What is Plan B? Using Foucault's archaeology to enhance policy analysis

References

• Akerlind, G. (2002, November). Principles and practice in phenomenographic research. Paper presented at the Current Issues in Phenomenography Conference, Australian National University, Canberra, 27–30 November.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew, M. D. (1997). What matters most for teacher educators. Journal of Teacher Education, 48, 167–176. doi:10.1177/0022487197048003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apple, M. (2001). Educating the right way. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2012). Australian professional standards for teachers. Melbourne, VIC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Avis, J. (2005). Beyond performativity: Reflections on activist professionalism and the labour process in further education. Journal of Education Policy, 20, 209–222. doi:10.1080/0268093052000341403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (1993). What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 13(2), 10–17. doi:10.1080/0159630930130203
   Google Scholar
• Barber, M., & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world's best-performing schools come out on top. London: McKinsey.
   Google Scholar
• Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39, 175–189. doi:10.1080/03057640902902252
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, L. E. (2002). The politics of standards and the education of teachers. Teaching Education, 13, 305–316. doi:10.1080/1047621022000023280
   Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, D. (2006, November). A new discourse for teacher professionalism: Ramsey, standards and accountability. Paper presented at the AARE 2006 Conference, Adelaide, 27–30 November. Retrieved July 28, 2011, from http://www.aare.edu.au/06pap/blo06777.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bourke, T. (2011). Teacher professional standards: Mirage or miracle cure—an archaeology of professionalism in education ( PhD thesis). Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Bourke, T., Lidstone, J., & Ryan, M. E. (2013). Teachers performing professionalism: A Foucauldian archaeology. SAGE Open, 3(4), 1–14. doi:10.1177/2158244013511261
   Google Scholar
• Bourke, T., Lidstone, J., & Ryan, M. E. (in press). Schooling teachers: Professionalism or disciplinary power? Educational Philosophy and Theory.
   Google Scholar
• Bourke, T., Ryan, M. E., & Lidstone, J. (2012). Reclaiming professionalism for geography education: Defending our own territory. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 990–998. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourke, T., Ryan, M. E., & Lidstone, J. (2013). Reflexive professionalism: Reclaiming the voice of authority in shaping the discourses of education policy. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 41, 398–413. doi:10.1080/1359866X.2013.838619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadbourne, R. (1999). Australian views on the American National Board Standards for early childhood teachers. Unicorn, 25(2), 37–59.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Australian Governments (COAG). (2008). National partnership on improving teacher quality. Canberra: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Crowley, R. (1998). A class act: Inquiry into the status of the teaching profession. Canberra: Senate Employment, Education and Training References Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (1992). Creating standards of practice and delivery for learner-centered schools. Stanford Law and Policy Review, 4, 37–52.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Policy and change: Getting beyond bureaucracy. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), International handbook of educational change (pp. 642–667). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Reshaping teaching policy, preparation and practice: Influences of the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. Washington, DC: AACTE.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2001). Standard setting in teaching: Changes in licensing, certification and assessment. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 751–776). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, L. (2008). Professionalism, professionality and the development of education professionals. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(1), 20–38. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8527.2007.00392.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, L. (2011). The ‘shape’ of teacher professionalism in England: Professional standards, performance management, professional development and the changes proposed in the 2010 White Paper. British Educational Research Journal, 37, 851–870. doi:10.1080/01411926.2011.607231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evetts, J. (2009). The management of professionalism: A contemporary paradox. In S. Gewirtz, P. Mahony, I. Hextall, & A. Cribb (Eds.), Changing teacher professionalism: International trends, challenges and ways forward (pp. 19–30). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fenech, M., Sumsion, J., & Shepherd, W.(2010). Promoting early childhood teacher professionalism in the Australian context: The place of resistance. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 11(1), 89–105. doi:10.2304/ciec.2010.11.1.89
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. (A. M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1991). Remarks on Marx: Conversations with Duccio Trombadori. (R. J. Goldstein & J. Cascaito, Trans.). New York, NY: Semiotext.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1994). Power. (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York, NY: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freebody, P. (2003). Qualitative research in education: Interaction and practice. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Furlong, J., Barton, L., Miles, S., Whiting, C., & Whitty, G. (2000). Teacher education in transition: Reforming professionalism? Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gipps, C. (1990). The debate over standards and the use of testing. In B. Moon, J. Isaac, & J. Powney (Eds.), Judging standards and effectiveness in education (pp. 32–46). London: The Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Goodson, I., & Hargreaves, A. (1996). Teachers’ professional lives: Aspirations and actualities. In I. Goodson & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teachers’ professional lives (pp. 1–27). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (2001). Foucault: Power, knowledge and discourse. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse theory and practice: A reader (pp. 72–81). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2003, October). Teachers make a difference. What is the research evidence? Paper presented at the Australian Council for Educational Research Annual Conference on Building Teacher Quality, Melbourne, 19–21 October.
   Google Scholar
• Helsby, G. (1995). Teachers’ construction of professionalism in England in the 1990s. Journal of Education for Teaching, 21, 317–332. doi:10.1080/02607479550038536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helsby, G. (1996). Defining and developing professionalism in English secondary schools. Journal of Education for Teaching, 22(2), 135–148. doi:10.1080/02607479620313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helsby, G. (2000). Multiple truths and contested realities: The changing faces of teacher professionalism in England. In C. Day, A. Fernandez, T. Hague, & J. Møller (Eds.), The life and work of teachers: International perspectives in changing times (pp. 93–108). London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ingvarson, L. (1995). Professional credentials: Standards for primary and secondary science teaching in Australia. Canberra: Australian Science Teachers Association.
   Google Scholar
• Ingvarson, L. (1998). Teaching standards: Foundations for professional development reform. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), International handbook of educational change (pp. 1006–1031). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Ingvarson, L. (1999). The power of professional recognition. Unicorn, 25(2), 60–71.
   Google Scholar
• Ingvarson, L. (2002a). Development of a national standards framework for the teaching profession. Alexandria, NSW: Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Ingvarson, L. (2002b). Strengthening the profession? A comparison of recent reforms in the UK and the USA. Melbourne: ACER.
   Google Scholar
• Ingvarson, L. (2010). Recognising accomplished teachers in Australia: Where have we been? Where are we heading? Australian Journal of Education, 54(1), 46–71. doi:10.1177/000494411005400105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingvarson, L., & Kleinhenz, E. (2003). A review of standards of practice for beginning teaching. Alexandria, NSW: Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, B. (2010). What teachers want: Better teacher management. Melbourne: Grattan Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, G., & Wickham, G. (1999). Using Foucault's methods. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Leaton Gray, S., & Whitty, G. (2010). Social trajectories or disrupted identities? Changing and competing models of teacher professionalism under New Labour. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(1), 5–23. doi:10.1080/03057640903567005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louden, W. (2000). Standards for standards: The development of Australian professional standards for teaching. Australian Journal of Education, 44(2), 118–134. doi:10.1177/000494410004400203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahony, P., & Hextall, I. (2000). Reconstructing teaching: Standards, performance and accountability. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, I. (2010). Suicide: Foucault, history and truth. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, D., Mitchell, J., Macdonald, D., & Bell, R. (2005). Professional standards for teachers: A case study of professional learning. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 33, 159–179. doi:10.1080/13598660500121977
   Google Scholar
• Millett, A. (1997). Letter to providers, 26 June. London: TTA.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, S. (2003). Michel Foucault. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (MCEETYA). (2008). Melbourne declaration on educational goals for young Australians. Melbourne: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, D. (2011). Assembling the ‘accomplished’ teacher: The performativity and politics of professional teaching standards. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(1), 94–113. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00617.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2005). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2009, December). Teacher evaluation: A conceptual framework and examples of country practices. Paper presented at the OECD-Mexico Workshop, Towards a teacher evaluation framework in Mexico: International practices, criteria and mechanisms, Mexico City, 1–2 December.
   Google Scholar
• O'Farrell, C. (2005). Michel Foucault. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• O'Farrell, C. (2013). Michel Foucault: The unconscious of history and culture. In N. Partner, & S. Foot (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of historical theory (pp. 162–182). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Osgood, J. (2006). Deconstructing professionalism in early childhood education: Resisting the regulatory gaze. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 7(1), 5–14. doi:10.2304/ciec.2006.7.1.5
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, M. (1999). Standards and professional practice: The TTA and initial teaching training. British Journal of Educational Studies, 47, 247–260. doi:10.1111/1467-8527.00117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. E., & Bourke, T. (2013). The teacher as reflexive professional: Making visible the excluded discourse in teacher standards. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34, 411–423. doi:10.1080/01596306.2012.717193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. (2003a). Teacher professional standards: Controlling or developing teachers. Teachers and Teaching, 9(2), 175–186. doi:10.1080/13540600309373
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. (2003b). The activist teaching profession. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. (2004). Sitting uneasily at the table: Quality assurance and professionalism. In M. Walker & J. Nixon (Eds), Reclaiming universities from a runaway world (pp. 100–113). Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. (2005a, May). Activist teachers: A professional responsibility for a responsible profession. Invited paper at Changing teacher roles, identities and professionalism seminar, Kings College London, 16 May.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. (2005b, August). Professional standards: Quality teachers for the future. Paper presented at the Sharing experience: Ways forward on standards conference, Melbourne, 21 August.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. (2005c). Teacher professional standards: A policy strategy to control, regulate or enhance the teaching profession. In N. Bascia, A. Cumming, A. Datnow, K. Leithwood, & D. Livingstone (Eds.), International handbook of educational policy (pp. 579–592). Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. (2011, April). Accountability, standards and teacher activism: An unholy trinity or the way for the profession to shape the future. Paper presented at the PPTA annual conference, Wellington New Zealand, 18–20 April.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, J., & Mockler, N. (2011). Performance cultures of teaching: Threat or opportunity? In C. Day & L. Lo (Eds.), International handbook of teacher and school development (pp. 33–43). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Sergiovanni, T. (1998). Organization, market and community as strategies for change: What works best for deep changes in schools. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), International Handbook of Educational Change (pp. 576–595). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, M., & Kelchtermans, G. (2008). Teacher professionalism in Flemish policy on teacher education: A critical analysis of the Decree on teacher education (2006) in Flanders, Belgium. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 14, 283–294. doi:10.1080/13540600802037686
   Google Scholar
• Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swann, M., McIntyre, D., Pell, T., Hargreaves, L., & Cunningham, M. (2010). Teachers’ conceptions of teacher professionalism in England in 2003 and 2006. British Educational Research Journal, 36, 549–571. doi:10.1080/01411920903018083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, S. Y. F., Cheng, M. M. H., & So, W. W. M. (2006). Supporting student teachers’ professional learning with standards-referenced assessment. Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 34, 223–244. doi:10.1080/13598660600720629
   Google Scholar
• Wong, J. L. N. (2008). How does the new emphasis on managerialism in education redefine teacher professionalism? A case study in Guangdong Province of China. Educational Review, 60, 267–281. doi:10.1080/00131910802195869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yinger, R. J., & Hendricks-Lee, M. S. (2000). The language of standards and teacher education reform. Educational Policy, 14(1), 94–106. doi:10.1177/0895904800014001008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar