The biosocial subject: sensor technologies and worldly sensibility

References

• Banaee, H., Ahmed, M. U., & Loutfi, A. (2013). Data mining for wearable sensors in health monitoring systems: A review of recent trends and challenges. Sensors, 13(12), 17472–17500. doi: 10.3390/s131217472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2017). When two hands touch, how close are they? On touching the inhuman that therefore I am. In K. Stakemeier & S. Witzgall (Eds.), Power of material/politics of materiality (pp. 153–165). Zurich: Diaphanes. Retrieved from http://www.diaphanes.de/titel/ontouching-the-inhumanthat-therefore-i-am-v1-1-3075. Originally published in Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 23(3), 206–223.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bertucci, P., & Pancaldi, G. (2001). Electric bodies: Episodes in the history of medical electricity. Bolonga, Italy: University of Bologna. Bologna Studies of History of Science, 9.
   Google Scholar
• Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, J., Ahmed, B., & Gutierrez-Osuna, R. (2012). Development and evaluation of an ambulatory stress monitor based on wearable sensors. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 16(2), 279–286. doi: 10.1109/TITB.2011.2169804
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coenen, T., Coorevits, L., & Lievens, B. (2015). The wearable Living Lab: How wearables could support Living Lab projects. Presented at the Open Living Lab Days 2015, Istanbul, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Colebrook, C. (2011). Essays on extinction. Open Humanities Press. Creative Commons. Retrieved from www.openhumanitiespress.org/books/titles/sex-after-life
   Google Scholar
• Colebrook, C. (2014). Review essay. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32, 556–570. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1068/d3203rev.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. (2003). Looking for Spinoza: Joy, sorrow and the feeling brain. New York, NY: Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• de Freitas, E. (2016a). Calculating matter and recombinant subjects: The infinitesimal and the fractal fold. Cultural Studies – Critical Methodologies, 16(5), 462–470. doi: 10.1177/1532708616655764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Freitas, E. (2016b). The new empiricism of the fractal fold: Rethinking monadology in digital times. Cultural Studies – Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 224–234. doi: 10.1177/1532708616634733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Freitas, E. (2016c). Deleuze, ontology and mathematics. In Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-981-287-532-7_374-1
   Google Scholar
• de Freitas, E. (2017). The temporal fabric of research method: Posthuman social science and the digital data deluge. Research in Education. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/toc/riea/98/1
   Google Scholar
• de Freitas, E., Dixon-Román, E., & Lather, P. (2016). Alternative ontologies of number: Rethinking the quantitative in computational culture. Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies, 16(4), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• de Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2016). The cognitive labour of mathematics dis/ability: Neurocognitive approaches to number sense. International Journal of Educational Research, 79, 222–230. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2015.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control. October, 59, 3–7. doi: 10.2307/778828
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition (P. Patton, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, F. (2007). Our biotech future. New York Review of Books. July Issue. Retrieved from http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2007/07/19/our-biotech-future/
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, D., & Callard, F. (2015). Social science and neuroscience beyond interdisciplinarity: Experimental entanglements. Theory, Culture and Society, 32(1), 3–32. doi: 10.1177/0263276414537319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1976). The history of sexuality, Volume 1: An introduction. (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, S. (2016). Biocultural creatures: Toward a new theory of the human. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galloway, A., & Thacker, E. (2007). The exploit: A theory of networks. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gane, N. (2005). The radical post-humanism of Friedrich Kittler: The primacy of technology. Theory, Culture and Society, 22(3), 25–41. doi: 10.1177/0263276405053718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillborn, D. (2016). Softly, softly: Genetics, intelligence and the hidden racism of the new geneism. Journal of Education Policy, 31(4), 365–388. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2016.1139189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, A. (2013). Bringing culture into human biology and biology back into anthropology. American Anthropologist, 115(3), 359–373. doi: 10.1111/aman.12022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravlee, C. (2009). How race becomes biology: Embodiment of social inequality. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 139(1), 47–57. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. (2015). Feed-forward: On the future of twenty-first-century media. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, G. (2016). Agential and speculative realism: Remarks on Barad’s ontology. Rhizomes: Cultural Studies in Emerging Knowledge, 30. doi: 10.20415/rhiz/030.e10
   Google Scholar
• Hayles, N. K. (2017). Unthought: The power of the cognitive nonconscious. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez, J., Riobo, I., Rozga, A., Abowd, G. D., & Picard, R. W. (2014). Using electrodermal activity to recognize ease of engagement in children during social interactions. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (pp. 307–317).
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T., & Palsson, G. (Eds.). (2013). Biosocial becomings: Integrating social and biological anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, A. (2013). Prolegomena to any future materialism: The outcome of contemporary French philosophy. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Snodgrass, M., Pietrowicz, M., Karahalios, K., & Halle, J. (2013). BEDA: Visual analytics for behavioural and physiological data. Retrieved from social.cs.uiuc.edu/papers/pdfs/BEDA_camera_ready_version_VAHC_kim.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kirby, V. (2011). Quantum anthropology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, E. (2013). How forests think: Towards an anthropology beyond the human. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landecker, H. (2016). The social as signal in the body of chromatin. The Sociological Review Monographs, 64(1), 79–99. doi: 10.1002/2059-7932.12014
   Google Scholar
• Lazzarato, M. (2002). From biopower to biopolitics. Pli: The Warwick Journal of Philosophy, 13, 112–125.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2014). Self-tracking cultures: Towards a sociology of personal informatics. Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: The Future of Design, 77–86. December 2–5. University of Technology, Sydney, Australia. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Manovich, L. (2002). The language of new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meloni, M. (2016). Political biology: Science and social value in human heredity from eugenics to epigenetics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Meloni, M., Williams, S., & Martin, P. (2016). The biosocial: Sociological themes and issues. The Sociological Review Monographs, 64(1), 7–25. doi: 10.1002/2059-7932.12010
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nafus, D. (2016). Quantified: Biosensing technologies in everyday life. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noe, A. (2004). Action in perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nold, C. (2009). Emotional cartography: Technologies of the self. Creative Commons. Retrieved from http://www.emotionalcartography.net/
   Google Scholar
• Papoulias, C., & Callard, F. (2010). Biology’s gift: Interrogating the turn to affect. Body & Society, 16(1), 29–56. doi: 10.1177/1357034X09355231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piccolini, M., & Bresadola, M. (2013). Shocking frogs: Galvani, Volta and the electric origins of neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Platoni, K. (2015). We have the technology: How biohackers, foodies, physicians & scientists are transforming human perception, one sense at a time. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Protevi, J. (2013). Life, war, earth: Deleuze and the sciences. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (2013). The human sciences in a biological age. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(1), 3–34. doi: 10.1177/0263276412456569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruppert, E., Law, J., & Savage, M. (2013). Reassembling social science methods: The challenge of digital devices. Theory, Culture and Society, 30(4), 22–46. doi: 10.1177/0263276413484941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sano, A., & Picard, R. W. (2013). Stress recognition using wearable sensors and mobile phones. In Affective computing and intelligent interaction (ACII), 2013. Humaine Association Conference (pp. 671–676). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Satel, S., & Lilienfeld, S. (2013). Brainwashed: The seductive appeal of mindless neuroscience. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, H. (2013). Life out of sequence: A data-driven history of bioinformatics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Ijzendoorn, M. H., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & Ebstein, R. P. (2011). Methylation matters in child development: Toward developmental behavioral epigenetics. Child Development Perspectives, 5(4), 305–310. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00202.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, A. (2015). Quantum mind and social science: Unifying physical and social ontology. London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, M. (2005). Reconstructing the cognitive mind: The next step. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, B. (2016). Digital education governance: Data visualization, predictive analytics, and ‘real-time’ policy instruments. Journal of Education Policy, 31(2), 123–141. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2015.1035758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. (2015). Gut feminism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Youdell, D. (2016). Bioscience and the sociology of education: The case for biosocial education. British Journal of Sociology of Education. doi: 10.1080/01425692.2016.1272406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar