New biological rationalities in education

References

• Baker, B. M. (2002). The hunt for disability: The new eugenics and the normalization of school children. The Teachers College Record, 104, 663–703. doi: 10.1111/1467-9620.00175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bivins, R. (2010). Alternative medicine? A history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broer, T., & Pickersgill, M. (2015). Targeting brains, producing responsibilities: The use of neuroscience within British social policy. Social Science & Medicine, 132, 54–61. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.03.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, N. (2012). The epigenetics revolution: How modern biology is rewriting our understanding of genetics, disease, and inheritance. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chitty, C. (2007). Eugenics, race and intelligence in education. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Coole, D., & Frost, S. (2010). Introducing the new materialisms. In D. Coole & S. Frost (Eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics (pp. 1–46). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (2003). Desert islands and other texts (1953–1974). New York, NY: Semiotext(e).
   Google Scholar
• Doidge, N. (2007). The brain that changes itself: Stories of personal triumph from the frontiers of brain science. Melbourne: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, S. (2016). Biocultural creatures: Towards a new theory of the human. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, W. (2003, December 4). The future is already here – it’s just not evenly distributed. The Economist. Retrieved from http://quoteinvestigator.com/2012/01/24/future-has-arrived/
   Google Scholar
• Gillborn, D. (2016). Softly, softly: Genetics, intelligence and the hidden racism of the new geneism. Journal of Education Policy, 31(4), 365–388. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2016.1139189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, T., & Palsson, G. (2013). Biosocial becomings: Integrating social and biological anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, B., & Guthman, J. (2015). Epigenetic life: Biological plasticity, abnormality, and new configurations of race and reproduction. Cultural Geographies, 22, 3–20. doi: 10.1177/1474474014555659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meloni, M. (2016). Political biology: Science and social values in human heredity from eugenics to epigenetics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Meloni, M. (2017). Race in an epigenetic time: Thinking biology in the plural. The British Journal of Sociology. doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F., Van Gog, T., & Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory: New conceptualizations, specifications, and integrated research perspectives. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 115–121. doi: 10.1007/s10648-010-9133-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, H. (2010). Is ‘the posthuman’ educable? On the convergence of educational philosophy, animal studies, and posthumanist theory. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31, 237–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poovey, M. (1998). A history of the modern fact: Problems of knowledge in the sciences of wealth and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pykett, J. (2016). Brain culture: Shaping policy through neuroscience. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinow, P. (1992). Artificiality and enlightenment: From sociobiology to biosociality. In J. Crary & S. Kwinter (Eds.), Incorporations (pp. 234–252). New York, NY: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, S. J., Bates, T. C., Der, G., Starr, J. M., & Deary, I. J. (2013). Education is associated with higher later life IQ scores, but not with faster cognitive processing speed. Psychology and Aging, 28, 515–521. doi: 10.1037/a0030820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, C. (2015). Puberty in crisis: The sociology of early sexual development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose. (2013). The human sciences in a biological age. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(1), 3–34. doi: 10.1177/0263276412456569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Said, E. (1983). The world, the text, and the critic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, J., & Colebrook, C. (2017). Introduction: Critical life studies and the problems of inhuman ties and posthumous life. In J. Weinstein & C. Colebrook (Eds.), Posthumous life: Theorizing beyond the posthuman (pp. 1–16). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Youdell, D. (2016). A biosocial education future? Research in Education, 96, 52–61. doi: 10.1177/0034523716664579
   Google Scholar
• Youdell, D. (2017). Bioscience and the sociology of education: The case for biosocial education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38, 1273–1287. doi: 10.1080/01425692.2016.1272406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar