The cost of performance? Students' learning about acting as change agents in their schools

References

• Apple, M. (1995). Education and power. New York, NY: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, D. G. (2004). Organisation in the mind: Psychoanalysis, group relations and organizational consultancy (Tavistock Clinic Series). London: Karnac Books.
   Google Scholar
• Arnot, M., & Reay, D. (2007). A sociology of pedagogic voice: Power, inequality and pupil consultation. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 28(3), 311–325. doi:10.1080/01596300701458814
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (2004). Identity. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bazalgette, J., Reed, B., Kehoe, I., & Reed, J. (2006). Leading schools from failure to success. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge UIT.
   Google Scholar
• Bland, D., & Atweh, B. (2007). Students as researchers: Engaging students’ voices in PAR. Educational Action Research, 15(3), 337–349. doi:10.1080/09650790701514259
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, V. C. (1977). Reproduction in society, education and culture. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, S., & Gintes, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bragg, S. (2007). Student voice and governmentality: The production of enterprising subjects? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 28(3), 343–358. doi:10.1080/01596300701458905
   Google Scholar
• Cassell, C., & Symon, G. (Eds.). (2004). Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. (2006). Sound, presence, and power: ‘Student voice’ in educational research and reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(4), 359–390. doi:10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00363.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielding, M. (2001a). Beyond the rhetoric of student voice: New departures or new constraints in the transformation of 21st century schooling? Forum, 43(2), 100–112. doi:10.2304/forum.2001.43.2.1
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, M. (2001b). Students as radical agents of change. Journal of Educational Change, 2(3), 123–141. doi:10.1023/A:1017949213447
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, M. (2004a). ‘New wave’ student voice and the renewal of civic society. London Review of Education, 2(3), 197–217. doi:10.1080/1474846042000302834
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, M. (2004b). Transformative approaches to student voice: Theoretical underpinnings, recalcitrant realities. British Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 295–311. doi:10.1080/0141192042000195236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielding, M. (2006). Leadership, personalization and high performance schooling: Naming the new totalitarianism. School Leadership & Management, 26(4), 347–369. doi:10.1080/13632430600886889
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, M. (2007). The human cost and intellectual poverty of high performance schooling: Radical philosophy, John MacMurray and the remaking of person-centred education. Journal of Education Policy, 22(4), 383–409. doi:10.1080/02680930701390511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielding, M., & Bragg, S. (2003). Students as researchers: Making a difference. Cambridge, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. A. (1983). Theories of reproduction and resistance in the new sociology of education: A critical analysis. Harvard Educational Review, 53(3), 257–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holdsworth, R., & Thomson, P. (2002, April). Options with the regulation and containment of student voice and/or students’ research and acting for change: Australian experiences. Paper presented at the AERA Symposium, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Hutton, J. (1997). Organisation-in-the-mind. In J. E. Neumann (Ed.), Developing organisational consultancy (pp. 113–126). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Illich, I. (1970). Deschooling society. London: Marion Boyars.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, P. W. (1968). Life in classrooms. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lodge, C. (2005). From hearing voices to engaging in dialogue: Problematising student participation in school improvement. Journal of Educational Change, 6(2), 125–146. doi:10.1007/s10833-005-1299-3
   Google Scholar
• Lumby, J. (2009). Performativity and identity: Mechanisms of exclusion. Journal of Education Policy, 24(3), 353–369. doi:10.1080/02680930802669284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manefield, J., Collins, C., Moore, J., Mahar, S., & Warne, C. (2007). Student voice: A historical perspective and new directions. Victoria, Australia: Department for Education Report.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, D., Pedder, D., & Rudduck, J. (2005). Pupil voice: Comfortable and uncomfortable learnings for teachers. Research Papers in Education, 20(2), 149–168. doi:10.1080/02671520500077970
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, D. L. (2006). Student voice from the inside and outside: The positioning of challengers. International Journal of Leadership in Education Theory and Practice, 9(4), 315–328. doi:10.1080/13603120600895379
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, D. (2007). Student voice in school reform: From listening to leadership. In D. Thiessen & A. Cook-Sather (Eds.), International handbook of student experience in elementary and secondary school (pp. 727–744). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Noyes, A. (2005). Pupil voice: Purpose, power and the possibilities for democratic schooling. British Educational Research Journal, 31(4), 533–540. doi:10.1080/01411920500153614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postman, N., & Weingartner, C. (1971). Teaching as a subversive activity. New York, NY: Delta.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, L. F., & Brown, T. M. (2009). From voice to agency: Guiding principles for participatory action research with youth. New Directions for Youth Development, 2009(123), 19–34. doi:10.1002/yd.312
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silva, E. (2001). ‘Squeaky wheels and flat tyres’: A case study of students as reform participants. Forum, 43(2), 95–99. doi:10.2304/forum.2001.43.2.15
   Google Scholar
• SooHoo, S. (1993). Students as partners in research and restructuring schools. The Educational Forum, 57(4), 386–393. doi:10.1080/00131729309335445
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, G. (2010). Acting, accidents and performativity: Challenging the hegemonic good student in secondary schools. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31(4), 413–430. doi:10.1080/01425692.2010.484919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, P., & Gunter, H. (2005, April). Researching students: Voices and processes in a school evaluation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montréal, Quebec.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, P., & Gunter, H. (2006). From ‘consulting pupils’ to ‘pupils as researchers’: A situated case narrative. British Educational Research Journal, 32(6), 839–856. doi:10.1080/01411920600989487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Maanen, J. E., & Schein, E. H. (1977). Toward a theory of organisational socialization. Boston, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, G. (1971). Resistance to change. American Behavioral Scientist, 14(5), 745–766. doi:10.1177/000276427101400507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labour: Why working class kids get working class jobs. Farnborough: Saxon House.
   Google Scholar
• Whitty, G., & Wisby, E. (2007). Whose voice? An exploration of the current policy interest in pupil involvement in school decision-making. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 17(3), 303–319. doi:10.1080/09620210701543957
   Google Scholar
• Youdell, D. (2004). Engineering school markets, constituting schools and subjectivating students: The bureaucratic, institutional and classroom dimensions of educational triage. Journal of Education Policy, 19(4), 407–431. doi:10.1080/0268093042000227474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar