The significance of conflicting discourses in a professional degree: assessment in undergraduate fine art practice

References

• Atkinson, D. (2006). Assessment in educational practice: Forming pedagogised identities in the art curriculum. In T. Hardy (Ed.), Art education in a postmodern world: Collected essays (pp. 147–157). Bristol: Intellect Books.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, T., & Claxton, G. (2000). The intuitive practitioner: On the value of not always knowing what one is doing. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belluigi, D. Z. (2008). Excavating the ‘critique’: An investigation into disjunctions between the espoused and the practiced within a Fine Art studio practice curriculum (Master's thesis). Rhodes University.
   Google Scholar
• Belluigi, D. Z. (2013). A proposed schema for the conditions of creativity in fine art studio practice. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 14(19), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Belluigi, D. Z. (2014). The paradox of ‘teaching’ transformation in fine art studio practice: Assessment in the South African context. International Journal of Education through Art, 10(3), 349–362. doi: 10.1386/eta.10.3.349_1
   Google Scholar
• Belluigi, D. Z. (2015). The problem of authorship: Considering the significance of interpretative approaches on the conditions for creativity in undergraduate fine art studio practice (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Kingston University.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Billet, S. (2006). Relational interdependence between social and individual agency in work and working life. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 13(1), 53–69. doi: 10.1207/s15327884mca1301_5
   Google Scholar
• Blair, B. (2007). At the end of a huge crit in the summer, it was ‘crap’. I'd worked really hard but all she said was ‘fine’ and I was gutted. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 5(2), 83–95. doi: 10.1386/adch.5.2.83_1
   Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., & West, A. (2007). Learning to write in higher education: Students’ perceptions of an intervention in developing understanding of assessment criteria. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(1), 77–89. doi: 10.1080/13562510601102180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, S. (1995). Authorship: From Plato to the postmodern – A reader. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cowdroy, R., & de Graaff, E. (2005). Assessing highly-creative ability. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(5), 507–518. doi: 10.1080/02602930500187113
   Google Scholar
• Dallow, P. (2003). Representing creativeness: Practice-based approaches to research in creative arts. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 2(1/2), 49–66. doi: 10.1386/adch.2.1.49/0
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B., & Hare, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive construction of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delandshere, G. (2001). Implicit theories, unexamined assumptions and the status quo of educational assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 8(2), 113–133. doi: 10.1080/09695940123828
   Google Scholar
• Dineen, R., & Collins, E. (2005). Killing the goose: Conflicts between pedagogy and politics in the delivery of a creative education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 24(1), 43–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-8070.2005.00422.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecclestone, K. (2001). ‘I know a 2:1 when I see it’: Understanding criteria for degree classifications in franchised university programmes. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 25(3), 301–313. doi: 10.1080/03098770126527
   Google Scholar
• Elkins, J. (2001). Why art cannot be taught: A handbook for art students. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N., & Boud, D. (2007). Assessment and emotion. The impact of being assessed. In D. Boud, & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education learning for the longer term (pp. 144–155). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. (A.M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (C. Gordon, Ed.). Brighton: Harvester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fish, S. E. (1980). Is there a text in this class: The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gooding-Brown, J. (2000). Conversations about art: A disruptive model of interpretation. Studies in Art Education, 42(1), 36–50. doi: 10.2307/1320751
   Google Scholar
• Gray, P. (2002). The roots of assessment: Tensions, solutions, and research directions. In R. W. Banta (Ed.), Building a scholarship of assessment (pp. 49–66). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Habib, R. (2005). A history of literary criticism: From Plato to the present. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, T. (2006). Introduction: Nailing jelly – Art education in a postmodern world. In R. Hardy (Ed.), Art education in a postmodern world: Collected essays (pp. 7–15). Bristol: Intellect Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hendry, G. D., Armstrong, S., & Bromberger, N. (2012). Implementing standards-based assessment effectively: Incorporating discussion of exemplars into classroom teaching. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(2), 149–161. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2010.515014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussey, T., & Smith, P. (2002). The trouble with learning outcomes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 3(3), 220–233. doi: 10.1177/1469787402003003003
   Google Scholar
• Mann, S. (2000). The student's experience of reading. Higher Education, 39(3), 297–317. doi: 10.1023/A:1003953002704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, S. (2001). Alternative perspectives on the student experience: Alienation and engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 26(1), 8–19. doi: 10.1080/03075070020030689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meistre, B., & Belluigi, D. Z. (2010). After image: Using metaphoric storytelling. In C. Nygaard, N. Courtney, & C. Holtham (Eds.), Teaching creativity – Creativity in teaching (pp. 155–171). Oxfordshire: Libri Press.
   Google Scholar
• Melles, G. (2008). Producing fact, affect and identity in architecture critiques – A discourse analysis of student and faculty discourse interaction. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 6(3), 159–171. doi: 10.1386/adch.6.3.159_1
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. E. (1996). Institutions, individuals and talk: The construction of identity in fine art. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 15(2), 143–154. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-8070.1996.tb00661.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, C. J. (2011). In the eye of the beholder? An investigation of student assessment in the creative arts in universities (Unpublished PhD thesis). Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, R., & Espeland, M. (2007). Making connections in assessment and evaluation in arts education. In L. Bresler (Ed.), International handbook of research in arts education (pp. 337–340). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ochsner, J. K. (2000). Behind the mask: A psychoanalytic perspective on interaction in the design studio. Journal of Architectural Education, 53(4), 194–206. doi: 10.1162/104648800564608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr, S. (2010). ‘We kind of try to merge our own experience with the objectivity of the criteria’: The role of connoisseurship and tacit practice in undergraduate fine art assessment. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 9(1), 5–19. doi: 10.1386/adch.9.1.5_1
   Google Scholar
• Orr, S. (2011). ‘Being an artist you kind of, I mean, you get used to excellence’: Identity, values and Fine Art assessment practices. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 30(1), 37–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-8070.2011.01672.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr, S., & Bloxham, S. (2012). Making judgements about students making work: Lecturers’ assessment practices in art and design. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 12(2–3), 234–253. doi: 10.1177/1474022212467605
   Google Scholar
• Preziosi, D. (1989). Rethinking art history: Meditations on a coy science. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz, P. (1989). Whirl without end: Audience-oriented criticism. In G. D. Atkins & L. Morrow (Eds.), Contemporary literary theory (pp. 81–100). Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riveros, A., & Viczko, M. (2015). The enactment of professional learning policies: Performativity and multiple ontologies. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(4), 533–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144. doi: 10.1007/BF00117714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambell, K., & McDowell, L. (1998). The construction of the hidden curriculum: Messages and meanings in the assessment of student learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(4), 391–402. doi: 10.1080/0260293980230406
   Google Scholar
• Sartre, J.-P. (1962). La nausee. (L. Alexander, Trans.) London: Hamish Hamilton.
   Google Scholar
• Shay, S.-E. (2005). The assessment of complex tasks: A double reading. Studies in Higher Education, 30(6), 663–679. doi: 10.1080/03075070500339988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart, J., & Dixon, S. (2002). The discourse of assessment: Language and value in the assessment of group practice in the performing arts. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 1(2), 185–204. doi: 10.1177/1474022202001002005
   Google Scholar
• Usher, R., & Johnston, R. (1997). Reconfiguring the other. Self and experience in adult education. In R. Usher, I. Bryant, & R. Johnston (Eds.), Adult education and the postmodern challenge. Learning beyond the limits (pp. 94–121). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, H. (2006). Power, freedom and resistance: Excavating the design jury. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 25(3), 286–296. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-8070.2006.00495.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. (1971). Playing and reality. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar