Pedagogic affect and its politics: learning to affect and be affected in education

References

• Alldred, P., & Fox, N. J. (2017). Young bodies, power and resistance: A new materialist perspective. Journal of Youth Studies, 20(9), 1161–1175. doi: 10.1080/13676261.2017.1316362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, K., & Perrin, C. (2015). New materialism and the stuff of humanism. Australian Humanities Review, 58, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Asdal, K. (2003). The problematic nature of nature: The post-constructivist challenge to environmental history. History and Theory, 42(4), 60–74. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2303.2003.00257.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196–233). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• DeLanda, M. (2011). Philosophy and simulation: The emergence of synthetic reason. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1988). Spinoza, practical philosophy (R. Hurley, Trans.). San Francisco: City Lights Books.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (2004). Difference and repetition. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dolphijn, R., & van der Tuin, I. (2012). New materialism: Interviews & cartographies. Ann Arbor, MI: Open Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dragojlovica, A. (2015). Affective geographies: Intergenerational hauntings, bodily affectivity and multiracial subjectivities. Subjectivity, 8(4), 315–334. doi: 10.1057/sub.2015.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duff, C. (2016). G major to D major to a minor 7 (A progression to recovery). In J. Coffey, S. Budgeon, & H. Cahill (Eds.), Learning bodies: The body in youth and childhood studies (pp. 174–189). Singapore: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuk, P. (2011). Emerging approaches to educational research: Tracing the sociomaterial. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T., & Landri, P. (2012). Introduction: Materialities, textures and pedagogies – socio-material assemblages in education. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 20(1), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, N. J., & Alldred, P. (2016). Sociology and the new materialism: Theory, research, action. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, N. J., & Alldred, P. (2018). New materialism. In P. A. Atkinson, S. Delamont, M. A. Hardy, & M. Williams (Eds.), The SAGE encyclopedia of research methods (pp. 1–16). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, N. J., Bissell, P., Peacock, M., & Blackburn, J. (2018). The micropolitics of obesity: Materialism, markets and food sovereignty. Sociology, 52(1), 111–127. doi: 10.1177/0038038516647668
   Google Scholar
• Hickey-Moody, A. (2013). Affect as method: Feelings, aesthetics and affective pedagogy. In R. Coleman, & J. Ringrose (Eds.), Deleuze and research methodologies (pp. 79–95). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hickey-Moody, A., & Page, T. (2016). Arts, pedagogy and cultural resistance: New materialisms. Lanham. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield International.
   Google Scholar
• Isin, E. (2014, February 26). Acts, affects, calls. Open Democracy, pp. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, R., Zapasnik, J., McCann, H., & Bruce, M. (2013). All those little machines: Assemblage as transformative theory. Australian Humanities Review, 55, 45–66.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1996). Aramis, or, the love of technology (C. Porter, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2004). How to talk about the body? The normative dimension of science studies. Body & Society, 10(2–3), 205–229. doi: 10.1177/1357034X04042943
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., & Stark, M. G. (1999). Factures/fractures: From the concept of network to the concept of attachment. RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics, 36(Autumn), 20–31.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2009). Actor-network theory and material semiotics. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), The new blackwell companion to social theory (3rd ed., pp. 141–158). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lenters, K. (2016). Riding the lines and overwriting in the margins: Affect and multimodal literacy practices. Journal of Literacy Research, 48(3), 280–316. doi: 10.1177/1086296X16658982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2017). Data thing-power: How do personal digital data come to matter? Retrieved from SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract = 2998571.
   Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. (2013). The wonder of data. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 13(4), 228–232. doi: 10.1177/1532708613487863
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (1987). Translator’s foreword: Pleasures of philosophy & notes on the translation and acknowledgements. In G. Deleuze & F. Guattari (Eds.), A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (pp. ix–xix). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzei, L. A. (2013). Materialist mappings of knowing in being: Researchers constituted in the production of knowledge. Gender and Education, 25(6), 776–785. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2013.824072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, M. (2015). Assemblages and actor-networks: Rethinking socio-material power, politics and space. Geography Compass, 9(1), 27–41. doi: 10.1111/gec3.12192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, M., & Schurr, C. (2016). Assemblage thinking and actor-network theory: Conjunctions, disjunctions, cross-fertilisations. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 41(3), 217–229. doi: 10.1111/tran.12117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemorin, S. (2017). Affective capture in digital school spaces and the modulation of student subjectivities. Emotion, Space and Society, 24(August), 11–18. doi: 10.1016/j.emospa.2017.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niccolini, A. (2016). Animate affects: Censorship, reckless pedagogies, and beautiful feelings. Gender and Education, 28(2), 230–249. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2015.1121205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, A. (2008). New ontologies. In A. Pickering, & K. Guzik (Eds.), The mangle in practice: Science, society, and becoming (pp. 1–14). Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, A. (2017). In our place: Performance, dualism, and islands of stability. Common Knowledge, 23(3). doi: 10.1215/0961754X-3987761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M. (2015). Becoming aware: Towards a post-constructivist theory of learning. Learning: Research and Practice, 1(1), 38–50.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M. (2017). Astonishment: A post-constructivist investigation into mathematics as passion. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 95(1), 97–111. doi: 10.1007/s10649-016-9733-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouse, J. (2002). Vampires: Social constructivism, realism and other philosophical undead. History and Theory, 41(1), 60–78. doi: 10.1111/1468-2303.00191
   Google Scholar
• Seyfert, R. (2012). Beyond personal feelings and collective emotions: Toward a theory of social affect. Theory, Culture & Society, 29(6), 27–46. doi: 10.1177/0263276412438591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaby, J. (2016). Relational affect. Working Paper SFB 1171 Affective Societies 02/16, 1–31. Retrieved from http://edocs.fu-berlin.de/docs/receive/FUDOCS_series_000000000562.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, E. (2009). The materiality of learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. A., & Ivinson, G. (2013). Material feminisms: New directions for education. Gender and Education, 25(6), 665–670. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2013.834617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. (2008). Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Todd, S., Jones, R., & O'Donnell, A. (2016). Shifting education's philosophical imaginaries: Relations, affects, bodies, materialities. Gender and Education, 28(2), 187–194. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2015.1134860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trofanenko, B. (2014). Affective emotions: The pedagogical challenges of knowing war. The Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 36(1), 22–39. doi: 10.1080/10714413.2014.866820
   Google Scholar
• van der Tuin, I. (2016). Microaggressions as new political material for feminist scholars and activists: Perspectives from continental philosophy, the new materialisms, and popular culture. Australian Feminist Studies, 31(89), 246–262. doi: 10.1080/08164649.2016.1254029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, J. M. (2011). Assemblage. In C. J. Stivale (Ed.), Gilles deleuze: Key concepts (2nd ed.) (pp. 91–102). Durham: Acumen.
   Google Scholar
• Zevenbergen, R. (1996). Constructivism as a liberal bourgeois discourse. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31(1–2), 95–113. doi: 10.1007/BF00143928
   Google Scholar