Re/conceptualising time and temporality: an exploration of time in higher education

References

• Adam, B. (1990). Time and social theory. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Adam, B. (1995). Timewatch: The social analysis of time. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Adam, B. (1998). Timescapes of modernity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Adam, B. (2004). Time. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Polity: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity (Vol. 17). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, A., Hodges, B., Kavanagh, K., Fagan, S., Hartley, J., & Schofield, N. (2013). ‘Hard’ and ‘soft’ aspects of learning as investment: Opening up the neo-liberal view of a programme with ‘high’ levels of attrition. Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning, 14(3), 141–156. doi: 10.5456/WPLL.14.3.141
   Google Scholar
• Burke, P. J., Bennett, A., Burgess, C., & Gray, K. (2015). Capability, belonging and equity in higher education. Curtin University, Perth: National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.newcastle.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/243992/CAPABILITY-ONLINE.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Burke, P. J., Crozier, G., Francis, B., Read, B., Hall, J., & Peat, J. (2013). Formations of gender and higher education pedagogies. Final Report. York: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, P. J. (2007). Men accessing education: Masculinities, identifications and widening participation. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 28(4), 411–424. doi: 10.1080/01425690701369335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1997). The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Stanford California, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Canaan, J. E. (2013). Resisting the English neoliberalising university: What critical pedagogy can offer. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 11(2). Retrieved from http://www.jceps.com/archives/426
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S. (2010). Time future: The dominant discourse of higher education. Time & Society, 19(3), 345–364. doi: 10.1177/0961463X10381528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1990/1976). The history of sexuality, Volume I: An introduction. Translated by Robert Hurley. New York, NY: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1994). Le monde est un grand asile [The world is a great asylum]. In Dits et Ecrits [Says and Writes], Vol. II: 1976–1988 (p. 434). Paris: Gallimard. This passage translated by Clare O’Farrell.
   Google Scholar
• Gale, T., & Molla, T. (2015). Social justice intents in policy: An analysis of capability for and through education. Journal of Education Policy, 30(6), 810–830. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2014.987828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. (1996/1927). Being and time: A translation of Sein und Zeit. Translated by J. Stambaugh. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, B., Bedford, T., Hartley, J., Klinger, C., Murray, N., O’Rourke, J., & Schofield, N. (2013). Enabling retention: Processes and strategies for improving student retention in university-based enabling programs: Final report, 2013. Sydney: Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Horstmanshof, L., & Zimitat, C. (2007). Future time orientation predicts academic engagement among first-year university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 703–718. doi: 10.1348/000709906X160778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karabel, J. (2005). The chosen: The hidden history of admission and exclusion at Harvard, Yale and Princeton. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Lash, S. (2001). Technological forms of life. Theory, Culture & Society, 18(1), 105–120. doi: 10.1177/02632760122051661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lash, S., & Urry, J. (1994). Economies of signs and space. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Leathwood, C., & Hey, V. (2009). Gender/ed discourses and emotional sub-texts: Theorising emotion in UK higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(4), 429–440. doi: 10.1080/13562510903050194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D. (1999). Space-time, ‘science’ and the relationship between physical geography and human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 24(3), 261–276. doi: 10.1111/j.0020-2754.1999.00261.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, C., & Gale, T. (2009). Schooling in disadvantaged communities: Playing the game from the back of the field. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, A. (2004). The good teacher: Dominant discourses in teaching and teacher education. London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Morley, L., & Lugg, R. (2009). Mapping meritocracy: Intersecting gender, poverty and higher educational opportunity structures. Higher Education Policy, 22(1), 37–60. doi: 10.1057/hep.2008.26
   Google Scholar
• Southgate, E., & Bennett, A. (2014). Excavating widening participation policy in Australian higher education: Subject positions, representational effects, emotion. Creative Approaches to Research, 7(1), 21–45.
   Google Scholar
• Stables, A., & Semetsky, I. (2015). Edusemiotics: Semiotic philosophy as educational foundation. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, J., & Clegg, S. (2013). ‘My past is a double edge sword’: Temporality and reflexivity in mature learners. Studies in Continuing Education, 35(1), 17–29. doi: 10.1080/0158037X.2012.684794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, G., & Cook, I. (2014). Education policy-making and time. Journal of Education Policy, 29(5), 700–715. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2013.875225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virilio, P. (2000). Polar inertia (Trans. Patrick Camiller). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Woodman, D. (2011). Young people and the future: Multiple temporal orientations shaped in interaction with significant others. Young, 19(2), 111–128. doi: 10.1177/110330881001900201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar