Nest predation in Patagonian wetlands: predator assemblage and microhabitat characteristics

References

• Albrecht, T. (2004). Edge effect in wetland-arable land boundary determines nesting success of scarlet rosefinches (Carpodacus erythrinus) in the Czech Republic. The Auk 121(2), 361–371. doi:10.1642/0004-8038(2004)121[0361:EEIWLB]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrecht, T., Hořák, D., Kreisinger, J., Weidinger, K., Klvaňa, P., and Michot, T. C. (2006). Factors determining pochard nest predation along a wetland gradient. The Journal of Wildlife Management 70(3), 784–791. doi:10.2193/0022-541X(2006)70[784:FDPNPA]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballari, S. A., Cuevas, M. F., Ojeda, R. A., and Navarro, J. L. (2015). Diet of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in a protected area of Argentina: The importance of baiting. Mammal Research 60(1), 81–87. doi:10.1007/s13364-014-0202-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateman, P., Fleming, P., and Wolfe, A. (2017). A different kind of ecological modelling: The use of clay model organisms to explore predator–prey interactions in vertebrates. Journal of Zoology 301(4), 251–262. doi:10.1111/jzo.12415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., and Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1), 1–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy, P. E., Burgess, M. D., Mallord, J. W., Cristinacce, A., Orsman, C. J., Davis, T., Grice, P. V., et al. (2018). Nest predation and the influence of habitat structure on nest predation of Wood Warbler Phylloscopus sibilatrix, a ground-nesting forest passerine. Journal of Ornithology 159(2), 493–506. doi:10.1007/s10336-017-1527-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bran, D., Ayesa, J., and López, C. (2002). Áreas ecológicas de Neuquén. Informe Laboratorio De Teledetección-SIG N°4-INTA-EEA Bariloche.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M., Turbek, S. P., Pasian, C., and Di Giacomo, A. S. (2021). Low reproductive success of the endangered Iberá Seedeater in its only known breeding site, the Iberá Wetlands, Argentina. The Condor 123(2), 1–12. doi:10.1093/ornithapp/duab008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiaradia, N. M., Isacch, J. P., Pretelli, M. G., and Cardoni, D. A. (2019). Multiple factors associated with nest-site selection in a wetland-specialist, the Wren-like Rushbird (Phleocryptes melanops). Emu-Austral Ornithology 119(4), 355–363. doi:10.1080/01584197.2019.1599960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombelli‐Négrel, D., and Kleindorfer, S. (2009). Nest height, nest concealment, and predator type predict nest predation in superb fairy‐wrens (Malurus cyaneus). Ecological Research 24(4), 921–928. doi:10.1007/s11284-008-0569-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo, M. A., Jauregui, A., Gonzalez, E., and Segura, L. N. (2021). Nesting biology and nest survival of the Grassland Sparrow (Ammodramus humeralis) in grazed grasslands of central-eastern Argentina. Neotropical Biodiversity 7(1), 67–74. doi:10.1080/23766808.2021.1888625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppedge, B. R., Talent, L. G., and Engle, D. M. (2007). Effects of olfactory attributes and size of egg on rates of predation of artificial ground nests in tallgrass prairie. The Southwestern Naturalist 52(4), 453–460. doi:10.1894/0038-4909(2007)52[453:EOOAAS]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cossa, N. A., Gallo, J. A., Fasola, L., Roesler, I., and Abba, A. M. (2021). Registro de depredación del peludo, Chaetophractus villosus (Desmarest, 1804), sobre un nido de cauquén común, Chloephaga picta, en el noroeste de Santa Cruz. Notas sobre Mamíferos Sudamericanos 3, e21.11.3.
   Google Scholar
• Crego, R. D., Didier, K. A., and Nielsen, C. K. (2014). Modeling meadow distribution for conservation action in arid and semi-arid Patagonia, Argentina. Journal of Arid Environments 102, 68–75. doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2013.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cremona, M. V., and Enriquez, A. S. (2015). Los mallines de Patagonia Norte: sus funciones productivas y ambientales. Presencia. Serie de divulgación N°1 63, 9–13.
   Google Scholar
• de la Peña, M. (2013). ‘Nidos y reproducción de las aves argentinas.’ (Ediciones Biológica. Serie Naturaleza, Conservación y Sociedad N° 8: Santa Fe, Argentina.)
   Google Scholar
• de Zwaan, D. R., and Martin, K. (2018). Substrate and structure of ground nests have fitness consequences for an alpine songbird. Ibis 160(4), 790–804. doi:10.1111/ibi.12582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dion, N., Hobson, K. A., and Larivière, S. (2000). Interactive effects of vegetation and predators on the success of natural and simulated nests of grassland songbirds. The Condor 102(3), 629–634. doi:10.1093/condor/102.3.629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodonov, P., Paneczko, I. T., and Telles, M. (2017). Edge, height and visibility effects on nest predation by birds and mammals in the Brazilian cerrado. Acta Oecologica 83, 56–64. doi:10.1016/j.actao.2017.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epele, L. B., Grech, M. G., Manzo, L. M., Macchi, P. A., Hermoso, V., Miserendino, M. L., Bonada, N., et al. (2021). Identifying high priority conservation areas for Patagonian wetlands biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation 30(5), 1359–1374. doi:10.1007/s10531-021-02146-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faaborg, J. (2004). Truly artificial nest studies. Conservation Biology 18(2), 369–370. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00486.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández, G. J., and Reboreda, J. C. (1998). Effects of clutch size and timing of breeding on reproductive success of greater rheas. The Auk 115(2), 340–348. doi:10.2307/4089192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazer, G. W., Canham, C., and Lertzman, K. (1999). Gap Light Analyzer (GLA), Version 2.0: Imaging software to extract canopy structure and gap light transmission indices from true-colour fisheye photographs, users manual and program documentation. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, and the Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, New York 36.
   Google Scholar
• Galende, G. I., Troncoso, A., and Lambertucci, S. A. (2013). Effects of coypu (Myocastor coypus) abundances and diet selection on a wetland of the Patagonian steppe. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 48(1), 32–39. doi:10.1080/01650521.2012.753740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, S. L., and Ghermandi, L. (2021). Overgrazing causes a reduction in the vegetation cover and seed bank of Patagonian grasslands. Plant and Soil 464(1), 75–87. doi:10.1007/s11104-021-04931-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halupka, K., and Greeney, H. F. (2009). The influence of parental behavior on vulnerability to nest predation in tropical thrushes of an Andean cloud forest. Journal of Avian Biology 40(6), 658–661. doi:10.1111/j.1600-048X.2009.04772.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holopainen, S., Väänänen, V.-M., and Fox, A. D. (2020). Landscape and habitat affect frequency of artificial duck nest predation by native species, but not by an alien predator. Basic and Applied Ecology 48, 52–60. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2020.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, D. J., Phillips, M. L., Koford, R. R., Clark, W. R., Sovada, M. A., and Greenwood, R. J. (2005). Landscape composition, patch size, and distance to edges: Interactions affecting duck reproductive success. Ecological Applications 15(4), 1367–1376. doi:10.1890/03-5254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibañez‐Álamo, J. D., Sanllorente, O., and Soler, M. (2012). The impact of researcher disturbance on nest predation rates: A meta‐analysis. Ibis 154(1), 5–14. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2011.01186.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibarra, J. T., Fasola, L., Macdonald, D. W., Rozzi, R., and Bonacic, C. (2009). Invasive American mink Mustela vison in wetlands of the Cape Horn Biosphere Reserve, southern Chile: What are they eating? Oryx 43(1), 87–90. doi:10.1017/S0030605308099997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jedlikowski, J., Brzeziński, M., and Chibowski, P. (2015). Habitat variables affecting nest predation rates at small ponds: A case study of the Little Crake Porzana parva and Water Rail Rallus aquaticus. Bird Study 62(2), 190–201. doi:10.1080/00063657.2015.1031080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jedlikowski, J., Chibowski, P., Karasek, T., and Brambilla, M. (2016). Multi-scale habitat selection in highly territorial bird species: Exploring the contribution of nest, territory and landscape levels to site choice in breeding rallids (Aves: Rallidae). Acta Oecologica 73, 10–20. doi:10.1016/j.actao.2016.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junk, W. J. (2013). Current state of knowledge regarding South America wetlands and their future under global climate change. Aquatic Sciences 75(1), 113–131. doi:10.1007/s00027-012-0253-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubelka, V., Šálek, M., Tomkovich, P., Végvári, Z., Freckleton, R. P., and Székely, T. (2018). Global pattern of nest predation is disrupted by climate change in shorebirds. Science 362(6415), 680–683. doi:10.1126/science.aat8695
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liljesthröm, M., Fasola, L., Valenzuela, A., Rey, A. R., and Schiavini, A. (2014). Nest predators of flightless steamer-ducks (Tachyeres pteneres) and flying steamer-ducks (Tachyeres patachonicus). Waterbirds 37(2), 210–214. doi:10.1675/063.037.0209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, T. P., Miller, J. R., Debinski, D. M., and Engle, D. M. (2015). Predator identity influences the effect of habitat management on nest predation. Ecological Applications 25(6), 1596–1605. doi:10.1890/14-1641.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Major, R. E. (1990). The effect of human observers on the intensity of nest predation. Ibis 132(4), 608–612. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.1990.tb00285.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Major, R. E., and Kendal, C. E. (1996). The contribution of artificial nest experiments to understanding avian reproductive success: A review of methods and conclusions. Ibis 138(2), 298–307. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.1996.tb04342.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, T. E. (1993). Nest predation among vegetation layers and habitat types: Revising the dogmas. The American Naturalist 141(6), 897–913. doi:10.1086/285515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, T. E., and Geupel, G. R. (1993). Nest-monitoring plots: Methods for locating nests and monitoring success. Journal of Field Ornithology 64(4), 507–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mermoz, M., Úbeda, C., Grigera, D., Brion, C., Martín, C., Bianchi, E., and Planas, H. (2009). El Parque Nacional Nahuel Huapi. Sus características ecológicas y su estado de conservación. Administración de Parques Nacionales, San Carlos de Bariloche, Argentina 80.
   Google Scholar
• Montevecchi, W. A. (1976). Egg size and the egg predatory behaviour of crows. Behaviour 57(3), 307–320. doi:10.1163/156853976X00587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noske, R. A., Fischer, S., and Brook, B. W. (2008). Artificial nest predation rates vary among habitats in the Australian monsoon tropics. Ecological Research 23(3), 519–527. doi:10.1007/s11284-007-0403-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paramidani, M., Doffigny, C., and Codesal, P. (2014). Estudio inicial de Pastizales Ea. ‘Fortín Chacabuco.‘ 28. (Buenos Aires: Ovis XXI SA.)
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, O. (1995). Annotated keys for identifying small mammals living in or near Nahuel Huapi National Park, southern Argentina. Journal of Neotropical Mammalogy 2, 99–148.
   Google Scholar
• Peluc, S. I., Sillett, T. S., Rotenberry, J. T., and Ghalambor, C. K. (2008). Adaptive phenotypic plasticity in an island songbird exposed to a novel predation risk. Behavioral Ecology 19(4), 830–835. doi:10.1093/beheco/arn033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pescador, M., Díaz, S., and Peris, S. (2012). Abundances of waterbird species on lakes in Argentine Patagonia as a function of season, lake size and the presence of mink. Hydrobiologia 697(1), 111–125. doi:10.1007/s10750-012-1175-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Povedano, H. E., and Bisheimer, M. V. (2016). ‘Aves terrestres de la Patagonia: Tierra del Fuego e Islas del Atlántico Sur.‘ (Trama S.A.: Neuquén, Argentina.)
   Google Scholar
• Pretelli, M. G., Cavalli, M., Chiaradia, N. M., Cardoni, A., and Isacch, J. P. (2022). Location matters: Survival of artificial nests is higher in small grassland patches and near the patch edge. Ibis. doi:10.1111/ibi.13128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, M. (2008). The impact of human disturbance on Birds: A selective review. In ‘Too Close for Comfort: Contentious Issues in Human-Wildlife Encounters.’ (Eds D. Lunney, A. Munn and W. Meikle.) pp. 163–196. (Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales: Mosman, NSW, Australia.)
   Google Scholar
• Randler, C., and Kalb, N. (2018). Distance and size matters: A comparison of six wildlife camera traps and their usefulness for wild birds. Ecology and Evolution 8(14), 7151–7163. doi:10.1002/ece3.4240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rangen, S. A., Clark, R. G., and Hobson, K. A. (1999). Influence of nest-site vegetation and predator community on the success of artificial songbird nests. Canadian Journal of Zoology 77(11), 1676–1681. doi:10.1139/z99-141
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2019). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Reis, V., Hermoso, V., Hamilton, S. K., Ward, D., Fluet-Chouinard, E., Lehner, B., and Linke, S. (2017). A global assessment of inland wetland conservation status. Bioscience 67(6), 523–533. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricklefs, R. E. (1969). An analysis of nesting mortality in birds. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 9(9), 1–48. doi:10.5479/si.00810282.9
   Google Scholar
• Ringelman, K. M., Walker, J., Ringelman, J. K., and Stephens, S. E. (2018). Temporal and multi-spatial environmental drivers of duck nest survival. The Auk: Ornithological Advances 135(3), 486–494. doi:10.1642/AUK-17-207.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahin, C. (2016). Comparison and calibration of mobile phone fisheye lens and regular fisheye lens via equidistant model. Journal of Sensors 2016(9379203), 1–11. doi:10.1155/2016/9379203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanguinetti, J., Buria, L., Malmierca, L., Valenzuela, A. E., Núñez, C., Pastore, H., Chauchard, L., et al. (2014). Manejo de especies exóticas invasoras en Patagonia, Argentina: Priorización, logros y desafíos de integración entre ciencia y gestión identificados desde la Administración de Parques Nacionales. Ecología austral 24(2), 183–192. doi:10.25260/EA.14.24.2.0.21
   Google Scholar
• Schüttler, E., Klenke, R., McGehee, S., Rozzi, R., and Jax, K. (2009). Vulnerability of ground-nesting waterbirds to predation by invasive American mink in the Cape Horn Biosphere Reserve, Chile. Biological Conservation 142(7), 1450–1460. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sládeček, M., Kubelka, V., Mlíkovský, J., and Šálek, M. (2014). Coping with nest predation risk in a species-rich bird community inhabiting a Siberian wetland. Journal of Vertebrate Biology 63(4), 256–268.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, S. E., Koons, D. N., Rotella, J. J., and Willey, D. W. (2004). Effects of habitat fragmentation on avian nesting success: A review of the evidence at multiple spatial scales. Biological Conservation 115(1), 101–110. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00098-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, S. E., Rotella, J. J., Lindberg, M. S., Taper, M. L., and Ringelman, J. K. (2005). Duck nest survival in the Missouri Coteau of North Dakota: Landscape effects at multiple spatial scales. Ecological Applications 15(6), 2137–2149. doi:10.1890/04-1162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suvorov, P., Svobodová, J., and Albrecht, T. (2014). Habitat edges affect patterns of artificial nest predation along a wetland-meadow boundary. Acta Oecologica 59, 91–96. doi:10.1016/j.actao.2014.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suvorov, P., Svobodová, J., Koubová, M., and Dohnalová, L. (2012). Ground nest depredation by European Black-billed Magpies Pica pica: An experimental study with artificial nests. Acta Ornithologica 47(1), 55–61. doi:10.3161/000164512X653926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, L., Sanyaolu, R. A., Gnoske, T., Whelan, C. J., Lonsdorf, E. V., and Cordeiro, N. J. (2012). Differential response of nest predators to the presence of a decoy parent in artificial nests. Bird Study 59(1), 96–101. doi:10.1080/00063657.2011.645799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vazquez, M. S., Rodríguez-Cabal, M. A., Gonzalez, D. V., Pacheco, G. S., and Amico, G. C. (2018). Different nest predator guild associated with egg size in the Patagonian temperate forest. Bird Study 65(4), 478–483. doi:10.1080/00063657.2018.1555572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vazquez, M. S., Zamora-Nasca, L. B., Rodriguez-Cabal, M. A., and Amico, G. C. (2021). Interactive effects of habitat attributes and predator identity explain avian nest predation patterns. Emu-Austral Ornithology 121(3), 250–260. doi:10.1080/01584197.2021.1928519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weidinger, K. (2002). Interactive effects of concealment, parental behaviour and predators on the survival of open passerine nests. Journal of Animal Ecology 71(3), 424–437. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00611.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weidinger, K. (2010). Foraging behaviour of nest predators at open-cup nests of woodland passerines. Journal of Ornithology 151(3), 729–735. doi:10.1007/s10336-010-0512-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whelan, C. J., Dilger, M. L., Robson, D., Hallyn, N., and Dilger, S. (1994). Effects of olfactory cues on artificial-nest experiments. The Auk 111(4), 945–952. doi:10.2307/4088826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanette, L. (2002). What do artificial nests tells us about nest predation? Biological Conservation 103(3), 323–329. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00143-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zedler, J. B., and Kercher, S. (2005). Wetland resources: Status, trends, ecosystem services, and restorability. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30(1), 39–74. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar