Strengthening discipline in state schools: constructions of discipline in a public policy moment

References

• Barrett, B., & Bound, A. M. (2015). A critical discourse analysis of no promo homo policies in US schools. Educational Studies, 51(4), 267–283. doi: 10.1080/00131946.2015.1052445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broomhead, K. (2013). Blame, guilt and the need for ‘labels’: Insights from parents of children with special educational needs and educational practitioners. British Journal of Special Education, 40(1), 14–21. doi: 10.1111/1467-8578.12012
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. L. (2010). Teachers in the news: A critical analysis of one US newspaper’s discourse on education, 2006–2007. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(1), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300903465450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cranston, N., & Ehrich, L. C. (2002). ‘Overcoming sleeplessness’: Role and workload of secondary school principals in Queensland. Leading & Managing, 8(1), 17–35.
   Google Scholar
• Dempster, N., Carter, L., Freakley, M., & Parry, L. (2004). Contextual influences on school leaders in Australia: Some data from a recent study of principals’ ethical decision-making. School Leadership & Management, 24(2), 163–174. doi: 10.1080/1363243041000695804
   Google Scholar
• Education and Innovation Committee. (2013). Education (strengthening discipline in state schools) Amendment Bill 2013 (Parliamentary Committees No. 24). Brisbane: Queensland Government.
   Google Scholar
• Findlay, N. M. (2015). Discretion in student discipline: Insight into elementary principals’ decision making. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(3), 472–507. doi: 10.1177/0013161X14523617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsey, M. (2009). The problem with autonomy: An ethnographic study of neoliberalism in practice at an Australian high school. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 30(4), 457–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frick, W. C. (2009). Principals’ value-informed decision making, intrapersonal moral discord, and pathways to resolution: The complexities of moral leadership praxis. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(1), 50–74.
   Google Scholar
• Gobby, B. (2013). Principal self-government and subjectification: The exercise of principal autonomy in the Western Australian Independent Public Schools programme. Critical Studies in Education, 54(3), 273–285. doi: 10.1080/17508487.2013.832338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemphill, S. A., Herrenkohl, T. I., Plenty, S. M., Toumbourou, J. W., Catalano, R. F., & McMorris, B. J. (2012). Pathways from school suspension to adolescent nonviolent antisocial behaviour in students in Victoria, Australia, and Washington State, United States: Pathways from school suspension to antisocial behaviour. Journal of Community Psychology, 40(3), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupchik, A., & Ellis, N. (2007). School discipline and security: Fair for all students? Youth & Society, 39(4), 549–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X07301956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lott, B. (2001). Low-income parents and the public schools. Journal of Social Issues, 57(2), 247–259. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magor-Blatch, L. (2011). Beyond zero tolerance: Providing a framework to promote social justice and healthy adolescent development. The Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 28(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1375/aedp.28.1.61
   Google Scholar
• Martin, N., & Macpherson, R. (2015). The politics of the local schools local decisions policy in a New South Wales Public School: Implications for principals and the state. Leading & Managing, 21(1), 36–52.
   Google Scholar
• Queensland Government. (2013a, June). Great teachers = great results: A direct action plan for Queensland schools. Brisbane: Queensland Government.
   Google Scholar
• Queensland Parliament. (2013b). Education (strengthening discipline in State schools) Amendment Bill. In Queensland Parliamentary Debates (pp. 2599–2601). Brisbane: Queensland Government.
   Google Scholar
• Queensland Parliament. (2013c). Education (Strengthening discipline in State Schools) Amendment Bill. In Queensland Parliamentary Debates (pp. 3798–3818). Brisbane: Queensland Government.
   Google Scholar
• Schieble, M. (2012). A critical discourse analysis of teachers’ views on LGBT literature. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 33(2), 207–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwab, R. (2002). Indigenous school leavers: Failure, risk and high-stakes testing. Australian Aboriginal Studies, 1, 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. (2004). Researching educational policy and change in ‘new times’: Using critical discourse analysis. Journal of Education Policy, 19(4), 433–451. doi: 10.1080/0268093042000227483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, P. (2010). Headteacher autonomy: A sketch of a Bourdieuian field analysis of position and practice. Critical Studies in Education, 51(1), 5–20. doi: 10.1080/17508480903450190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse, context and cognition. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 159–177. doi: 10.1177/1461445606059565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent, C. G., Sprague, J. R., & Tobin, T. J. (2012). Exclusionary discipline practices across students’ racial/ethnic backgrounds and disability status: Findings. Education and Treatment of Children, 35(4), 585–601. doi: 10.1353/etc.2012.0025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2011). Complex texts: Analysing, understanding, explaining and interpreting meanings. Discourse Studies, 13(5), 623–633. doi: 10.1177/1461445611412745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar