Students’ characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning

References

• American Psychology Association. (1997). Learner-centered psychological principles: A framework for school redesign and reform. Wachington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. B. (2000). Virtual classroom versus physical classroom: An exploratory study of class discussion patterns and student learning in an asynchronous Internet-based MBA course. Journal of Management Education, 24, 213–233. doi:10.1177/105256290002400206
   Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. B. (2004). Learning to learn online: A study of perceptual changes between multiple online course experiences. Internet & Higher Education, 7, 169–183. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.06
   Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. B., & Duray, R. (2002). Technological and structural characteristics, student learning and satisfaction with web-based courses – An exploratory study of two on-line MBA programs. Management Learning, 33, 331–347. doi:10.1177/1350507602333003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, D. A. (2011). Students’ perceptions of online learning and instructional tools: A qualitative study of undergraduate students use of online tools. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10, 222–226. Retrieved from http://www.tojet.net/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artino, A. R. (2009). Think, feel, act: Motivational and emotional influences on military students’ online academic success. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21, 146–166. doi:10.1007/s12528-009-9020-9
   Google Scholar
• Artino, A. R., & McCoach, D. B. (2008). Development and initial validation of the online learning value and self-efficacy scale. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38, 279–303. doi:10.1177/1359105312439732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, R., & Khasawneh, S. (2004). A path analytic study of the determinants of college students’ motivation to use online learning technologies. Academy of Human Resource Development International Conference (AHRD)(pp. 1075–1082). Retrieved from ERIC Document Reproduction Service (ED492503).
   Google Scholar
• Bean, J. P., & Bradley, R. K. (1986). Untangling of satisfaction-performance relationship for college students. Journal of Higher Education, 57, 393–412. doi:10.2307/1980994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billings, D.M. (2000). A framework for assessing outcomes and practices in web-based courses in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 39, 60–67. Retrieved from http://www.healio.com/journals/jne
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biner, P. M., Dean, R. S., & Mellinger, A. E. (1994). Factors underlying distance learner satisfaction with televised college-level courses. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8, 60–71. doi:10.1080/08923649409526845
   Google Scholar
• Bourne, J. R. (1998). Net-learning: Strategies for on-campus and off-campus network-enabled learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2, 70–88. Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/jaln_main
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. W., Boyer, M. A., Mayall, H. J., Johnson, P. R., Meng, L., & Butler, M. J. et al. (2003). The Global Ed Project: Gender differences in a problem-based learning environment of international negotiations. Instructional Science, 31, 255–276. doi:10.1023/A:1024677708501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, T. (1995). Gender differences in self-efficacy and attitudes toward computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 147–158. doi:10.2190/H7E1-XMM7-GU9B-3HWR
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, S. H., & Smith, R. A. (2008). Effectiveness of personal interaction in a learner-centered paradigm distance education class based on student satisfaction. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40, 407–426. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/EJ826084.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DeTure, M. (2004). Cognitive style and self-efficacy: Predicting student success in online distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 18, 21–38. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/hajd20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, A., Yankelov, P., & Faul, A. C. (2003). Student perceptions of web-assisted teaching strategies. Journal of Social Work Education, 39, 443–457. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/uswe20#.UfmhmtLntyI
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2003). Educational research: An introduction (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Hox, J. J., & Bechger, T. M. (1998). An introduction to structural equation modeling. Family Science Review, 11, 354–373. Retrieved from http://www.familyscienceassociation.org/familysciencereview
   Google Scholar
• Imhof, M., Vollmeyer, R., & Beierlein, C. (2007). Computer use and the gender gap: The issue of access, use, motivation, and performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2823–2837. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joo, Y., Bong, M., & Choi, H. (2000). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and Internet self-efficacy in web-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48, 5–17. doi:10.1007/BF02313398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplowitz, M. D., Hadlock, T. D., & Levine, R. (2004). A comparison of web and mail survey response rates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68, 94–101. doi:10.1093/poq/nfh006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, Y. (2007). Comparing dropouts and persistence in e-learning courses. Computers & Education, 48, 185–204. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, D. H., Yoon, W., & Morris, M. L. (2006). Instructional and learner factors influencing learning outcomes with online learning environment. Academy of Human Resource Development International Conference (AHRD) (pp. 972–979). Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED492786.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Marks, R. B., Sibley, S. D., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2005). A structural equation model of predictors for effective online learning. Journal of Management Education, 29, 531–563. doi:10.1080/01587910701305319
   Google Scholar
• McLoughlin, C. (2002). Learner support in distance and networked learning environments: Ten dimensions for successful design. Distance Education, 23, 149–162. doi:10.1080/0158791022000009178
   Google Scholar
• McMahon, M., & Oliver, R. (2001). Promoting self-regulated learning in an online environment. Ed-Media 2001 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 1299–1305). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
   Google Scholar
• Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2006). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miltiadou, M., & Yu, C. H. (2000). Validation of the online technologies self-efficacy scale (OTSES). (Publication No. ED 445 672). Retrieved from http://www.www.creative-wisdom.com/pub/efficacy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Paechter, M., Maier, M., & Macher, D. (2010). Students’ expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction. Computers & Education, 54, 222–229. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsad, B., Lewis, L., & Tice, P. (2008). Distance education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions: 2006–07. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statisitics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2009/2009044.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (1995). Understanding self-regulated learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 63, 3–12. doi:10.1002/tl.37219956304
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459–470. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00015-4
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385–407. doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivation Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–813. Retrieved from http://epm.sagepub.com/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2002). The development of academic self-regulation: The role of cognitive and motivational factors. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccle (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 249–284). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Puzziferro, M. (2008). Online technologies self-efficacy and self-regulated learning as predictors of final grade and satisfaction in college-level online courses. The American Journal of Distance Education, 22, 72–89. doi:10.1080/08923640802039024
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, D. W., & Morrison-Shetlar, A. I. (2001). Student attitudes toward web-enhanced instruction in an Introductory biology course. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33, 251–262. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/94597
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, C. A., & Anderson, M. L. (1994). Distance education: Review of the literature. Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2002). The development of academic self-efficacy. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccle (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 15–31). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2006). Competence and control beliefs: Distinguishing the means and ends. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed.). (pp. 349–367). Washington, DC: American Psychology Association.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Thurmond, V. A. , Wambach, K., Connors, H. R., & Frey, B. B. (2002). Evaluation of student satisfaction: Determining the impact of a Web-based environment by controlling for student characteristics. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16, 169–189. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/hajd20
   Google Scholar
• Ullman, J. B., & Bentler, P. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling. In I. B. Winner (Ed.), Handbook of psychology (2nd ed., pp. 661–690). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Waits, T., Lewis, L., & Greene, B. (2003). Distance education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions: 2000–2001. Washington, DC: US Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2003/2003017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wang, A. Y., & Newlin, M. H. (2002). Predictors of web-student performance: The role of self-efficacy and reasons for taking an on-line class. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 151–163. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/07475632/18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whipp, J. L., & Chiarelli, S. (2004). Self-regulation in a web-based course: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52, 5–22. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/journal/11423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijekumar, K., Ferguson, L., & Wagoner, D. (2006). Problem with assessment validity and reliability in web-based distance learning environments and solutions. Journal of Educational Multimedia & Hypermedia, 15, 199–215. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/6259?nl
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y. (2006). Effects of embedded strategies on promoting the use of self-regulation learning strategies in an online learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 34, 257–269. Retrieved from http://baywood.metapress.com/app/home/contribution.asp?referrer=parent&backto=issue,2,7;journal,29,162;linkingpublicationresults,1:300322,1
   Google Scholar
• Yukselturk, E. (2009). Do entry characteristics of online learners affect their satisfaction?International Journal on E-Learning, 8, 263–281. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/25266
   Google Scholar
• Yukselturk, E., & Bulut, S.(2007). Predictors for student success in an online course. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 71–83. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yukselturk, E., & Bulut, S. (2009). Gender differences in self-regulated online learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 12–22. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar