References
- Accessibility Works. (2017, November 15). 2017 web accessibility ADA lawsuit statistics show the surge accelerating. https://www.accessibility.works/blog/2017-web-accessibility-ada-lawsuit-statistics-2017/
- American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000
- Babbie, E. R. (2013). The practice of social research (13th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
- Baldwin, S., Ching, Y. H., & Hsu, Y. C. (2018). Online course design in higher education: A review of national and statewide evaluation instruments. TechTrends, 62, 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0215-z
- Baldwin, S. J., & Ching, Y.-H. (2019). An online course design checklist: Development and users’ perceptions. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 31, 156–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9199-8
- Bogart, K. R., & Dunn, D. S. (2019). Ableism special issue introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 75(3), 650–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12354
- Bowersox, E. (2019, March 1). Municipalities and universities new targets in ADA website accessibility lawsuits. McAfee & Taft EmployerLINC. https://www.mcafeetaft.com/municipalities-and-universities-new-targets-in-ada-website-accessibility-lawsuits/
- Burke, D. D., Clapper, D., & McRae, D. (2016). Accessible online instruction for students with disabilities: Federal imperatives and the challenge of compliance. Journal of Law & Education, 44(2), 135–181.
- Campbell, T., & Wescott, J. (2019). Web tables: Profile of undergraduate students: Attendance, distance and remedial education, degree program and field of study, demographics, financial aid, financial literacy, employment, and military status: 2015–16. U.S. Department of Education National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2019/2019467.pdf
- Carlsen, A., Holmberg, C., Neghina, C., & Owusu-Boampong, A. (2016). Closing the gap: Opportunities for distance education to benefit adult learners in higher education. UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning. k https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000243264
- Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). Routledge.
- Coleman, M., & Berge, Z. L. (2018). A review of accessibility in online higher education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 21(1), 1–8. http://www.westga.edu/∼distance/ojdla/spring211/coleman_berge211.html
- Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed). SAGE Publications.
- Crossland, A., Gray, T., Reynolds, J., Wellington, D., & Zhou, A. ((2016, October). Digital accessibility toolkit: What education leaders need to know. American Institutes for Research, Center on Technology and Disability.
- Cullipher, V. (2017). (2017, November 13). Schools and organizations that serve education: Beware OCR complaints addressing online accessibility. Medley’s Cyber Tech & E-Commerce. https://www.lexislegalnews.com/articles/21999/commentary-schools-and-organizations-that-serve-education-beware-ocr-complaints-addressing-online-accessibility
- Curl, A. L., & Bowers, D. D. (2009). A longitudinal study of website accessibility: Have social work education websites become more accessible? Journal of Technology in Human Services, 27(2), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228830902749229
- deMaine, S. D. (2014). From disability to usability in online instruction. Law Library Journal, 106(4), 531–560. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/2871
- Fennelly-Atkinson, R. (in press). Ableism versus inclusion: A systems view of accessibility practices in online higher education. In B. Hokanson, M. Exter, M. Schmidt, & A. Tawfik (Eds.), Toward inclusive learning design: Social justice, equity, and community. Springer-Verlag.
- Ferri, D., & Favalli, S. (2018). Web accessibility for people with disabilities in the European Union: Paving the road to social inclusion. Societies, 8(2), 40–58. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc8020040
- Foley, A. (2011). Exploring the design, development and use of websites through accessibility and usability studies. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 20(4), 361–385. http://www.editlib.org/p/37621/
- Goggin, G., Ellis, K., & Hawkins, W. (2019). Disability at the centre of digital inclusion: Assessing a new moment in technology and rights. Communication Research and Practice, 5(3), 290–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2019.1641061
- Golden, N. (2008). Access this: Why institutions of higher education must provide access to the internet to students with disabilities. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law, 10(2), 363–411. https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/jetlaw/vol10/iss2/3
- Hackett, S., & Parmanto, B. (2005). A longitudinal evaluation of accessibility: Higher education web sites. Internet Research, 15(3), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240510602690
- Hamraie, A. (2018). Mapping access: Digital humanities, disability justice, and sociospatial practice. American Quarterly, 70(3), 455–482. https://doi.org/10.1353/aq.2018.0031
- Hill, P. (2018, January 22). Preliminary data on K-12 LMS market. eLiterate. https://eliterate.us/preliminary-data-k-12-lms-market/
- Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research. (2017). Size & setting classification description. http://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/classification_descriptions/size_setting.php
- Johns, S., & Wolking, M. (2016). The core four of personalized learning: The elements you need to succeed. Education Elements. https://www.edelements.com/hubfs/Core_Four/Education_Elements_Core_Four_White_Paper.pdf
- Kuykendall, H. (2017, February 22). Section 508 and WCAG: How updated federal accessibility standards map to WCAG 2.0. Microassist Digital Accessibility Digest. https://www.microassist.com/digital-accessibility/section-508-and-wcag/
- Laufer Nir, H., & Rimmerman, A. (2018). Evaluation of web content accessibility in an Israeli institution of higher education. Universal Access in the Information Society, 17(3), 663–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10209-018-0615-7/TABLES/5
- Launey, K. M., & Aristizabal, M. (2017, August 22). Website accessibility lawsuit filings still going strong. ADA Title III: News & Insights. https://www.adatitleiii.com/2017/08/website-accessibility-lawsuit-filings-still-going-strong/
- Lowenthal, P. R., Lomellini, A., Smith, C., & Greear, K. (2021). Accessible online learning: A critical analysis of online quality assurance frameworks. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 22(2), 15–29.
- Madaus, J. W. (2011). The history of disability services in higher education. New Directions for Higher Education, 154, 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.429
- Magnus, E., & Tøssebro, J. (2014). Negotiating individual accommodation in higher education. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 16(4), 316–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/15017419.2012.761156
- Mancilla, R., & Frey, B. (2021, May 20). Professional development for digital accessibility: A needs assessment. Quality Matters. https://www.qualitymatters.org/sites/default/files/research-docs-pdfs/QM-Digital-Accessibility-Professional-Development-WP.pdf
- Miller, M. D. (2021, March 17). A year of remote teaching: The good, the bad, and the next steps. The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/a-year-of-remote-teaching-the-good-the-bad-and-the-next-steps
- Myers, E. L. (2004). Disability and technology. Montana Law Review, 65(2), 1–20. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/mlr/vol65/iss2/3
- National Association of the Deaf. (2020, February 18). Landmark agreements establish new model for online accessibility in higher education and business [Press release]. https://www.nad.org/2020/02/18/landmark-agreements-establish-new-model-for-online-accessibility-in-higher-education-and-business/
- National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). High school transcript study: How is grade point average calculated? https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/hsts/howgpa.aspx
- National Center on Universal Design for Learning & Center for Applied Special Technology. (2014). The three principles of UDL. http://www.udlcenter.org/aboutudl/whatisudl/3principles
- Nieves, L. H., Moya, E. C., & Soldado, R. M. (2019). A MOOC on universal design for learning designed based on the UDL paradigm. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(6), 30–47. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5532
- Office for Civil Rights. (2018). Protecting students with disabilities. https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/504faq.html#introduction
- Pace, D., & Schwartz, D. (2008, December). Accessibility in post secondary education: Application of UDL to college curriculum. US-China Education Review, 5(12), 20–26. https://www.davidpublisher.com/Public/uploads/Contribute/55b719eb35778.pdf
- Pacific ADA Center. (n.d.). Accessibility testing. AccessibleTech.Org. Retrieved August 28, 2022, from https://accessibletech.org/testing/
- Pan, J. (2017, September 26). (2017, September 26). 508, ADA, WCAG: What’s the difference? Logic Solutions. https://www.logicsolutions.com/508-ada-wcag-accessibility-difference/
- Parry, M. ((2010, November 11). ADA compliance is a ‘major vulnerability’ for online programs. The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/ada-compliance-a-major-vulnerability-for-online-programs/28136
- Persson, H., Åhman, H., Yngling, A. A., & Gulliksen, J. (2015). Universal design, inclusive design, accessible design, design for all: Different concepts—one goal? On the concept of accessibility—historical, methodological and philosophical aspects. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(4), 505–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0358-z
- Ravallion, M. (2012). Mashup indices of development. The World Bank Research Observer, 27(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkr009
- Roig-Vila, R., Ferrández, S., & Ferri-Miralles, I. (2014). Assessment of web content accessibility levels in Spanish official online education environments. International Education Studies, 7(6), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n6p31
- Rowland, C. (2017, March 10). UC Berkeley decision results in universal inaccessibility. WebAIM. https://webaim.org/blog/uc-berkeley-inaccessibility
- Rowland, C., Goetze, L., & Whiting, J. (2014). GOALS cost case study: Costs of web accessibility in higher education. National Center on Disability and Access to Education. http://www.ncdae.org/documents/GOALS_Cost_Case_Study.pdf
- Scott, S., & Aquino, K. (2020). COVID-19 transitions: Higher education professionals’ perspectives on access barriers, services, and solutions for students with disabilities. Association on Higher Education and Disability. https://higherlogicdownload.s3.amazonaws.com/AHEAD/38b602f4-ec53-451c-9be0-5c0bf5d27c0a/UploadedImages/COVID-19_/AHEAD_COVID_Survey_Report_Barriers_and_Resource_Needs.pdf
- Scott, S., & Aquino, K. (2021). COVID-19 transitions: An update on access, barriers, and supports nine months into the pandemic. Association on Higher Education and Disability. https://higherlogicdownload.s3.amazonaws.com/AHEAD/38b602f4-ec53-451c-9be0-5c0bf5d27c0a/UploadedImages/COVID-19_/AHEAD_COVID_Report_wave_2_final.pdf
- Seaman, J. E., Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2018). Grade increase: Tracking distance education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group. http://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/gradeincrease.pdf
- Shawar, B. A. (2015). Evaluating web accessibility of educational websites. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 10(4), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v10i4.4518
- Stats Tutor. (n.d.). Spearman’s correlation. Retrieved July 17, 2022, from https://www.statstutor.ac.uk/topics/correlation/spearmans-correlation-coefficient/
- U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, & National Center for Education Statistics. (2017). Table 303.20. Total fall enrollment in all postsecondary institutions participating in Title IV programs and annual percentage change in enrollment, by degree-granting status and control of institution: 1995 through 2016 [Digest of Education Statistics 20]. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d17/tables/dt17_303.20.asp?current=yes
- U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division. (2009). A guide to disability rights laws. https://www.ada.gov/cguide.htm
- U.S. General Services Administration. (2017, November 10). Accessibility news: The Section 508 update. https://www.section508.gov/blog/accessibility-news-the-section-508-Update
- U.S. General Services Administration. (2018, May). Design & develop: Applicability & conformance. https://www.section508.gov/develop/applicability-conformance/
- U.S. News & World Report. (2019). Best online bachelor’s programs. https://www.usnews.com/education/online-education/bachelors/rankings
- UsableNet. (2019). 2018 ADA web accessibility recap: Lawsuit report. https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/3280432/2019_UsableNet_WebAccessibilityLawsuit_Infographic_FINAL.pdf
- UsableNet. (2020). 2020 midyear ADA website and app accessibility report. https://f.hubspotusercontent30.net/hubfs/3280432/2020_Mid-Year_Accessibility_Lawsuit_Report_final_July1.pdf
- Vu, M. N., Launey, K. M., & Ryan, S. (2019, January 31). Number of federal website accessibility lawsuits nearly triple, exceeding 2250 in 2018. ADA Title III: News & Insights. https://www.adatitleiii.com/2019/01/number-of-federal-website-accessibility-lawsuits-nearly-triple-exceeding-2250-in-2018/
- Vu, M. N., Launey, K., & Ryan, S. (2020, September 2). Federal ADA Title III lawsuit numbers drop 15% for the first half of 2020 but a strong rebound is likely. ADA Title III. https://www.adatitleiii.com/2020/09/federal-ada-title-iii-lawsuit-numbers-drop-15-for-the-first-half-of-2020-but-a-strong-rebound-is-likely/
- Web Accessibility in Mind. (2018). WCAG 2.0 checklist. https://webaim.org/standards/wcag/WCAG2Checklist.pdf
- Weissman, S. (2020, September 8). Universities face digital accessibility lawsuits as pandemic continues. Diverse Issues in Higher Education. https://diverseeducation.com/article/189682/
- WICHE Cooperative for Educational Telecommunications, & The Campus Computing Project. (2010). 2010 managing online education survey. https://www.campuscomputing.net/content/2010/11/13/2010-managing-online-education-survey
- World Wide Web Consortium. (2016, January 5). How to meet WCAG 2.0: A customizable quick reference to Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 requirements (success criteria) and techniques. https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/quickref/20160105/
- World Wide Web Consortium. (2018, June 5). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21
- World Wide Web Consortium. (2019, October 4). How to meet WCAG (Quickref reference): A customizable quick reference to Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2 requirements (success criteria) and techniques. https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/quickref
- World Wide Web Consortium Web Accessibility Initiative. (2017, December 23). Selecting web accessibility evaluation tools. https://www.w3.org/WAI/test-evaluate/tools/selecting/#cannot
- Yang, Y. T., & Chen, B. (2015). Web accessibility for older adults: A comparative analysis of disability laws. The Gerontologist, 55(5), 854–864. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnv057
- Yesilada, Y., Brajnik, G., Vigo, M., & Harper, S. (2015). Exploring perceptions of web accessibility: A survey approach. Behaviour & Information Technology, 34(2), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2013.848238