References
- Barker, S., Fielder, B., & Johnson, P. (2008). Paperless assignments: Moving forward or marking time?. In Hello! Where are you in the landscape of educational technology? Proceedings ASCILITE Melbourne 2008. Retrieved from http://ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne08/procs/barker.pdf
- Barrow, M., & Grant, B. (2012). The ‘truth’ of academic development: How did it get to be about ‘teaching and learning’? Higher Education Research & Development, 31, 465–477.
- Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). Formative assessment and science education. (pp. 80–94), Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
- Bender, T. (2003). Rethinking learning theory within in the online class. Discussion-based online teaching to enhance students’ learning. (pp. 16–33). Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
- Campbell, N. (2003). So you want to teach online? It won’t happen overnight but it can happen. Computers in New Zealand Schools. 15, 11–13, & 25.
- Chalmers, A. (1998). Workloads and stress in New Zealand universities. Report for the New Zealand Council for Educational Research and the Association of University Staff of New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.
- Cong, Y., & Earl, K. (2011). Chinese postgraduate students learning online in New Zealand. In A. Edmundson (Ed.), Cases on globalized and culturally appropriate e-learning (pp. 73–93). Hersey, PA: IGI Global.
- Costa, A. L., & Kallick, B. (2004). Assessment strategies for self-directed learning. In T. R. Guskey & R. J. Marzano (Series Eds.), Experts in assessment series, book three. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
- Crooks, T. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58, 438–481.
- Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S. 1994. Handbook of qualitative research. England: Sage London.
- Crooks, T. (2006). Some principles for guiding student learning effectively. NZEI Occasional Papers 2006. Wellington, New Zealand: NZEI.
- Donaghy, A., McGee, C., Ussher, B., & Yates, R. (2003). Online teaching and learning: A study of teacher education students’ experiences. Hamilton, New Zealand: The University of Waikato.
- Earl, K. (2012). Short-text assessment formats for an online environment. DEQuarterly, 10, 2–3.
- Giles, D., & Earl, K. (2013, in press). Being ‘in’ assessment: The ontological layer(ing) of assessment practice .Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. 5.
- Gilmore, A., & Smith, J. (2008). Students’ experience of assessment. University of Canterbury and University of Otago. Research article supporting ‘Directions for Assessment in New Zealand’. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
- Hattie, J, & Timperley, H. (2007, March). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research. 77, 81–112.
- Lazarsfeld Jensen, S., & Morgan, K. (2009). The vanishing idea of a scholarly life. Australian Universities Review, 55, 62–69.
- Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2006). Response to assessment feedback: The effects of grades, praise, and source of information. Princeton, NJ: Education Testing Service and University of Otago.
- Mather, K., Worrall, L., & Seifert, R. (2007). Reforming further education: The changing labour process for college lecturers. Personnel Review, 36, 109–127.
- Paewai, S. R., Meyer, L. H., & Houston, D. J. (2007). Problem solving academic workloads management: A university response. Higher Education Quarterly, 61, 375–390.
- Ryan, Y., Tynan, B., Lamont-Mills, A., & Hinton, L. (2012). ‘Out of hours’: The implications of digitized education on workload. DEQuarterly, 10, 9–10.
- Troutner, J. (2006). Best websites for virtual learning. Teacher Librarian, 34, 43–44.
- Tunstall, P., & Gipps, C. (1996). How does your teacher help you make your own work better?” Children’s understanding of formative assessment. Curriculum Journal, 7, 185–203.
- van Manen, M. (2002). The tone of teaching. Ontario, Canada: The Althouse Press.
- Walsham, G. (2006). Doing interpretive research. European Journal of Information Sytems, 15, 320–330.
- Young, S. (2006). Student views of effective online teaching in higher education. American Journal of Distance Education, 20, 65–77.