306
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Making the invisible, visible: disability in South African distance education

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 489-507 | Received 21 Jul 2022, Accepted 06 Oct 2022, Published online: 14 Nov 2022

References

  • Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
  • Chiwandire, D., & Vincent, L. (2019), Funding and inclusion in higher education institutions for students with disabilities. African Journal of Disability, 8, Article 336. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v8i0.336
  • Cooper, S., Cant, R., Kelly, M., Levett-Jones, T., McKenna, L., Seaton, P., & Bogossian, F. (2021). An evidence-based checklist for improving scoping review quality. Clinical Nursing Research, 30(3), 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1054773819846024
  • Daniel, J. (2019). Open universities: Old concepts and contemporary challenges. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(4), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i3.4035
  • Daniel, J., Kanwar, A., & Uvalić-Trumbić, S. (2009). Breaking higher education's iron triangle: Access, cost, and quality. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 41(2), 30–35. https://doi.org/10.3200/CHNG.41.2.30-35
  • Farnes, N. (1993). Modes of production: Fordism and distance education. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 8(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268051930080103
  • Goodley, D. (2013). Dis/entangling critical disability studies. Disability & Society, 28(5), 631–644. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.717884
  • Grech, S., & Soldatic, K. (2015). Disability and colonialism: (Dis)encounters and anxious intersectionalities. Social Identities, 21(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2014.995394
  • Hsieh, H., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
  • Kanuka, H., & Brooks, C. (2010). Distance education in a post-Fordist time: Negotiating difference. In M. F. Cleveland-Innes & D. R. Garrison (Eds.), An introduction to distance education: Understanding teaching and learning in a new era (pp. 69–90). Routledge.
  • Lane, A. (2014). Placing students at the heart of the iron triangle and the interaction equivalence theorem models. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2014(2). https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.ac
  • Maboe, M. J., Eloff, M., & Schoeman, M. (2018). The role of accessibility and usability in bridging the digital divide for students with disabilities in an e-learning environment. In E. Petratos (Ed.), SAICSIT '18—Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists (pp. 222–228). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3278681.3278708
  • Maboe, M. J., Eloff, M., & Schoeman, M. (2019). Analysis of students with and without disabilities in an e-learning setting. In C. de Villiers (Ed.), SAICSIT’19—Proceedings of the Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists (pp. 1–7). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351108.3351138
  • Meekosha, H. (2011). Decolonising disability: Thinking and acting globally. Disability & Society, 26(6), 667–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2011.602860
  • McGuire, A. (2010). Disability, non-disability and the politics of mourning: Re-conceiving the ‘we’. Disability Studies Quarterly, 30(3/4). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v30i3/4.1282
  • Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
  • Ndlovu, S. (2021). Provision of assistive technology for students with disabilities in South African higher education. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 3892, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18083892
  • Ngubane-Mokiwa, S. A., & Khoza, S. B. (2021). Using community of inquiry (CoI) to facilitate the design of a holistic e-learning experience for students with visual impairments. Education Sciences, 11, 152–164. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11040152
  • Ngubane-Mokiwa, S. A., & Zongozzi, J. N. (2021). Exclusion reloaded: The chronicles of COVID-19 on students with disabilities in a South African open distance learning context. Journal of Intellectual Disability-Diagnosis and Treatment, 9(1), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2021.09.01.17
  • Ntombela, S. (2020). Teaching and learning support for students with disabilities: Issues and perspectives in open distance e-learning. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(3), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.761919
  • Ntombela, S. (2022). Reimagining South African higher education in response to Covid-19 and ongoing exclusion of students with disabilities. Disability & Society, 37(3), 534–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2021.2004880
  • Paperpile. (2022). The top list of academic research databases. https://paperpile.com/g/academic-research-databases/
  • Peters, O. (1983). Distance education and industrial production: A comparative interpretation in outline. In D. Stewart, D. Keegan, & B. Holmberg (Eds.), Distance education: International perspectives (pp. 95–113). Croom Helm Routledge.
  • Peters, O. (1993). Understanding distance education. In K. Harry, J. Magnus, & D. Keegan (Eds.), Distance education: New perspectives (pp. 10–19). Routledge.
  • Peters, O. (2010). Distance education in transition: Developments and issues. BIS-Verlag der Carl-von-Ossietzky-University.
  • Peters, M. D., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Parker, D., & Soares, C. B. (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Implementation, 13(3), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050
  • Pfeiffer, D., & Kiger, G. (1995). Introduction. Disability studies and the study of disability. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, 17(4), 381–390.
  • Power, T. M., & Morven-Gould, A. (2011). Head of gold, feet of clay: The online learning paradox. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(2), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i2.916
  • Prinsloo, P. (2015). The impact of an ethics of care on the iron triangle in ODL. In A. M. Teixeira, A. Szücs, & I. Mázár, I. (Eds.), Expanding learning scenarios: Opening out the educational landscape—Proceedings of the European Distance and E-Learning Network Annual Conference (pp. 55–63). European Distance and E-Learning Network. https://www.eden-online.org/proc-2485/index.php/PROC/article/view/1345/1053
  • Saldana, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
  • Subrayen, R., & Dhunpath, R. (2019). A snapshot of the chalkboard writing experiences of Bachelor of Education students with visual disabilities in South Africa. African Journal of Disability, 8, Article 523. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v8i0.523
  • Tekane R., & Potgieter, M. (2021). Insights from training a blind student in biological sciences. South African Journal of Science, 117(5/6), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2014.995394
  • Teixeira, A. M., Bates, T., & Mota, J. (2019). What future(s) for distance education universities? Towards an open network based approach. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 22(1). https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3314/331459398006/331459398006.pdf
  • Thomas, C. (2004) How is disability understood? An examination of sociological approaches, Disability & Society, 19(6), 569–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/0968759042000252506
  • Thomas, C. (2007). Sociologies of disability and illness: Contested ideas in disability studies and medical sociology. Bloomsbury.
  • Titchkosky, T., & Aubrecht, K. (2015). WHO's MIND, whose future? Mental health projects as colonial logics. Social Identities, 21(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2014.996994
  • Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K., Colquhoun, H., Kastner, M., Levac, D., Ng, C., Pearson Sharpe, J., Wilson, K., Kenny, M., Warren, R., Wilson, C., Stelfox, H. T., & Straus, S. E. (2016). A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 16(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0116-4
  • Uleanya, C. (2022). Scholarly discourse of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) and education in Botswana: A scoping review. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11298-9
  • UNESCO. (n.d.). Unpacking Sustainable Development Goal 4: Education 2030. https://docs.campaignforeducation.org/post2015/SDG4.pdf
  • Van Der Merwe, M. (2017, August 15). Students with disabilities disadvantaged at higher education level. Daily & Maverick. https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2017-08-15-students-with-disabilities-disadvantaged-at-higher-education-level/
  • van Jaarsveldt, D.E., & Ndeya-Ndereya, C.N. (2015). ‘It’s not my problem’: Exploring lecturers’ distancing behaviour towards students with disabilities. Disability & Society, 30(2), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2014.994701
  • Zawacki-Richter, O. (2019). The industrialization theory of distance education revisited. In I. Jung (Ed.), Open and distance education theory revisited (pp. 21–29). SpringerLink. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7740-2_3
  • Zongozzi, J.N. (2020). Accessible quality higher education for students with disabilities in a South African open distance and e-learning institution: Challenges. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 1645–1657. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2020.1822518

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.