994). Timing of prenuptial molt as a sexually selected indicator of male quality in superb fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus). Behavioral Ecology 5(4), 393–400. doi:10.1093/beheco/5.4.393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osmun, A. E., and Mennill, D. J. (2011). Acoustic monitoring reveals congruent patterns of territorial singing behaviour in male and female tropical wrens. Ethology 117, 385–394. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2011.01887.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otter, K., McGregor, P. K., Terry, A. M. R., Burford, F. R. L., Peake, T. M., and Dabelsteen, T. (1999). Do female great tits (Parus major) assess males by eavesdropping? A field study using interactive song playback. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 266(1426), 1305–1309. doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouis, D. (1999). Exposure to nocturnal road traffic noise: sleep disturbance and its after effects. Noise Health 1 (4), 11–36.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, J. L., Stec, C. L., and O’Hatnick, A. (2012). The effects of extended exposure to traffic noise on parid social and risk-taking behavior. Behavioural Processes 91(1), 61–69. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2012.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, J. N., and Derryberry, E. P. (2018). Urban sparrows respond to a sexually selected trait with increased aggression in noise. Scientific Reports 8(1), 1–10. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-25834-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl, N. U., Slabbekoorn, H., Klump, G. M., and Langemann, U. (2009). Effects of signal features and environmental noise on signal detection in the great tit, Parus major. Animal Behaviour 78(6), 1293–1300. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potvin, D. A., Parris, K. M., and Mulder, R. A. (2011). Geographically pervasive effects of urban noise on frequency and syllable rate of songs and calls in silvereyes (Zosterops lateralis). Proceedings. Biological sciences/The Royal Society 278(1717), 561–572. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.2296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Python Core Team. (2015), ‘Python: A dynamic, open source programming language.’ Python software foundation. Available at https://www.python.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, J. L., Whittingham, M. J., Butler, S. J., Cresswell, W., Quinn, J. L., Whittingham, M. J., Butler, S. J., et al. (2017). Noise, predation risk compensation and vigilance in the Chaffinch Fringilla coelebs. Nordic Society Oikos 37, 601–608.
   Google Scholar
• Rabin, L. A., Coss, R. G., and Owings, D. H. (2006). The effects of wind turbines on antipredator behavior in California ground squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi). Biological Conservation 131(3), 410–420. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.02.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowley, I., and Russell, E. (1990). Philandering “ - a mixed mating strategy in the splendid fairy-wren MMurus splendens. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 27(6), 431–437. doi:10.1007/BF00164070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowley, I., and Russell, E. (1997). ‘Fairy-Wrens and Grasswrens: Maluridae.’ (Oxford University Press Inc.: Oxford, UK)
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R., Morrison, A., and Kunc, H. P. (2014). Sexy voices - no choices: Male song in noise fails to attract females. Animal Behaviour 94, 55–59. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.05.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singmann, H., Bolker, B., Westfall, J., Aust, F., and Ben-Schachar, M. S. (2020). ‘Afex: Analysis of Factorial Experiments.’ R package version 0.28-0. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/afex/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Skroblin, A., and Murphy, S. A. (2013). The conservation status of Australian malurids and their value as models in understanding land-management issues. Emu 113(3), 309–318. doi:10.1071/MU12075
   Google Scholar
• Slabbekoorn, H. (2013). Songs of the city: Noise-dependent spectral plasticity in the acoustic phenotype of urban birds. Animal Behaviour 85, 1089–1099. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slabbekoorn, H., and Peet, M. (2003). Birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise. Nature 424(6946), 267. doi:10.1038/424267a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slabbekoorn, H., and Ripmeester, E. A. P. (2008). Birdsong and anthropogenic noise: Implications and applications for conservation. Molecular Ecology 17, 72–83. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03487.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders, L., van Rooij, E. P., Burt, J. M., Hinde, C. A., van Oers, K., and Naguib, M. (2014). Social networking in territorial great tits: Slow explorers have the least central social network positions. Animal Behaviour 98, 95–102. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.09.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnenschein, E., and Reyer, H. U. (1983). Mate‐guarding and other functions of antiphonal duets in the slate‐coloured boubou (Laniarius funebris). Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 63(2–3), 112–140. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1983.tb00083.x
   Google Scholar
• Swaddle, J. P., Moseley, D. L., Hinders, M. K., and Elizabeth, S. P. (2016). A sonic net excludes birds from an airfield: Implications for reducing bird strike and crop losses. Ecological Applications 26(2), 339–345. doi:10.1890/07-1650.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaddle, J. P., and Page, L. C. (2007). High levels of environmental noise erode pair preferences in zebra finches: Implications for noise pollution. Animal Behaviour. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarvin, K. A., Webster, M. S., Tuttle, E. M., and Pruett-Jones, S. (2005). Genetic similarity of social mates predicts the level of extrapair paternity in splendid fairy-wrens. Animal Behaviour 70(4), 945–955. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varian-Ramos, C. W., and Webster, M. S. (2012). Extrapair copulations reduce inbreeding for female red-backed fairy-wrens, Malurus melanocephalus. Animal Behaviour 83(3), 857–864. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware, H. E., McClure, C. J. W., Carlisle, J. D., and Barber, J. R. (2015). A phantom road experiment reveals traffic noise is an invisible source of habitat degradation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 112(39), 201504710. doi:10.1073/pnas.1504710112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead, H. (2008) . ‘Analyzing Animal Societies: Quantitative Methods for Vertebrate Social Analysis.’ (University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL)
   Google Scholar
• Worton, B. (1989). Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies author (s): B. J. Worton published by : Wiley on behalf of the ecological society of America stable. Ecology 70 (1), 164–168. doi:10.2307/1938423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar