Effects of feedback on collaborative writing in an online learning environment

References

• Alvarez, I., Espasa, A., & Guasch, T. (2011). The value of feedback in improving collaborative writing assignments in an online learning environment. Studies in Higher Education, 37, 387–400. doi:10.1080/03075079.2010.510182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bangert, A. W. (2004). The seven principles of good practice: A framework for evaluating on-line teaching. The Internet and Higher Education, 7, 217–232. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.06.003
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Berlanga, A., Rosmalen, P., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Sloep, P. (2011). Exploring formative feedback on textual assignments with the help of automatically created visual representations. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28, 146–160. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00425.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M., & Lam, J. (2011). Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36, 395–407. doi:10.1080/03075071003642449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castelló, M., Iñesta, A., & Monereo, C. (2009). Towards self-regulated academic writing: An exploratory study with graduate students in a situated learning environment. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 7, 1107–1130. Retrieved from http://www.investigacion-psicopedagogica.org/revista/new/english/
   Google Scholar
• Cerrato, T., & Rodriguez, H. (2002). Studies of computer supported collaborative writing implications for systems design. In M. Blay-Fornarino, A. Pinna-Dery, K. Schmidt, & P. Zaraté (Eds.), Cooperative systems design (pp. 139–154). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. (2010). Student revision with peer and expert reviewing. Learning and Instruction, 20, 328–338. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dysthe, O. (2007a). How a reform affects writing in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 32, 237–253. doi:10.1080/03075070701267285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dysthe, O. (2007b). Electronic feedback in higher education. Paper presented at the 4th Conference of the European Association for the Teaching of Academic Writing, 30 June–2 July, Ruhr- Universität Bochum, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Dysthe, O., Lillejord, S., Vines, A., & Wasson, B. (2010). Productive e-feedback in higher education – Some critical issues. In. S. Ludvigsen, A. Lund, I. Rasmussen, & R. Säljö (Eds.), Learning across sites: New tools infrastructures and practices (pp. 243–259). Oxford: Pergamon Press
   Google Scholar
• Erkens, G., Jaspers, E., Prangsma, M., & Kanselaar, G. (2005). Coordination processes in computer supported collaborative writing. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 173–190. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erkens, G., Prangsma, M. E., & Jaspers, J. G. M. (2006). Planning and coordinating activities in collaborative learning. In A. M. O’Donnell, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, & G. Erkens (Eds.), Collaborative learning, reasoning, and technology (pp. 233–265). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., Richardson, J. C., Belland, B., Camin, D., Connolly, P., Coulthard, G., Lei, K., & Mong, C. (2007). Using peer feedback to enhance the quality of student online postings: An exploratory study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 78–99. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00331.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N. (1986). Product comparisons and process benefits of collaborative peer group and self assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 11, 146–166. doi:10.1080/0260293860110206
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, D. (1999). Writing as a knowledge-constituting process. In M. Torrance & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Knowing what to write: Conceptual process in text production (pp. 139–160). Amsterdam: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gielen, S., Tops, L., Dochy, F., Onhema, P., & Smeets, S. (2010). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback and of various peer feedback forms in a secondary writing curriculum. British Educational Research Journal, 36, 143–162. doi:10.1080/01411920902894070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harasim, L. (2000). Shift happens: Online education as a new paradigm in learning. The Internet in Higher Education, 3, 41–61. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00032-4
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/bul/119/2/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2010). Peer assessment as collaborative learning: A cognitive perspective. Learning & Instruction, 20, 344–348. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulhavy, R. W., & Stock, W. A. (1989). Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude. Educational Pyschology Review, 1, 279–308. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/journal/10648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lea, M., & Street, B. V. (1998). Student writing and staff feedback in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23, 157–172. doi:10.1080/03075079812331380364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Pihlajamäki, H. (2003). Can a collaborative network environment enhance essay-writing processes? British Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 17–30. doi:10.1111/bjet.2003.34.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonka, K. (2003). Helping doctoral students to finish their theses. In L. Björk, G. Bräuer, L. Rienecker, G. Ruhmann, & P. Stray Jörgensen (Eds.), Teaching academic writing across Europe (pp. 113–131). Dordrecht: Kluwer University Press. doi:10.1007/0-306-48195-2
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, J. (2001). Exploiting online interactivity to enhance assignment development and feedback in distance education. Open Learning, 16, 179–189. doi:10.1080/02680510120050334
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J., & Brunning, R. (2001). Providing feedback in computer-based instruction: What the research tell us. Retrieved from http://dwb.unl.edu/Edit/MB/MasonBruning.html
   Google Scholar
• Miao, Y., Badger, R., & Zhen, Y. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 179–200. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mory, E. H. (2004). Feedback research revisited. In A. D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 745–785). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Narciss, S. (2004). The impact of informative tutoring feedback and self-efficacy on motivation and achievement in concept learning. Experimental Psychology, 51, 214–228. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.51.3.214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narciss, S. (2008). Feedback strategies for interactive learning tasks. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Van Merriënboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed.). (pp. 125–144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Narciss, S., & Huth, K. (2006). Fostering achievement and motivation with bug-related tutoring feedback in a computer-based training for written subtraction. Learning and Instruction, 16, 310–322. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199–218. doi:10.1080/03075070600572090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onrubia, J., & Engel, A. (2009). Strategies for collaborative writing and phases of knowledge construction in CSCL environments. Computers & Education, 53, 1256–1265. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulus, T. M. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 265–289. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80117-9
   Google Scholar
• Phielix, C., Prins, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2010). Awareness of group performance in a CSCL environment: Effects of peer feedback and reflection. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 151–161. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, I., Mitchell, A., & Baecker, R. (1996). Learning to write together using groupware. In R. Rada (Ed.), Computer supported cooperative writing (pp. 161–185). Hillside, NJ: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Price, M., Handley, K., & Millar, J. (2011). Feedback: Focusing attention on engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 36, 879–896. doi:10.1080/03075079.2010.483513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prins, F. J., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Kirschner, P. A., & Strijbos, J. W. (2005). Formative peer assessment in a CSCL Environment: A case study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 417–444. doi:10.1080/02602930500099219
   Google Scholar
• Puntambekar, S., Erkens, G., & Hmelo-Silver, C. (Eds.) (2011). Analyzing interactions in CSCL: Methods, approaches and issues. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A., Kuo, L.-J., Glina, M., & Anderson, R. (2008). Measuring argumentative reasoning: What’s behind the numbers? Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 219–224. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2008.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheuer, O., Loll, F., Pinkwart, N., & McLaren, B. M. (2010). Computer-supported argumentation: A review of the state of the art. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5, 43–102. doi:10.1007/s11412-009-9080-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153–189. doi:10.3102/0034654307313795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2006). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Products, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 153–173. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strijbos, J. W., Narciss, S., & Dunnebier, K. (2010). Peer feedback content and sender’s competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency? Learning and Instruction, 20, 291–303. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K., Smith, E., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. (2000). Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25, 149–169. doi:10.1080/713611428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, S., & Tsai, C. C. (2007). On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course. Computers & Education, 49, 1161–1174. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tynjälä, P., Mason, L., & Lonka, K. (Eds.) (2001). Writing as a learning tool: Integrating theory and practice. Dordrecth: Kluwer Academic Publishers Books.
   Google Scholar
• Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2007). Ten steps to complex learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Boom, G., Paas, F., & Van Merriënboer, J. (2007). Effects of elicited reflections combined with tutor or peer feedback on self-regulated learning and learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 17, 532–548. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Pol, J., Van den Berg, I., Admiraal, W., & Simons, P. R. J. (2008). The nature, reception, and use of online in higher education. Computers & Education, 51, 1804–1817. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo, Y., & Reeves, T. C. (2007). Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: A social constructivist interpretation. The Internet and Higher Education, 10, 15–25. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.10.005
   Google Scholar
• Yarrow, F., & Topping, K. J. (2001). Collaborative writing: The effects of metacognitive prompting and structured peer interaction. British Journal of Educational Technology, 71, 261–282. doi:10.1348/000709901158514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar