The Australian Curriculum: History – the challenges of a thin curriculum?

References

• Apple, M. (1990). Ideology and the curriculum (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Department of Education and Workplace Relations (DEWR). (2008). Quality education: The case for an education revolution in our schools. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2009, May). Shape of the Australian Curriculum: History. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2010, December). Shape of the Australian curriculum, v. 2.0. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (1993). Education, majorism and ‘the curriculum of the dead’. Curriculum Studies, 1(2), 195–214. Retrieved from www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/0965975930010202
   Google Scholar
• Barber, B. (2004). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age, twentieth anniversary revision. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boomer, G. (Ed.). (1982). Negotiating the curriculum: A teacher–student partnership. Sydney: Ashton Scholastic.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, L., & Kennedy, K. (2003). Curriculum construction. French's Forest: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, P. (2008). Educators and education for democracy: Moving beyond ‘thin’ democracy. Inter-American Journal of Education for Democracy, 1(2), 147–165. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/ried/article/view/130/215
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. (1998). Social change and curriculum futures. Change: Transformations in Education, 1(1), 84–90. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/ried/article/view/130/215
   Google Scholar
• Council for the Australian Federation. (2007). Federalist Paper 2, The future of schooling in Australia: A report by the States and Territories. Melbourne: Department of Premier and Cabinet (DPC).
   Google Scholar
• Ditchburn, G. M. (2012). The Australian curriculum: Finding the hidden narrative? Critical Studies in Education, 53(3), 347–360. doi:10.1080/17508487.2012.703137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubnick, M. (2003). Accountability through thick and thin: Preliminary explorations. Working paper. Institute of Governance, Public policy and Social Research, Queens University, Belfast. Retrieved August 23, 2012, from http://www.scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/indes.php/ried/article/download/…/215
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. (1992). Curriculum ideologies. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum: A project of the American Educational Research Association (pp. 302–326). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, R., & Sykes, G. (1992). Curriculum policy. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum: A project of the American Educational Research Association (pp. 185–215). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1970/2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Gandin, L., & Apple, M. (2005). Thin versus thick democracy in education: Porto Alegre and the creation of alternatives to neo-liberalism. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 12(2), 99–116. doi:10.1080/09620210200200085
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In C. Geertz (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (pp. 3–30). New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. (1981). Ideology, culture and the process of schooling. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. (2010). In defense of public school teachers in a time of crisis. Truth-out. Retrieved August 13, 2013, from http://www.truth-out.org/archive/item/89022:in-defense-of-public-school-teachers-in-a-time-of-crisis
   Google Scholar
• Gonzales, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (Eds.). (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorising practices in households, communities and classrooms. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, M. (1975). Curriculum and consciousness. In W. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists (pp. 299–317). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
   Google Scholar
• Grundy, S. (1987). Curriculum: Product or praxis? Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B., & Reid, A. (Eds.). (1999). Contesting the curriculum. Katoomba: Social Science Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, J. L. (1989). Getting beyond the facts: Teaching social studies in the late twentieth century. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, J. L. (2008). Critical constructivism. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G. (1998). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. In L. E. Beyer & M. W. Apple (Eds.), The curriculum: Problems, politics and possibilities (2nd ed., pp. 201–229). Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B. (2010). Policy borrowing, policy learning: Testing times in Australian schooling. Critical Studies in Education, 51(2), 129–147. doi:10.1080/17508481003731026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., Rawolle, S., & Taylor, S. (2005). Globalising policy sociology in education: Working with Bourdieu. Journal of Education Policy, 20(6), 759–777. doi:10.1080/02680930500238945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, A., Woods, A., & Weir, K. (Eds.). (2013). Curriculum, syllabus design and equity: A primer and model. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McConney, A., & Price, A. (2009). Teaching out-of-field in Western Australia. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 34(6), 86–100. doi:10.14221/ajte.2009v34n6.6
   Google Scholar
• Reid, A. (2005). Rethinking National curriculum collaboration: Towards an Australian curriculum. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, A. (2009, October 2–4). Is this a revolution? A critical analysis of the Rudd Government's national education agenda. Garth Boomer address. ACSA biennial conference. Canberra: Australian Curriculum Studies Association. Retrieved March 5, 2013, from htttp://www.acsa.edu.au/pages/page484.asp
   Google Scholar
• Senate Standing Committee on Employment, Workplace Relations and Education. (2007). Quality of school education. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Shankman, P. (1984). The thick and thin: On the interpretive theoretical program of Clifford Geertz. Current Anthropology, 25(3), 261–280. doi:10.1086/203135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shor, I. (1992). Empowering education: Critical teaching for social change. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, J., Angus, L., Down, B., & McInerney, P. (2009). Critically engaged learning: Connecting to young lives. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Walzer, M. (1994). Thick and thin: Moral argument at home and abroad. Indiana, IN: Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, G. H. (1998). Democracy and the curriculum. In L. E. Beyer & M. W. Apple (Eds.), The curriculum: Problems, politics and possibilities (2nd ed., pp. 177–198). Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, L. (2011, October 7–9). Australia's Curriculum dilemmas: state cultures and the big issues Curriculum Studies Association Conference, Sydney. Retrieved from http://www.acsa.edu.au/pages/page53.asp
   Google Scholar
• Zyngier, D. (2010, November 28–December 2). Re-discovering democracy: Putting action (back) into active citizenship and praxis into practice. Australian Association of Research in Education Conference, Melbourne. Retrieved http://publications.aare.edu.au/10pap/abs10.htm#Z
   Google Scholar