Transgenic learning for STEAM subjects and virtual containers for OER

References

• Albright, P. (2005). Open educational resources open content for higher education. In Internet discussions forums.
   Google Scholar
• Angiuoli, S. V., Matalka, M., Gussman, A., Galens, K., Vangala, M., Riley, D. R., … Fricke, W. F. (2011). CloVR: A virtual machine for automated and portable sequence analysis from the desktop using cloud computing. BMC Bioinformatics, 12, 356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apolinario, R. M. (2015). Genetically Modified Organisms.
   Google Scholar
• Barham, P., Dragovic, B., Fraser, K., Hand, S., Harris, T., Ho, A., … Warfield, A. (2003). Xen and the art of virtualization. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 12(1), 356.
   Google Scholar
• Bližňák, M., Vojtěšek, J., Matušů, R., & Dulík, T. (2008). Virtualization as a teaching tool. Distance Learning, Multimedia and Video Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Boettiger, C. (2015). An introduction to Docker for reproducible research. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 49(1), 71–79.
   Google Scholar
• Bolte, M., Sievers, M., Birkenheuer, G., Niehörster, O., & Brinkmann, A. (2010). Non-intrusive virtualization management using libvirt. In Proceedings of the Conference on Design, Automation and Test in Europe (pp. 575–579), Dresden, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, J. (2010). Desktop virtualization in K-12 schools. Technical report, Center for Digital Education.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, M., Rigby, D., Young, T., & James, S. (2001). Consumer attitudes to genetically modified organisms in food in the UK. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 28(4), 479–498.10.1093/erae/28.4.479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Che, J., Yu, Y., Shi, C., & Lin, W. (2010). A synthetical performance evaluation of OpenVZ, Xen and KVM. In Services Computing Conference (APSCC), 2010 IEEE Asia-Pacific.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B., Deshane, T., Dow, E. M., Evanchik, S., Finlayson, M., Herne, J., & Matthews, J. N. (2004). Xen and the art of repeated research. In USENIX Annual Technical Conference, Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2010). The second educational revolution: Rethinking education in the age of technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 18–27.10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00339.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin, K., Pauli, W., & Ham, M. (2013). Creating a virtualized environment for large-scale hands-on IA education. Proceedings of the Information Systems Educators Conference, vol. 30, paper number 2522, Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3–8.10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlö, M., Haziza, F., Kallio, A., Korpelainen, E., Bongcam-Rudloff, E., & Spjuth, O. (2015). Bioimg.org: A catalog of virtual machine images for the life sciences. Bioinformatics and Biology Insights, 9, 125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De-la-Fuente-Valentín, L., Carrasco, A., Konya, K., & Burgos, D. (2013). Emerging technologies landscape on education: A review. IJIMAI, 2(3), 55.
   Google Scholar
• Deshane, T., Shepherd, Z., Matthews, J., Ben-Yehuda, M., Shah, A., & Rao, B. (2008). Quantitative comparison of Xen and KVM. Boston, MA: Xen Summit.
   Google Scholar
• Fragni, C., Moreira, M. D., Mattos, D. M., Costa, L. H. M., & Duarte, O. C. M. (2010). Evaluating Xen, VMware, and OpenVZ virtualization platforms for network virtualization. Universidade Federal Rio de Janeiro.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, A., Fay, J., Muench, A., Pepe, A., Udomprasert, P., & Wong, C. (2012). Worldwide telescope in research and education. arXiv preprint arXiv:1201.1285.
   Google Scholar
• Hagstrom, A., & Essary, B. (2009). US Patent 7,631,006. Managing team software projects using virtual containers.
   Google Scholar
• Hamada, T. (2009). Knoppix/math: A live system for enjoying mathematics with computer. ACM Communications in Computer Algebra, 42(3), 175–176.
   Google Scholar
• Hatzipanagos, S., & Gregson, J. (2015). The role of open access and open educational resources: A distance learning perspective. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 13(2), 97–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM (2007). Virtualization in education. Technical report. IBM Global Education.
   Google Scholar
• Joy, A. M. (2015). Performance comparison between Linux containers and virtual machines. In International Conference on Advances in Computer Engineering and Applications (pp. 342–346), New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Kind, T., Leamy, T., Leary, J. A., & Fiehn, O. (2009). Software platform virtualization in chemistry research and university teaching. Journal of Cheminformatics, 1(1), 18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivity, A., Kamay, Y., Laor, D., Lublin, U., & Liguori, A. (2007). KVM: The Linux virtual machine monitor. In Proceedings of the Linux symposium (Vol. 1, pp. 225–230), Ottawa, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Kolyshkin, K. (2006). Virtualization in Linux. White paper, OpenVZ.
   Google Scholar
• Li, P. (2009). Exploring virtual environments in a decentralized lab. SIGITERes. IT., 6(1), 4–10.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, D., & Zhao, L. (2014). The research and implementation of cloud computing platform based on Docker. In 11th International Computer Conference on Wavelet Active Media Technology and Information Processing, Chengdu, China.
   Google Scholar
• McGreal, R., Kinuthia, W., Marshall, S., & McNamara, T. (2013). Open educational resources: Innovation, research and practice. Vancouver: Commonwealth of Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Millis, N. (2006). Genetically modified organisms. Paper prepared for the 2006 Australian State of the Environment Committee, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, A., & Wilson, S. (2005). Virtualization with VMware ESX Server. Elsevier. ISBN: 978-1-59749-019-1.
   Google Scholar
• Nauczycielski, W. (2011). Desktop virtualization as a modern solution in education. In Ročník Národnej Konferencie, Banská Bystrica.
   Google Scholar
• Nerantzi, C. (2012). A case of problem-based learning for cross-institutional collaboration. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 10(3), 306–314.
   Google Scholar
• New Media Consortium, & EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative. (2015). The NMC Horizon Report: 2015 Higher Education Edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• OCCI-WG. (2010). Open cloud computing interface-infrastructure models. Technical report, Open Grid Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, N., Weller, M., Scanlon, E., & Kinsley, S. (2012). Digital scholarship considered: How new technologies could transform academic work. Education, 16(1).
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernández, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., … Silverman, B. (2009). Scratch: Programming for all. Communications of the ACM, 52(11), 60–67.10.1145/1592761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, R. (2014). Linux containers and the future cloud. Linux Journal, 240(4), 86–95.
   Google Scholar
• Seo, K. T., Hwang, H., Moon, I., Kwon, O., & Kim, B. (2014). Performance comparison analysis of Linux container and virtual machine for building cloud. Advanced Science and Technology Letters, 66, 105–111.
   Google Scholar
• Sultan, N. (2010). Cloud computing for education: A new dawn? International Journal of Information Management, 30(2), 109–116.10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toderick, L., Peng, L., & Lunsford, P.. (2009). Experiencing virtual computing lab in information technology education. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on SIG-information technology education (pp. 55–59), Fairfax.
   Google Scholar
• Tuomas, V. (2015). Advantages of Docker ( PhD thesis). University of Jyväskylä.
   Google Scholar
• Wrigley, T. (2009). Rethinking education in the era of globalization. Contesting Neoliberal Education: Public Resistance and Collective Advance, 61–82
   Google Scholar
• Zancanaro, A., Todesco, J. L., & Ramos, F. (2015). A bibliometric mapping of open educational resources. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar