2,109
Views
39
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Introduction

The multiple effects of international large-scale assessment on education policy and research

&

References

  • Allen, J. (2009). Three spaces of power: Territory, networks, plus a topological twist in the tale of domination and authority. Journal of Power, 2, 197–212. doi:10.1080/17540290903064267
  • Allen, J. (2011). Topological twists: Power's shifting geographies. Dialogues in Human Geography, 1, 283–298. doi:10.1177/2043820611421546
  • Allen, J., & Cochrane, A. (2010). Assemblages of state power: Topological shifts in the organisation of government and politics. Antipode, 42, 1071–1089. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00794.x
  • Amin, A. (2002). Spatialities of globalisation. Environment and Planning A, 34, 385–399. doi:10.1068/a3439
  • Anagnostopoulos, D., Rutledge, S. A., & Jacobsen, R. (Eds.). (2013). The infrastructure of accountability: Data use and the transformation of American education. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.
  • Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalisation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Au, W., & Ferrare, J. J. (Eds.). (2015). Mapping corporate education reform: Power and policy networks in the neoliberal state. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Ball, S. (2012a). Global Education Inc.: New policy networks and the neo-liberal imaginary. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Ball, S. (2012b). Performativity, commodification and commitment: An I-spy guide to the neoliberal university. British Journal of Educational Studies, 60(1), 17–28. doi:10.1080/00071005.2011.650940
  • Ball, S., & Junemann, C. (2012). Networks, new governance and education. Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Beck, U. (2006). Cosmopolitan vision. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Bendix, R. (1978). Kings or people: Power and mandate to rule. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Breakspear, S. (2012). The policy impacts of PISA: An exploration of the normative effects of international benchmarking in school system performance. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 71, OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/5k9fdfqffr28-en
  • Brenner, N. (1999). Globalisation as reterritorialisation: The re-scaling of urban governance in the European Union. Urban Studies, 36, 431–451. doi:10.1080/0042098993466
  • Brenner, N. (2004). New state spaces: Urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Carvalho, L.-M., & Costa, E. (2015). Seeing education with one's own eyes and through PISA lenses: Considerations of the reception of PISA in European countries. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(5), 638–646.
  • Deleuze, G., & Guttari, F. (2013). A thousand plateaus. (B. Massumi, Trans.). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Dimitriadis, G. (2012). Critical dispositions: Evidence and expertise in education. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Eccleston, R. (2011). The OECD and global economic governance. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 65, 243–255. doi:10.1080/10357718.2011.550106
  • Engel, L. C., & Frizzell, M. O. (2015). Competitive comparison and PISA bragging rights: Sub-national uses of the OECD's PISA in Canada and the US. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(5), 665–682.
  • Gorur, R., & Wu, M. (2015). Leaning too far? PISA, Policy and Australia's ‘top five’ ambitions. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(5), 647–664.
  • Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: The PISA ‘effect’ in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37. doi:10.1080/02680930802412669
  • Hall, S. (1997). Representation. London: Sage.
  • Harvey, P. (2012). The topological quality of infrastructural relation: An ethnographic approach. Theory, Culture & Society, 29(4–5), 76–92. doi:10.1177/0263276412448827
  • Head, B. W. (2008). Three lenses of evidence-based policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67(1), 1–11. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.2007.00564.x
  • Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D., & Perraton, J. (1999). Global transformations: Politics, economics and culture. Oxford: Polity Press.
  • Hogan, A., Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2015). Network restructuring of global edu-business: The case of Pearson's efficacy framework. In W. Au & J. J. Ferrare (Eds.), Mapping corporate education reform: Power and policy networks in the neoliberal state (pp. 43–62). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Jessop, B. (2008). State power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Kallo, J. (2009). OECD education policy: A comparative and historical study focusing on the thematic reviews of tertiary education. Jyvaskyla: Jyvaskyla University Press.
  • Kitchin, R. (2014). Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society, 1–12. doi:10.1177/2053951714528481
  • Lewis, S., Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (in press). ‘PISA for Schools’: Topological rationality and new spaces of the OECD's educational governance. Comparative Education Review.
  • Lingard, B. (2006). Globalisation, the research imagination and deparochialising the study of education. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 4, 287–302. doi:10.1080/14767720600752734
  • Lingard, B. (2011). Policy as numbers: Ac/counting for educational research. The Australian Educational Researcher, 38, 355–382. doi:10.1007/s13384-011-0041-9
  • Lingard, B., & Sellar, S. (2013). Globalisation, edu-business and network governance: The policy sociology of Stephen J. Ball and rethinking education policy analysis. London Review of Education, 11, 265–280. doi:10.1080/14748460.2013.840986
  • Lingard, B., Sellar, S., & Baroutsis, A. (2015). Researching the habitus of global policy actors in education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 45(1), 25–42. doi:10.1080/0305764x.2014.988686
  • Lingard, B., Sellar, S., & Savage, G. C. (2014). Re-articulating social justice as equity in schooling policy: The effects of testing and data infrastructures. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 35, 710–730. doi:10.1080/01425692.2014.919846
  • Lingard, B., Martino, W., Rezai-Rashti, G., & Sellar, S. (2015). Globalising educational accountabilities. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Lury, C., Parisi, L., & Terranova, T. (2012). Introduction: The becoming topological of culture. Theory, Culture & Society, 29(4–5), 3–35. doi:10.1177/0263276412454552
  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans.). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Massey, D. (1994). Space, place and gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Massey, D. (1999). Power-geometries and the politics of space and time: Hettner Lecture, 1998. Heidelberg: Department of Geography, University of Heidelberg.
  • Morris, P. (2012). Pick ‘n’ mix, select and project; policy borrowing and the quest for ‘world class’ schooling: An analysis of the 2010 schools White Paper. Journal of Education Policy, 27(1), 89–107. doi:10.1080/02680939.2011.596226
  • Nóvoa, A., & Yariv-Mashal, T. (2003). Comparative research in education: A mode of governance or a historical journey? Comparative Education, 39, 423–438. doi:10.1080/0305006032000162002
  • Ozga, J. (2009). Governing education through data in England: From regulation to self-evaluation. Journal of Education Policy, 24(2), 149–162. doi:10.1080/02680930902733121
  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. (A. Goldhammer, Trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rutkowski, D. (2007). Converging us softly: How intergovernmental organisations promote neoliberal educational policy. Critical Studies in Education, 48, 229–247. doi:10.1080/17508480701494259
  • Rutkowski, D. (2015). The OECD and the local: PISA-based test for schools in the US. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(5), 683–699.
  • Rutkowski, L., & Rutkowski, D. (2015, March 8–13). The OECD's leaning tower: A call for a more measured approach to using and interpreting PISA results. Paper presented to CIES Conference, Washington, DC.
  • Sassen, S. (2006). Territory, authority, rights: From medieval to global assemblages. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Sassen, S. (2007). Theoretical and empirical elements in the study of globalisation. In I. Rossi (Ed.), Frontiers of globalisation research: Theoretical and methodological approaches (pp. 287–305). New York: Springer.
  • Savage, M., & Burrows, R. (2007). The coming crisis of empirical sociology. Sociology, 41, 885–899. doi:10.1177/0038038507080443
  • Schriewer, J. (1990). The method of comparison and the need for externalisation: Methodological criteria and sociological concepts. In J. Schriewer & B. Holmes (Eds.), Theories and methods in comparative education (2 ed., pp. 25–83). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
  • Schriewer, J., & Martinez, C. (2004). Constructions of internationality in education. In G. Steiner-Khamsi (Ed.), The global politics of educational borrowing and lending (pp. 29–53). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Sellar, S. (2015). Data infrastructure: A review of expanding accountability systems and large-scale assessments in education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(5), 765–777.
  • Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2013). Looking East: Shanghai, PISA 2009 and the reconstitution of reference societies in the global education policy field. Comparative Education, 49, 464–485. doi:10.1080/03050068.2013.770943
  • Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2014). The OECD and the expansion of PISA: New global modes of governance in education. British Educational Research Journal, 40, 917–936. doi:10.1002/berj.3120
  • Shahjahan, R., Morgan, C., & Nguyen, D. (2015). ‘Will I learn what I want to learn?’ Usable representations, ‘students’ and OECD assessment production. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(5), 700–711.
  • Simons, M. (2015). Governing education without reform: The power of the example. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(5), 712–731.
  • Takayama, K. (2010). Politics of externalisation in reflexive times: Reinventing Japanese educational reform discourse through ‘Finnish PISA success’. Comparative Education Review, 54(1), 51–75. doi:10.1086/644838
  • Thompson, G., & Cook, I. (2012). Spinning in the NAPLAN ether: ‘Postscript on the control societies’ and the seduction of education in Australia. Deleuze Studies, 6, 564–584. doi:10.3366/dls.2012.0083
  • Thompson, G., & Cook, I. (2015). Becoming-topologies of education: Deformations, networks and the database effect. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(5), 732–748.
  • Thrift, N. (1999). Steps to an ecology of place. In D. Massey, J. Allen, & P. Sarre (Eds.), Human geography today (pp. 295–321). Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Thrift, N. (2005). Knowing capitalism. London: Sage.
  • Tröhler, D. (2015). The medicalisation of current educational research and its effects on education policy and school reforms. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(5), 749–764.
  • Tucker, M. S. (Ed.). (2011). Surpassing Shanghai: An agenda for American education built on the worlds leading systems. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.
  • Wagner, P. (2012). Modernity: Understanding the present. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Wiseman, A. (2010). The uses of evidence for educational policymaking: Global contexts and international trends. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 1–24. doi:10.3102/0091732x09350472

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.