Producing calculable worlds: education at a glance

References

• Berg, M., & Timmermans, S. (2000). Orders and their others: On the constitution of universalities in medical work. Configurations, 8(1), 31–61. doi:10.1353/con.2000.0001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank, R. K. (1993). Developing a system of education indicators: Selecting, implementing, and reporting indicators. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(1), 65–80. doi:10.3102/01623737015001065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottani, N. (1994). The OECD international education indicators. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 1, 333–350.
   Google Scholar
• Bottani, N. (1996). OECD international education indicators. International Journal of Educational Research, 25, 279–288. doi:10.1016/0883-0355(96)82857-6
   Google Scholar
• Bottani, N. (1998). The OECD educational indicators: Purposes, limits and production processes. Prospects, 28(1), 61–75. doi:10.1007/BF02737780
   Google Scholar
• Bottani, N. (2008). The oil level, the engine and the car: The stakes invovled in assessing the quality of education on the basis of indicators. Éducation et Société, 18(2), 11–23.
   Google Scholar
• Bottani, N., & Walberg, H. J. (1992). Introduction: What are the international education indicators for? In Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (Ed.), The OECD international education indicators – A framework for analysis (pp. 7–12). Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out – Classification and its consequences. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: The domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? London and Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Cullather, N. (2007). The foreign policy of the calorie. The American Historical Review, 112, 337–364. doi:10.1086/ahr.112.2.337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derksen, L. (2000). Towards a sociology of measurement: The meaning of measurement error in the case of DNA profiling. Social Studies of Science, 30, 803–845. doi:10.1177/030631200030006001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desrosières, A. (1998). The politics of large numbers – A history of statistical reasoning (C. Naish, Trans.). Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elley, W. B. (1992). How in the world do students read? IEA study of reading literacy. Hamburg: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
   Google Scholar
• Gorur, R. (2011). ANT on the PISA trail: Following the statistical pursuit of certainty. Educational Philosophy & Theory, 43(5–6), 76–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorur, R. (2014). Towards a sociology of measurement technologies in education policy. European Educational Research Journal, 13(1), 58–72. doi:10.2304/eerj.2014.13.1.58
   Google Scholar
• Heyneman, S. P. (1999). The sad story of UNESCO's education statistics. International Journal of Educational Development, 19(1), 65–74. doi:10.1016/S0738-0593(98)00068-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, R. M. (1978). About educational indicators: Statistics on the conditions and trends in education. Review of Research in Education, 6, 276–315. doi:10.3102/0091732X006001276
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (2004). The idiom of co-production. In S. Jasanoff (Ed.), States of knowledge: The co-production of science and the social order (pp. 1–12). London and New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Knorr Cetina, K. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford: Perammon.
   Google Scholar
• Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life – The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (1994). Organising modernity. Oxford, UK and Cambridge. MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2007, May 18). Actor network theory and material semiotics, version of 25 April 2007. Retrieved from http://www.heterogeneities.net/publications/Law-ANTandMaterialSemiotics.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2009a). Actor network theory and material semiotics. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), The new Blackwell companion to social theory (pp. 141–158). Oxford: Blackwell-Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2009b). Seeing like a survey. Cultural Sociology, 3, 239–256. doi:10.1177/1749975509105533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainguet, C., & Baye, A. (2006, March). Defining a framework of indicators to measure the social outcomes of learning. Paper presented at the Measuring the Effects of Education and Civic Engagement: Proceedings of The Copenhagen Symposium. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/innovation-education/37425733.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. (2002). Rule of experts: Egypt, techo-politics, modernity. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Oakes, J. (1986). Educational indicators: A guide for policymakers (p. 39). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (1995). Measuring what students learn. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2011). Education at a glance 2011: OECD indicators (p. 497). Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2012). Education at a glance 2012: OECD Indicators (p. 567). Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, T. (1995). Trust in numbers – The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, NY and Chichester: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sauvageot, C. (1997). Indicators for educational planning: A practical guide. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning.
   Google Scholar
• Sauvageot, C. (2008). A tool for international comparison: The international standard classification of education [ISCED]. In A. Charras & C. Sauvageot (Eds.), Education & formations: International comparisons (pp. 211–221). Paris, France: Ministry of National Education; Ministry of Higher Education and Research Evaluation, Forecasting and Performance Directorate.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How some schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Binghampton, NY: Vail-Ballou Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, T. M., & Baker, D. P. (2001). Worldwide growth and institutionalization of statistical indicators for education policy-making. Peabody Journal of Education, 76(3–4), 141–152.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, J. A. (2008). The origins of the international standard classification of education. Peabody Journal of Education, 83, 5–40.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. (2004). Remembering the technological unconscious by foregrounding knowledges of position. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 22, 175–190. doi:10.1068/d321t
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walberg, H. J., & Zhang, G. (1998). Analyzing the OECD indicators model. Comparative Education, 34(1), 55–70. doi:10.1080/03050069828342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolgar, S. (1991a). Beyond the citation debate: Towards a sociology of measurement technologies and their use in science policy. Science and Public Policy, 18, 319–326.
   Google Scholar
• Woolgar, S. (1991b). Configuring the user: The case of usability trials. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology, and domination (pp. 57–99). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar