New learner subjects? Reforming the rural child for a modern India

References

• Alexander, R. (2008). Education for all, the quality imperative and the problem of pedagogy. London: CREATE.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B.B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Corbridge, S., & Harris, J. (2000). Reinventing India: Liberalization, Hindu nationalism, and popular democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Government of India. (GoI). (2009). Report of the expert group to review the methodology for estimation of poverty. New Delhi: Planning Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, L.J. (2007). (Re)visioning the centre: Education reform and the ‘ideal’ citizen of the future. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 39(2), 197–215.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, K. (2005). Political agenda of education: A study of colonialist and nationalist ideas. New Delhi: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lalitha, M. (2003). Evaluation of Nali Kali approach under Janashala programme in Karnataka. Final Report, 2002–03. Mysore: University of Mysore.
   Google Scholar
• Maton, K. (2000). Languages of legitimation: The structuring significance for intellectual fields of strategic knowledge claims. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21(2), 147–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maton, K., & Wright, H.K. (2002). Returning cultural studies to education. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 5(4), 379–392.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, A. (2004). The good teacher: Dominant discourses in teaching and teacher education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, J. (1998). The well-tempered learner: Self-regulation, pedagogical models and teacher education policy. Comparative Education, 34(2), 177–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Curriculum Framework. (2000). National curriculum framework, 2000. New Delhi: NCERT.
   Google Scholar
• National University of Education Planning and Administration. (2009). Elementary education in India. Where do we stand? State Report Cards, 2008–09. New Delhi: NUEPA.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, A. (2006). Neo-liberalism as exception: Mutations in citizenship and sovereignty. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popkewitz, T. (1995). Teacher education, reform and the politics of knowledge in the United States. In M. Ginburg & B. Lindsay (Eds.), The political dimension in teacher education (pp. 54–75). London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N., & Miller, P. (1992). Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 173–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarangapani, P. (2003). Constructing school knowledge: An ethnography of learning in an Indian village. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sarangapani, P., & Vasavi, A.R. (2003). Aided programmes or guided policies? DPEP in Karnataka. Economic and Political Weekly, 38(2), 3401–3407.
   Google Scholar
• Schweisfurth, M. (2011). Learner centred education in developing country contexts: From solution to problem?. International Journal for Educational Development, 31(5), 425–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, R., & Green, A. (1975). Education and social control: A study in progressive primary education. London: Routledge & Keagan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Sriprakash, A. (2012). Pedagogies for development: The politics and practice of child-centred education in India. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Steedman, C. (1986). Landscape for a good woman: A story of two lives. London: Virago.
   Google Scholar
• Tabulawa, R. (2003). International aid agencies, learner-centred pedagogy and political democratisation: A critique. Comparative Education, 39(1), 7–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsoukas, H. (1997). The tyranny of light: The temptations and the paradoxes of the information society. Futures, 29(9), 827–843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, D. (1993). Making better children. In D. Meredyth & D. Tyler (Eds.), Child and citizen: Genealogies of schooling and subjectivity (pp. 35–61). Queensland: Griffith University.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2004). Education for all: The quality imperative (EFA global monitoring report 2005). Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar