Higher education leaders’ perspectives of accessible and inclusive online learning

References

• American Council on Education. (2022). The Carnegie classification of institutions of higher education: Size & setting classification description. https://carnegieclassifications.acenet.edu/classification_descriptions/size_setting.php
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, G. (2020, April 6). Accessibility suffers during pandemic. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2020/04/06/remote-learning-shift-leaves-students-disabilities-behind
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, E. E., & Forber-Pratt, A. J. (2022). Disability culture, identity, and language. In M. L. Wehmeyer, & D. S. Dunn (Eds.), The positive psychology of personal factors: Implications for understanding disability (pp. 27–40). Lexington Books. https://lccn.loc.gov/2021044033
   Google Scholar
• Bartz, J. (2020). All inclusive?! Empirical insights into individual experiences of students with disabilities and mental disorders at German universities and implications for inclusive higher education. Education Sciences, 10(9), Article 10090223. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, R. D., Weinberg, L. A., & Brodwin, M. G. (2015). Universal Design for Learning and instruction: Perspectives of students with disabilities in higher education. Exceptionality Education International, 25(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.5206/eei.v25i2.7723
   Google Scholar
• Burgstahler, S. (2015). Opening doors or slamming them shut? Online learning practices and students with disabilities. Social Inclusion, 3(6), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v3i6.420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgstahler, S. (2022). Leveling the playing field for students with disabilities in online opportunities. In M. Bonous-Hammarth (Ed.), Bridging marginality through inclusive higher education. neighborhoods, communities, and urban marginality (pp. 235–250). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8000-7_11
   Google Scholar
• Chenail, R. J. (2012). Conducting qualitative data analysis: Reading line-by-line, but analyzing by meaningful qualitative units. The Qualitative Report, 17(1), 266–269. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol17/iss1/12/
   Google Scholar
• Cook, L., Rumrill, P. D., & Tankersley, M. (2009). Priorities and understanding of faculty members regarding college students with disabilities. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21(1), 84–96. https://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/pdf/ijtlhe567.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Dallas, B. K., Upton, T. D., & Sprong, M. E. (2014). Post-secondary faculty attitudes toward inclusive teaching strategies. Journal of Rehabilitation, 80(2), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2015.2.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Los Santos, S. B., Kupcznski, L., & Mundy, M.-A. (2019). Determining academic success in students with disabilities in higher education. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(2), 16–38. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v8n2p16
   Google Scholar
• Dolmage, J. T. (2017). Academic ableism: Disability and higher education. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.9708722
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, D. S., & Andrews, E. E. (2015). Person-first and identity-first language: Developing psychologists’ cultural competence using disability language. American Psychologist, 70(3), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038636
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, V. (2018). Thinking about the coding process in qualitative data analysis. The Qualitative Report, 23(11), 2850–2861. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol23/iss11/14/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenneberg, L. (2022). Student affairs-academic affairs collaborations to support diverse communities. In M. Bonous-Hammarth (Ed.), Bridging marginality through inclusive higher education (pp. 19–41). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8000-7_2
   Google Scholar
• Fichten, C. S., Ferraro, V., Asuncion, J. V., Chwojka, C., Barile, M., Nguyen, M. N., Klomp, R., & Wolforth, J. (2009). Disabilities and e-learning problems and solutions: An exploratory study. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 241–256. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bpOvlrQLZ2D7TRQQqADi-EQ4QZNcfMdj/view
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornauf, B. S., & Erickson, J. D. (2020). Toward an inclusive pedagogy through universal design for learning in higher education: A review of the literature. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 33(2), 188–199. https://higherlogicdownload.s3.amazonaws.com/AHEAD/38b602f4-ec53-451c-9be0-5c0bf5d27c0a/UploadedImages/JPED/JPED_Vol_33/33_issue_2/JPED_33_2_.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, F. J., & Cosenza, C. (2009). Design and evaluation of survey questions. In L. Bickman, & D. J. Rog (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of applied social research methods (pp. 375–412). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483348858.n12
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, R., Simunich, B., Legon, R., & Fredericksen, E. E.(2021). CHLOE 6: Online learning leaders adapt for a post-pandemic world. Quality Matters & Encoura. https://www.qualitymatters.org//sites/default/files/research-docs-pdfs/QM-Eduventures-CHLOE-6-Report-2021.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gladhart, M. A. (2009). Determining faculty needs for delivering accessible electronically delivered instruction in higher education. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 22(3), 185–196. https://higherlogicdownload.s3.amazonaws.com/AHEAD/38b602f4-ec53-451c-9be0-5c0bf5d27c0a/UploadedImages/JPED_ARCHIVE/22/jped_22_3_export__1_.doc
   Google Scholar
• Ginsberg, S. M., & Schulte, K. (2012). Instructional accommodations: Impact of conventional vs. social constructivist view of disability. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8(2), 84–91. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/1702
   Google Scholar
• Harris, P. S., Gould, R., & Mullin, C. (2019). ADA research brief: Higher education and the ADA. ADA National Network Knowledge Translation Center. https://adata.org/sites/adata.org/files/files/ADA%20Research%20Brief_Higher%20Education%20and%20the%20ADA_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Henry, S. L., Abou-Zahra, S., & Brewer, J. (2014). The role of accessibility in a universal web. In Proceedings of the 11th Web for All Conference (pp. 1–4). Association for Computer Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2596695.2596719
   Google Scholar
• Izzo, M. V., Murray, A., & Novak, J. (2008). The faculty perspective on universal design for learning. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 21(2), 60–72. https://higherlogicdownload.s3.amazonaws.com/AHEAD/38b602f4-ec53-451c-9be0-5c0bf5d27c0a/UploadedImages/JPED_ARCHIVE/21/JPED_21_2_Text__2_.doc
   Google Scholar
• Kent, M. (2016). Access and barriers to online education for people with disabilities. National Center for Student Equity in Higher Education. https://www.ncsehe.edu.au/publications/access-and-barriers-to-online-education-for-people-with-disabilities/
   Google Scholar
• Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., & Johnstone, C. (2006). Accommodations and universal design: Supporting access to assessments in higher education. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 19(2), 163–172. https://higherlogicdownload.s3.amazonaws.com/AHEAD/38b602f4-ec53-451c-9be0-5c0bf5d27c0a/UploadedImages/JPED_ARCHIVE/19-2/JPEDVol19No2.doc
   Google Scholar
• Levicky-Townley, C., Garabedian Stork, M., Zhang, J., & Weatherford, E. (2021). Exploring the impact of Universal Design for Learning supports in an online higher education course. Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.51869/101/clt
   Google Scholar
• Linder, K. E., Fontaine-Rainen, D. L., & Behling, K. (2015). Whose job is it? Key challenges and future directions for online accessibility in US institutions of higher education. Open Learning, 30(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2015.1007859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardi, A., Murray, C., & Gerdes, H. (2011). College faculty and inclusive instruction: Self-reported attitudes and actions pertaining to universal design. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 4(4), 250–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomellini, A., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2022). Inclusive online courses: Universal design for learning strategies for faculty buy-in. In J. E. Stefaniak & R. Reese (Eds.), The instructional designer's training guide: Authentic practices and considerations for mentoring ID and ed tech professionals (pp. 101–111). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenthal, P. R., & Lomellini, A. (2022). Creating accessible online learning: A preliminary investigation of educational technologists' and faculty's knowledge and skills. Tech Trends. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00790-1
   Google Scholar
• Lowenthal, P. R., Lomellini, A., Smith, C., & Greer, K. (2021). Accessible online learning: A critical analysis of online quality assurance frameworks. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 22(2), 15–29.
   Google Scholar
• Mancilla, R., & Frey, B. (2020). A model for developing instructional design professionals for higher education through apprenticeship. The Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.51869/92rmbf
   Google Scholar
• McAndrew, P., Farrow, R., & Cooper, M. (2012). Adapting online learning resources for all: Planning for professionalism in accessibility. Research in Learning Technology, 20(4), 345–361. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0.18699
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. CAST.
   Google Scholar
• Microsoft. (2016). Inclusive 101. https://www.microsoft.com/design/inclusive/
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Mirick, R. G., & Wladkowski, S. P. (2019). Skype in qualitative interviews: Participant and researcher perspectives. Qualitative Report, 24(12), 3061–3072. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, K. K., Frechette, C., Dukes, L. III, Stowell, N., Topping, N. E., & Brodosi, D. (2016). Closed captioning matters: Examining the value of closed captions for “all” students. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 29(3), 231–238. http://www.ahead-archive.org/uploads/publications/JPED/jped_29_3/JPED%2029_3_Final%20Doc.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nieminen, J. H., & Pesonen, H. V. (2020). Taking universal design back to its roots: Perspectives on accessibility and identity in undergraduate mathematics. Education Sciences, 10(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10010012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyarzun, B., Bottoms, B. L., & Westine, C. (2021). Adopting and applying the Universal Design for Learning principles in online courses. Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.51869/jaid2021105
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, K. (2021). Inclusive instructional design: Applying UDL to online learning. The Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.51869/jaid2021104
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, K. D., Park, H. J., Brown, S., & Cook, B. (2011). Universal Design for Instruction in postsecondary education: A systematic review of empirically based articles. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 24(1), 5–15. http://www.ahead-archive.org/uploads/publications/JPED/jped_24_1/JPED%2024_1%20FINAL%20DOCUMENT.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sarrett, J. C. (2017). Autism and accommodations in higher education: Insights from the Autism community. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48, 679–693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3353-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satterfield, D., Lepage, C., & Ladjahasan, N. (2015). Preferences for online course delivery methods in higher education for students with autism spectrum disorders. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 3651–3656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.758
   Google Scholar
• Schelly, C. L., Davies, P. L., Spooner, C. L. (2011). Student perceptions of faculty implementation of Universal Design for Learning. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 24(1), 17–30. http://www.ahead-archive.org/uploads/publications/JPED/jped_24_1/JPED%2024_1%20FINAL%20DOCUMENT.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Seale, J. (Ed.). (2020). Improving accessible digital practices in higher education: Challenges and new practices for inclusion. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37125-8
   Google Scholar
• Seale, J., Burgstahler, S., & Havel, A. (2020). One model to rule them all, one model to bind them? A critique of the use of accessibility-related models in post-secondary education. Open Learning, 37(1), 6–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2020.1727320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singleton, K., Evmenova, A., Jerome, M. K., & Clark, K. (2019). Integrating UDL strategies into the online course development process. Online Learning, 23(1), 206–235. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i1.1407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobin, T. J. & Behling, K.T. (2018). Reach everyone, teach everyone: Universal design for learning in higher education. West Virginia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vivanti, G. (2019). Most appropriate way to talk about individuals with a diagnosis of autism? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 50, 691–693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-04280-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W3C Web Accessibility Initiative. (2022). Accessibility, usability, and inclusion. https://www.w3.org/WAI/fundamentals/accessibility-usability-inclusion/
   Google Scholar
• West, E. A., Novak, D., & Mueller, C. (2016). Inclusive instructional practices used and their perceived importance by instructors. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 29(4), 363–374. http://www.ahead-archive.org/uploads/publications/JPED/jped_29_4/JPED29_4_FullDocument.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westine, C. D., Oyarzun, B., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Casto, A., Okraski, C., Park, G., Person, J., & Steele, L. (2019). Familiarity, current use, and interest in Universal Design for Learning among online university instructors. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(5), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.4258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2011). World report on disability. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241564182
   Google Scholar
• Wynants, S. A, & Dennis, J. M. (2017). Embracing diversity and accessibility: A mixed methods study of the impact of an online disability. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 30(1), 33–48. https://higherlogicdownload.s3.amazonaws.com/AHEAD/38b602f4-ec53-451c-9be0-5c0bf5d27c0a/UploadedImages/JPED/JPED_30_1__Full_Doc.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, J., & Rice, M. F. (2021). Professional and social investment in universal design for learning in higher education: Insights from a faculty development programme. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(7), 886–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2020.1827372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, J., Gulinna, A., & Rice, M. F. (2021). Instructional designers’ roles in emergency remote teaching during COVID-19. Distance Education, 42(1), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1869526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, J., Gulinna, A., Rice, M. F., & Griswold, D. E. (2021). Instructional designers’ shifting thinking about supporting teaching during and post-COVID-19. Distance Education, 42(3), 331–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2021.1956305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar