Becoming dishuman: thinking about the human through dis/ability

References

• Armstrong, D. (2002). The politics of self-advocacy and people with learning difficulties. Policy & Politics, 30, 333–345. doi:10.1332/030557302760094702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, C. (2012). The social model of disability: Valuable or irrelevant? In N. Watson, A. Roulstone, & C. Thomas (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of disability studies (pp. 12–29). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, T., & Booth, W. (1994). Parenting under pressure: Mothers and fathers with learning difficulties. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2003). Becoming woman: Or sexual difference revisited. Theory, Culture & Society, 20(3), 43–64. doi:10.1177/02632764030203004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2006). Posthuman, all too human: Towards a new process ontology. Theory, Culture and Society, 23, 197–208. doi:10.1177/0263276406069232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, F. K. (2009). Contours of ableism: Territories, objects, disability and desire. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J., & Oliver, M. (1996). Disability politics: Understanding our past, changing our future. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, L. J. (1995). Enforcing normalcy: Disability, deafness, and the body. New York, NY: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, L. J. (2002). Bending over backwards. Disability, dismodernism and other difficult positions. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. (2001). Valuing people, a new strategy for learning disability for the 21st century. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. (2013). Transforming care: A national response to Winterbourne View hospital. London: BBC Productions. Retrieved February 1, 2014, http://www.gov.uk/government/publications/winterbourne-view-hospital-department-of-health-review-and-response
   Google Scholar
• Erevelles, N. (1996). Disability and the dialectics of difference. Disability & Society, 11, 519–538. doi:10.1080/09687599627570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erevelles, N. (2002a). Voices of silence: Foucault, disability and the question of self-determination. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 21(1), 17–35. doi:10.1023/A:1014473121819
   Google Scholar
• Erevelles, N. (2002b). (Im)material citizens: Cognitive disability, race and the politics of citizenship. Disability, Culture and Education, 1(1), 5–25.
   Google Scholar
• Gillman, M., Swain, J., & Heyman, B. (1997). Life history or ‘case’ history: The objectification of people with learning difficulties through the tyranny of professional discourses. Disability and Society, 12, 675–694. doi:10.1080/09687599726985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. (2000). Self-advocacy in the lives of people with learning disabilities. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. (2011). Disability studies: An interdisciplinary introduction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. (2012). Dis/entangling critical disability studies. Disability & Society, 27, 631–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. (2014). Dis/ability studies: Theorising disablism and ableism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D., Lawthorn, R., & Runswick-Cole, K. (in press). Posthuman disability studies.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2012). The body as disability and possibility: Theorizing the ‘leaking, lacking and excessive’ bodies of disabled children. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 15(1), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Kittay, E. F. (2002). Love's labor revisited. Hypatia, 17, 237–250. doi:10.2979/HYP.2002.17.3.237
   Google Scholar
• Kittay, E. F. (2009). The personal is philosophical is political: A philosopher and mother of a cognitively disabled person sends notes from the battlefield. Metaphilosophy, 40, 606–627. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01600.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kittay, E. F., & Carlson, L. (2010). Introduction: Rethinking philosophical presumptions in the light of cognitive disability. In E. F. Kittay, & L. Carlson (Eds.), Cognitive disability and its challenge to moral philosophy (pp. 1–25). Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, S. (Producer). (2013, October 22). DIY SOS [Series 24, Episode 1]. London: BBC Productions.
   Google Scholar
• McRuer, R. (2006). Crip theory. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, J. (1991). Pride against prejudice: Transforming attitudes to disability. London: The Women's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Puar, J. (2012). ‘I would rather be a cyborg than a goddess’: Becoming-intersectional of assemblage theory. Philosophia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 2(1), 49–66.
   Google Scholar
• Ramlow, T. R. (2006). Bodies in the borderlands: Gloria Anzaldua's and David Wojnarowicz's mobility machines. MELUS, 31, 169–187. doi:10.1093/melus/31.3.169
   Google Scholar
• Runswick-Cole, K., & Goodley, D. (2011). The ‘big society’: A dismodernist critique. Disability & Society, 26, 881–885. doi:10.1080/09687599.2011.618743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. (2013). Disability rights and wrongs revisited. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sykes, H. (2009). The body project: From lesbians in physical education to queer bodies in/out of school. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 13, 238–254. doi:10.1080/10894160902876671
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thomas, C. (2007). Sociologies of disability, ‘impairment’, and chronic illness: Ideas in disability studies and medical sociology. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Titchkosky, T. (2011). The question of access: Disability, space, meaning. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Titchkosky, T. (2012). The ends of the body as pedagogic possibility. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 34(3–4), 82–93. doi:10.1080/10714413.2012.686851
   Google Scholar
• Titchkosky, T. ( in press). Monitoring disability: The question of the ‘human’ in human rights projects. In C. Schlund-Vials & M. Gill (Eds.), Collection on disability, human rights, and humanitarianism. Farnham: Ashgate Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vehmas, S., & Watson, N. (2013). Moral wrongs, disadvantages, and disability: A critique of critical disability studies. Disability & Society, 29, 638–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendell, S. (1996). The rejected body: Feminist philosophical reflections on disability. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wynter, S. (2003). Unsettling the coloniality of being/power/truth/freedom. Towards the human, after man, its overrepresentation – an argument. CR: The New Centennial Review, 3, 257–337. doi:10.1353/ncr.2004.0015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar