Blaming the victim: assessment, examinations, and the responsibilisation of students and teachers in neo-liberal governance

References

• Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (ATCS). (2010). Draft white paper 1: Defining 21st century skills. Retrieved July, 28, 2014, from http://atc21s.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/1-Defining-21st-Century-Skills.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Broadfoot, P. (1979). Assessment, schools and society. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Broadfoot, P. (Ed.) (1984). Selection, certification and control. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broadfoot, P. (1996). Education, assessment and society. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broadfoot, P., Nuttall, D., James, M., & Stierer, B. (1988). Records of achievement. London: Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P., & Lauder, H. (1992). Education for economic survival. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butterfield, S. (1995). Educational objectives and national assessment. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cassen, R., & Kingdon, G. (2007). Tackling low educational achievement. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Common Core Standards (CCS). (2015). Retrieved June 22, 2015, from http://www.corestandards.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlstedt, M., & Fejes, A. (2013). Family makeover: Coaching, confession and parental responsibilisation. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, iFirst2013.
   Google Scholar
• Dearing, R. (1993). The national curriculum and its assessment: Final Report. London: School Curriculum and Assessment Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Science (DES). (1987). Task group on assessment and testing: A report. London: DES.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education (DfE). (2015). The national curriculum. Retrieved June 22, 2015, from https://www.gov.uk/national-curriculum/overview.
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, P. (1993). Post-capitalist society. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Filer, A. (Ed.) (2000). Assessment: Social process and social product. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, T. (2006). The world is flat. New York, NY: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L., Stecher, B., Marsh, J., McCombs, J., Robyn, A., Russell, J., Naftel, S., & Barney, H. (2007). Standards-based accountability under No Child Left Behind. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, G., & McNicholl, J. (2007). Modular mayhem? A case study of the development of the A-level science curriculum in England. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(3), 335–351. doi: 10.1080/09695940701591966
   Google Scholar
• Hopson, R. (2009). Reclaiming knowledge at the margins: Culturally responsive evaluation in the current evaluation moment. In K. Ryan & B. Cousins (Eds.), International handbook on evaluation (pp. 429–447). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hopson, R. K., Kirkhart, K. E., & Bledsoe, K. L. (2012). Decolonizing evaluation in a developing world: Implications and cautions for equity-focused evaluations. In M. Segone (Ed.), Evaluation for equitable development results (pp. 59–82). New York: UNICEF.
   Google Scholar
• Inner London Education Authority (ILEA). (1984). Improving secondary schools (The Hargreaves Report). London: ILEA.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, P. (2001). Youth at risk: Processes of individualisation and responsibilisation in the risk society. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 22(1), 23–33.
   Google Scholar
• Koretz, D. (1998). Large-scale portfolio assessments in the US: Evidence pertaining to the quality of measurement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(3), 309–334. doi: 10.1080/0969595980050302
   Google Scholar
• Lauder, H., Brown, P., Dillabough, J-A., & Halsey, A. H. (Eds.) (2006). Education, globalisation and social change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lauder, H., Brown, P., & Tholen, G. (2012). The global auction model, skill bias theory and graduate incomes. In H. Lauder, M. Young, H. Daniels, M. Balarin, & J. Lowe (Eds.), Educating for the knowledge economy? Critical perspectives (pp. 43–65). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, T. (1999). The critique of political economy of organisation as a genealogy of power. International Journal of Political Economy, 29(3), 55–75. doi: 10.1080/08911916.1999.11643995
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, T. (2001). The birth of bio-politics: Michel Foucault's lecture at the college de France on neo-liberal governmentality. Economy and Society, 30(2), 190–207. doi: 10.1080/03085140120042271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, T. (2012). Foucault, governmentality and critique. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
   Google Scholar
• Liebenberg, L., Ungar, M., & Ikeda, J. (2013). Neo-liberalism and responsibilisation in the discourse of social services workers. British Journal of Social Work, iFirst 2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindley, J., & Machin, S. (2012). The quest for more and more education: Implications for social mobility. Fiscal Studies, 33(2), 265–286. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5890.2012.00161.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, R., & Torrance, H. (1988). The changing face of educational assessment. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Qualification Authority (NZQA). (2011). History of NCE. Retrieved July 28, 2014, from http://www.nzqa.govt.nz/qualifications-standards/qualifications/ncea/understanding-ncea/history-of-ncea/.
   Google Scholar
• No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). (2001). Public Law 107–110. Retrieved July 28, 2014, from http://www.ed.gov/nclb/landing.jhtml.
   Google Scholar
• Obama, B. (2009). The race to the top. Retrieved July 24, 2014, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/fact-sheet-race-top.
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, P., Osbaldiston, N. M., & Kendall, G. (2014). ePortfolios and eGovernment: From technology to entrepreneurial self. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(3), 284–295. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00826.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeters, R. (2013). Responsibilisation on government's terms: New welfare and the governance of responsibility and solidarity. Social Policy and Society, 12(4), 583–595. doi: 10.1017/S1474746413000018
   Google Scholar
• Perry, E., & Francis, B. (2010). The social class gap for educational achievement: A review of the literature. Retrieved July 26, 2014, from http://www.thersa.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/367003/RSA-Social-Justice-paper.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pole, C. (1993). Assessing and recording achievement. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M., Bransford, J., Kozma, R., & Quellmalz, E. (2012). New assessments and environments for knowledge building. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and learning of 21st century skills (pp. 231–300). Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
   Google Scholar
• Stiegler, B. (2003). Our ailing educational institutions. Culture Machine, 5. Retrieved January 19, 2015, from http://www.culturemachine.net/index.php/cm/article/viewArticle/258/243.
   Google Scholar
• Stiegler, B. (2015). Biopower, psychopower and the logic of the scapegoat. Ars Industrialis. Retrieved January 19, 2015, from http://www.arsindustrialis.org/node/2924.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, G. (1984). Ability, merit and measurement: Mental testing and English education 1880–1940. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sykes Review. (2010). The Sir Richard sykes review of the future of English qualifications and assessment system. Retrieved July 28, 2014, from http://www.conservatives.com/~/media/files/downloadable%20files/sir%20richard%20sykes_review.ashx?dl=true.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, H. (1995). Evaluating authentic assessment: Issues, problems and future possibilities. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, H. (2007). Assessment as learning? How the use of explicit learning objectives, assessment criteria and feedback in post-secondary education and training can come to dominate learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(3), 281–294. doi: 10.1080/09695940701591867
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, H. (2011). Using assessment to drive the reform of schooling: Time to stop pursuing the chimera? British Journal of Educational Studies, 59(4), 459–485. doi: 10.1080/00071005.2011.620944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance, H. (2012). Formative assessment at the crossroads: Conformative, deformative and transformative assessment. Oxford Review of Education, 38(3), 323–342. doi: 10.1080/03054985.2012.689693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyatt-Smith, C., Klenowski, V., & Gunn, S. (2010). The centrality of teachers’ judgment practice in assessment: A study of standards in moderation. Assessment in Education: Principles, policy & practice, 17(1), 59–75. doi: 10.1080/09695940903565610
   Google Scholar