Re/assembling spaces of learning in Victorian government schools: policy enactments, pedagogic encounters and micropolitics

References

• Anderson, B., & McFarlane, C. (2011). Assemblage and geography. Area, 43(2), 124–127. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01004.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S., Maguire, M., Braun, A., & Hoskins, K. (2011). Policy actors: Doing policy work in schools. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32, 625–639. doi:10.1080/01596306.2011.601565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, B., Sumsion, J., Stratigos, T., & Elwick, S. (2012). Baby events: Assembling descriptions of infants in family day care. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 13(2), 141–153. doi:10.2304/ciec.2012.13.2.141
   Google Scholar
• Braun, A., Maguire, M., & Ball, S. (2010). Policy enactment in the UK secondary school: Examining policy, practice and school positioning. Journal of Education Policy, 25, 547–560. doi:10.1080/02680931003698544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, R., & Ringrose, J. (Eds.). (2013). Deleuze and research methodologies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coole, D., & Frost, S. (Eds.). (2010). New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Early Childhood Development. (2009). Pedagogy and space: Transforming learning through innovation. Melbourne: State of Victoria (Department of Education and Early Childhood Development).
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Early Childhood Development. (2011). Making the most of flexible learning spaces: A guide for principals and teachers. Melbourne: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. F. (1949). Knowing and the known. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, R., & Clarke, J. (2002). Flexible learning, spatiality and identity. Studies in Continuing Education, 24, 153–165. doi:10.1080/0158037022000020965
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T. (2012). Matterings of knowing and doing: Sociomaterial approaches to understanding practice. In P. Hager, A. Lee, & A. Reich (Eds.), Practice, learning and change: Practice-theory perspectives on professional learning (pp. 67–83). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuk, P. (2011). Emerging approaches to educational research: Tracing the sociomaterial. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gherardi, S. (2006). Organizational knowledge: The texture of workplace learning. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gislason, N. (2007). Placing education: The school as architectural space. Paideusis, 16(3), 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Grace, G. (1995). School leadership: Beyond education management—An essay in policy scholarship. London and Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hetherington, K., & Law, J. (2000). After networks. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18(2), 127–132. doi:10.1068/d216t
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinchliffe, S. (2007). Geographies of nature: Societies, environments, ecologies. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Houle, K. (2011). Micropolitics. In C. J. Stivale (Ed.), Gilles Deleuze: Key concepts (pp. 103–115). Durham, NC: Acumen.
   Google Scholar
• Koyama, J. P., & Varenne, H. (2012). Assembling and dissembling: Policy as productive play. Educational Researcher, 41, 157–162. doi:10.3102/0013189X12442799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lackney, J. A. (2011). New approaches for school design. In F. W. English (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of educational leadership (2nd ed., pp. 353–381). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1999). Circulating reference: Sampling the soil in the Amazon forest. Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies (pp. 24–79). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford and New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2000). Comment on Suchman, and Gherardi and Nicolini: Knowing as displacing. Organization, 7, 349–354. doi:10.1177/135050840072009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2009). Actor-network theory and material semiotics. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), The new Blackwell companion to social theory (3rd ed., pp. 141–158). Chichester and Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J., Afdal, G., Asdal, K., Lin, W.-Y., Moser, I., & Singleton, V. (2013). Modes of syncretism: Notes on non-coherence. CRESC working paper number: 119. Retrieved from http://www.cresc.ac.uk/publications/modes-of-syncretism-notes-on-non-coherence
   Google Scholar
• Leander, K. M., Phillips, N. C., & Taylor, K. H. (2010). The changing social spaces of learning: Mapping new mobilities. Review of Research in Education, 34, 329–394. doi:10.3102/0091732X09358129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T. M. (2007). Practices of assemblage and community forest management. Economy and Society, 36, 263–293. doi:10.1080/03085140701254308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughlin, J. (2013). How photography as field notes helps in understanding the building the education revolution. The Australian Educational Researcher, 40, 535–548. doi:10.1007/s13384-013-0112-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire, M., Ball, S., & Braun, A. (2010). Behaviour, classroom management and student ‘control’: Enacting policy in the English secondary school. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 20, 153–170. doi:10.1080/09620214.2010.503066
   Google Scholar
• Marques, J., Veloso, L., & Sebastiao, J. (2013). How to rebuild a secondary school: Space, knowledge and education. In B. Boufoy-Bastick (Ed.), Cultures of educational policy (pp. 59–101). Strasbourg: Analytrics.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. (2007). World city. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerial Council on Education Employment Training and Youth Affairs. (MCEETYA). (2008). Learning spaces framework: Learning in an online world. Carlton South: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, D. (2011). Assembling the ‘accomplished’ teacher: The performativity and politics of professional teaching standards. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(Suppl. 1), 94–113. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00617.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, D. (2013). Turning around the question of ‘transfer’ in education: Tracing the sociomaterial. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45, 1276–1289. doi:10.1080/00131857.2013.763592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdoch, J. (1998). The spaces of actor-network theory. Geoforum, 29, 357–374. doi:10.1016/S0016-7185(98)00011-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nespor, J. (1994). Knowledge in motion: Space, time, and curriculum in undergraduate physics and management. London and Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, C., & Gan, L. (2012). Revolution or missed opportunity. Architecture Australia, 101(1), 74–78. Retrieved from http://architectureau.com/articles/revolution-or-missed-opportunity/
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, G. B. (2011). Peopling policy: On conflicting subjectivities of fee-paying students. In C. Shore, S. Wright, & D. Però (Eds.), Policy worlds: Anthropology and analysis of contemporary power (pp. 68–85). New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13, 249–273. doi:10.1287/orsc.13.3.249.2776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postma, D. (2012). Education as sociomaterial critique. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 20, 137–156. doi:10.1080/14681366.2012.649419
   Google Scholar
• Prince, R. (2010). Policy transfer as policy assemblage: Making policy for the creative industries in New Zealand. Environment and Planning A, 42, 169–186. doi:10.1068/a4224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shapin, S., & Schaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shore, C., & Wright, S. (2011). Conceptualising policy: Technologies of governance and the politics of visibility. In C. Shore, S. Wright, & D. Però (Eds.), Policy worlds: Anthropology and analysis of contemporary power (pp. 1–25). New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, P., Thomas, S., & Harris, J. (2013). Recontextualising policy discourses: A Bernsteinian perspective on policy interpretation, translation, enactment. Journal of Education Policy, 28, 465–480. doi:10.1080/02680939.2013.770554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen, E. (2009). The materiality of learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderstraeten, R., & Biesta, G. J. J. (2001). How is education possible? Preliminary investigations for a theory of education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 33(1), 7–21. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2001.tb00251.x
   Google Scholar