My tongue on your theory: the bittersweet reminder of every-thing unnameable

References

• Ainsworth, M. D. S., & Bowlby, J. (1991). An ethological approach to personality development. American Psychologist, 46(4), 331–341. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.46.4.333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atwood, M. (2003). Oryx and crake. Berkeley, CA: Seal.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1961). Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models’. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(3), 575–582. doi: 10.1037/h0045925
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society (Spring), 23, 801–831. doi: 10.1086/345321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2012). On touching – The inhuman that therefore I am. Differences, 23(3), 206–223. doi: 10.1215/10407391-1892943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bataille, G. (1930). La Bouche. [The mouth.] Retrieved September 2014, from http://dmtlsmerz2.wordpress.com/2007/12/23/la-bouche-the-mouth-by-george-bataille-abattoir-angel/.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, G. (1972) A theory of play and fantasy. In Author? Steps to an ecology of mind (pp. 177–193). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berns, U. (2013). Artificial life, science and reflexivity in James Whale's Frankenstein. In R. Haekel & S. Blackmore (Eds.), Discovering the human: Life, science and the arts in the eighteenth and early twentieth centuries (pp. 187–204). Gottingen: Deutsche Nationalbibliothek.
   Google Scholar
• Bhabha, H. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2008). In spite of the times: The postsecular turn in feminism. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(6), 1–24. doi: 10.1177/0263276408095542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of Identity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. (1990). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (Ed.). (1996). Monster theory: Reading culture. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1985). Cinéma 2: L'image-temps. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1990). The logic of sense. (M. Lester, Trans.). London: Athlone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition. (P. Patton, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1977). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. (R. Hurley, M. Seem, & H. Lane, Trans.). New York, NY: Penguin Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? (H. Tomlinson, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. (1997). Of grammatology. London: The John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone, M. (2000). Body modification. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan, T. (2004). Deleuze and politics: Some problems and possibilities. Unpublished paper presented at the 2nd Pavia graduate conference in political philosophy. Retrieved July 27, 2014 from http://cfs.unipv.it/seminari/flanagan.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1899/2003). The uncanny (D. McLintock, Trans.). London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Gigante, D. (2000). Facing the ugly: the case of ‘Frankenstein’. In ELH (see https://www.press.jhu.edu/journals/english_literary_history/), 67(2), 565–587.
   Google Scholar
• Golding, F. (2012). Ana-materialism and the Pineal Eye (becoming ‘mouth-breast’). In P. Baler (Ed.), The next thing: Art in the 21st century (pp. 105–120). New York, NY: Little and Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, K. (Ed.). (2002). Monstrous manifestations. Oxford: Inter-Disciplinary Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. London: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. (2008). Chaos, territory, art: Deleuze and the framing of the earth. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guattari, F. (1995). Chaosmosis: An ethico aesthetic paradigm. (P. Bains & J. Pefanis, Trans.). Sydney: Power Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Halberstam, J. (1995). Skin shows: Gothic horror and the technology of monsters. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (1989). Cultural identity and cinematic representation. Framework, 36, 68–81.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. doi: 10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1992). The promises of monster: A regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural Studies (pp. 295–337). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (2003). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people and significant otherness. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm.
   Google Scholar
• Harlow, H. (1958). The nature of love. American Psychologist, 13, 673–685. doi: 10.1037/h0047884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higher Education Funding Council. (2008). Research assessment exercise. Retrieved July 27, 2015 from http://www.rae.ac.uk
   Google Scholar
• Higher Education Funding Council for England. (2014). Research excellence framework. Retrieved July 27, 2015 from http://www.ref.ac.uk
   Google Scholar
• Jones, L., & Stewart, S. (1994). Her tongue on my theory: Images, essays and fantasies. Vancouver: Press Gang Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, P. H. (2003). The development of environmental moral identity. In S. Clayton (Ed.), Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature (pp. 113–134). London: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H. (2007). The parched tongue. Retrieved January 29, 2015 from https://www.academia.edu/6320758/The_Parched_Tongue
   Google Scholar
• Ku, C. H. (2006). Of monster and man: Transgenics and transgression in Margaret Atwood's Oryx and Crake. Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies, 32(1), 107–133.
   Google Scholar
• LeDuff, C. (2003). At a slaughterhouse, some things never die. In C. Wolfe (Ed.), Zoontologies: The question of the animal (pp. 183–197). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, K. (1970). Studies in animal and human behaviour, Vol. 1. (R. Martin, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lovecraft, H. P. (1985). Through the gates of the silver key. In H. P. Lovecraft (Ed.), Omnibus 1: At the mountains of madness (pp. 503–552). London: Grafton Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lyotard, J. F. (1979). The postmodern condition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. (2011). Qualitative inquiry: Where are the ruins? Qualitative Inquiry, 17(10), 997–1005. doi: 10.1177/1077800411423198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, B. R. (2011). The research excellence framework and the ‘impact agenda’: Are we creating a Frankenstein monster? Research Evaluation, 20(3), 247–254. doi: 10.3152/095820211X13118583635693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (2014). What animals teach us about politics. London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moretti, F. (1983). Dialectic of fear. In F. Moretti (Ed.), Signs taken for wonders: On the sociology of literary forms (pp. 83–108). ( S. Fischer, D. Forgacs, & D. Miller, Trans.). London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6–18. doi: 10.1093/screen/16.3.6
   Google Scholar
• O'Hara, D. T. (2003). Neither gods nor monsters: An untimely critique of the ‘post/human’ imagination. Boundary 2, 30(3), 107–122. doi: 10.1215/01903659-30-3-107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. (1991). Objectivity, relativism, and truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• REF. (2014). Research Excellence Framework. Retrieved September, 2, from, http://www.ref.ac.uk.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, M. (1991). Race and the dominant gaze: Narratives of law and inequality in popular film. Legal Studies Forum, 15(3), 243–255.
   Google Scholar
• Semetsky, I. (2003). Deleuze's new image of thought, or Dewey revisited. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 35(1), 17–29. doi: 10.1111/1469-5812.00003
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, C. (2013). Research that doesn't belong to single subject area is deemed ‘too risky’. The Guardian. Retrieved July 2014 from http://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/blog/2013/nov/21/interdisciplinary-research-ref-submission-university.
   Google Scholar
• Shelley, M. W. (2008/1818). Frankenstein; or, the modern Prometheus. Oxford: Oxford Paperbacks.
   Google Scholar
• Shildrick, M. (1996). Posthumanism and the monstrous body. Body and Society, 2(1), 1–15. doi: 10.1177/1357034X96002001001
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sofoulis, Z. (1988). Through the lumen: Frankenstein and the optics of re-origination (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of California, Santa Cruz.
   Google Scholar
• Somers-Hall, H. (2007). The politics of creation. Pli, 18, 221–236.
   Google Scholar
• Stange, M. (2010). ‘You must create a female’: Republican order and its natural base in Frankenstein. Women's Studies: An Inter-disciplinary Journal, 29(3), 309–331. doi: 10.1080/00497878.2000.9979316
   Google Scholar
• Stiegler, B. (1994). Technics and time: The fault of Epimetheus, No. 1. (R. Beardsworth & G. Collins, Trans.). California: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stryker, S. (2006). My words to Victor Frankenstein above the Village of Chamounix: Performing transgender rage. In S. Stryker & S. Whittle (Eds.), The transgender studies reader (pp. 244–256). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, L. (2010). When species kiss: Some recent correspondence between animots. Animalia, 2(1), 68–75.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Belt, H. (2009). Playing God in Frankenstein's footsteps: Synthetic biology and the meaning of life. Nanoethics, 3(3), 257–268. doi: 10.1007/s11569-009-0079-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Webster, F. (2000). The politics of sex and gender: Benhabib and Butler debate subjectivity. Hypatia, 15(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2000.tb01077.x
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, C. (2010). What is posthumanism? Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. (2007). Risks and pleasures: A Deleuzo-Guattarian pedagogy of desire in education. British Educational Research Journal, 33(3), 331–347. doi: 10.1080/01411920701243602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar