Policy critics and policy survivors: who are they and how do they contribute to a department policy role typology?

References

• ACME (Advisory Committee on Mathematics Education). (2011). Mathematical needs: The Mathematical needs of learners. Retrieved August 7, 2013, from http://www.acme-uk.org/media/7627/acme_theme_b_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (1993). What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 13(2), 10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Educational Policy, 18(2), 215–228. doi: 10.1080/0268093022000043065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., Braun, A., & Hoskins, K. (2011a). Policy actors: Doing policy work in schools. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(4), 625–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., Braun, A., & Hoskins, K. (2011b). Policy subjects and policy actors in schools: Some necessary but insufficient analyses. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(4), 611–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barthes, R. (1974). S/Z translated by Richard Miller. New York, NY: Hilland Wang. (Original French version published by Editions du Seuil, Paris, 1970).
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, B., & Simmt, E. (2003). Understanding learning systems: Mathematics education and complexity science. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(2), 137–167. doi: 10.2307/30034903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2008). Complexity as a theory of education. Transnational Curriculum Inquiry, 5(2), 33–44. Retrieved from http://nitinat.library.ubc.ca/ojs/index.php/tci
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2014). Resilient teachers, resilient schools: Building and sustaining quality in testing times Routledge. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2005). Activity theory and expansive design. Retrieved June 8, 2014, from http://projectsfinal.interactionivrea.org/2004-2005/SYMPOSIUM202005/communication20material/ACTIVITY20THEORY20AND20EXPANSIVE20DESIGN_Engestrom.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eurydice. (2011). Mathematics education in Europe: Common challenges and national policies. Brussels: EACEA (Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency), European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgen, J. (2011). Knowing and identity: A situated theory of mathematics knowledge in teaching. In T. Rowland & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Mathematical Knowledge in Teaching (pp. 27–42). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Leatham, K. R. (2006). Viewing Mathematics teachers’ beliefs as sensible systems. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(1), 91–102. doi: 10.1007/s10857-006-9006-8
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualisation. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 575–596). New York, NY: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Millett, A., Brown, M., & Askew, M. (2004). Primary mathematics and the developing professional: Multiple perspectives on attainment in numeracy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C. J. (1984). Typicality and the case study. In R. F. Ellen (Ed.), Ethnographic research: A guide to general conduct (pp. 238–241). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills (Ofsted). (2008). Mathematics: Understanding the score. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted. (2012). Mathematics: Made to measure. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Perryman, J., Ball, S. J., & Maguire, M. (2011). Life in the pressure cooker: School league tables and English and mathematics teachers’ responses to accountability in a results-driven era. British Journal of Educational Studies, 59(2), 179–195. doi: 10.1080/00071005.2011.578568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prediger, S., Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., & Arzarello, F. (2008). Networking strategies and methods for connecting theoretical approaches: First steps towards a conceptual framework. Zdm, 40(2), 165–178. doi: 10.1007/s11858-008-0086-z
   Google Scholar
• Siskin, L. S. (1994). Realms of knowledge: Academic departments in secondary schools. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P. (2004). Standards deviation: How schools misunderstand educational policy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431. doi: 10.3102/00346543072003387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supovitz, J., & Weinbaum, E. H. (2008). The implementation gap: Understanding reforms in high schools. New York, NY: Teachers’ College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, A., & de Geest, E. (2014). Department-initiated change. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87(3), 351–368. doi: 10.1007/s10649-014-9549-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar