Describing children at risk: experiments with context

References

• Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In W. Bijker, & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 205–224). Boston: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asdal, K. (2012). Contexts in action – And the future of the past in STS. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 37(4), 379–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benington, J., & Hartley, J. (2009). ‘Whole systems go!’ improving leadership across the whole public service system. Propositions to stimulate discussion and reform. Ascot, UK: National School of Government. Retrieved from https://trove.nla.gov.au/work/154343448?q&versionId=168257965
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (2008). Economic markets and the rise of interactive agencements: From prosthetic agencies to habilitated agencies. In T. Pinch, & R. Swedberg (Eds.), Living in a material world (pp. 29–56). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, S., & Thomsen, C. H. (2003). Handlingsvejledning ved omsorgssvigt [Guidance for action in cases of parental neglect] (2nd ed.). Vejle: Kroghs Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Ministry of Finance. (2010). Specialundervisning i folkeskolen – veje til en bedre organisering og styring [Special needs education in the school – pathways for better organization and steering]. Albertslund: Rosendahls-Schultz Distribution.
   Google Scholar
• Egelund, N. (2003). De mangfoldige elever. [The diverse pupils]. In O. Hansen (Ed.), Skolens rummelighed - fra ide til handling [The diversity of schools – from idea to action] (pp. 37–56). Copenhagen: Danish Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2014). Network alliances: Precarious governance through data, standards and code. In T. Fenwick, E. Mangez, & J. Ozga (Eds.), Governing knowledge: Comparison, knowledge-based technologies and expertise in the regulation of education (pp. 44–57). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Gitelman, L., & Jackson, V. (2013). Introduction. In L. Gitelman (Ed.), ‘Raw data’ is an oxymoron (pp. 1–14). Cambridge, MA: MIT Book Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gorur, R. (2011). ANT on the PISA-trail: Following the statistical pursuit of certainty. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(1), 76–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, O., Nordahl, T., & Egelund, N. (2009). LP-modellen – læringsmiljø og pædagogisk analyse. [The LP-model – learning environment and pedagogical analysis]. Copenhagen: Dafolo.
   Google Scholar
• ICS Metodesekretariat. (2013). Vejledning i brug af DUBU 120 Statusudtalelse - til skoleområdet. [Instructions for using DUBU 120 status statement – for schools]. Retrieved from http://www.socialstyrelsen.dk/ics/redskaber/ICSblanketter/statusudtalelse: Socialstyrelsen
   Google Scholar
• Ihde, D. (1979). Technics and praxis: A philosophy of technology. Dordrecht: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Langager, S. (2004). Plads til forskellighed? Rummelighedens retorik. [Room for diversity? The rhetorics of diversity.]. In J. Andersen (Ed.), Den rummelige skole - et fælles ansvar [The diverse school – a common responsibility] (pp. 99–126). Vejle: Kroghs Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lubeck, S., & Garrett, P. (1990). The social construction of the ‘At-risk’ child. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 11(3), 327–340. doi: 10.1080/0142569900110305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A., Moser, I., & Pols, J. (2010). Care: Putting practice into theory. In A. Mol, I. Moser, & J. Pols (Eds.), Care in practice: On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms (pp. 7–26). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Muniesa, F., Millo, Y., & Callon, M. (2007). An introduction to market devices. The Sociological Review, 55(2), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardi, B., & O’Day, V. (1999). Information ecologies: Using technology with heart. First Monday, 4(5). Retrieved from http://uncommonculture.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/669/579
   Google Scholar
• Parton, N. (2008). Changes in the form of knowledge in social work: From the ‘social’ to the ‘informational’? British Journal of Social Work, 38(2), 253–269. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcl337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratner, H. (2016). Modern settlements in special needs education: Segregated versus inclusive education. Science as Culture, 25(2), 193–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruppert, E. (2012). The governmental topologies of database devices. Theory, Culture & Society, 29(4–5), 116–136. doi: 10.1177/0263276412439428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Socialstyrelsen. (2012). Kortlægning af modeller for tværfagligt samarbejde - afsluttende rapport. [Mapping of models for interdisciplinary collaboration – final report] (No. 12-004). Aarhus, Denmark: Folkesundhed & Kvalitetsudvikling and Socialstyrelsen.
   Google Scholar
• Socialt Udviklingscenter, S., & COWI/MUUSMANN. (2012). Bedre tværfaglig indsats [Improved interdisciplinary interventions]. Copenhagen: Socialstyrelsen.
   Google Scholar
• Tsing, A. L. (2010). Worlding the matsutake diaspora, or, can actor-network theory experiment with holism? In N. Bubandt, & T. Otto (Eds.), Experiments with holism (1st ed., pp. 47–66). London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Villadsen, K., & Wahlberg, A. (2015). The government of life: Managing populations, health and scarcity. Economy and Society, 44(1), 1–17. doi: 10.1080/03085147.2014.983831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walford, A. (2013). Transforming data: An ethnography of scientific data from the Brazilian amazon (Unpublished doctoral thesis, IT University of Copenhagen). Copenhagen: IT University.
   Google Scholar
• Wishart, D., Taylor, A., & Shultz, L. (2006). The construction and production of youth ‘at risk’. Journal of Education Policy, 21(3), 291–304. doi: 10.1080/02680930600600390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar