STS in/as education: where do we stand and what is there (still) to gain? Some outlines for a future research agenda

References

• Colebrook, C. (2017). What is this thing called education? Qualitative Inquiry, 23(9), 649–655. doi: 10.1177/1077800417725357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decuypere, M., & Simons, M. (2016a). Relational thinking in education: Topology, sociomaterial studies, and figures. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 24(3), 371–386. doi: 10.1080/14681366.2016.1166150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decuypere, M., & Simons, M. (2016b). Continuing attachments in academic work in neoliberal times: On the academic mode of existence. Critical Studies in Education, 1–19. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17508487.2016.1240095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Freitas, E. (2012). The classroom as rhizome: New strategies for diagramming knotted interactions. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(7), 557–570. doi: 10.1177/1077800412450155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Freitas, E., Lupinacci, J., & Pais, A. (2017). Science and technology studies × educational studies: Critical and creative perspectives on the future of STEM education. Educational Research, 53(6), 551–559.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, R., Fenwick, T., & Sawchuk, P. (2015). Emerging approaches to educational research: Tracing the socio-material. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2010). Actor-network theory in education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T., & Landri, P. (2012). Materialities, textures and pedagogies: Socio-material assemblages in education. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 20, 1–7. doi: 10.1080/14681366.2012.649421
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, S. (2006). The philosophy of science and technology studies. New York/London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, E. (2013). How forests think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. Berkeley, LA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1999). On recalling ANT. In J. Law, & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 15–25). Oxford, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. An introduction to actor network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2010). Cogitamus. Six lettres sur les humanités scientifiques. [Cogitamus. Six letters on the scientific humanities.].
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2013). An inquiry into modes of existence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2014). On selves, forms, and forces. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4(2), 261–266. doi: 10.14318/hau4.2.014
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2007). Pinboards and books: Juxtaposing, learning and materiality. In D. W. Kritt & L. T. Winegar (Eds.), Education and technology: Critical perspectives, possible futures (pp. 125–149). Plymouth: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2009). Actor network theory and material semiotics. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), The new Blackwell companion to social theory (pp. 141–158). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., & Thompson, G. (2017). Doing time in the sociology of education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1080/01425692.2016.1260854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masschelein, J., & Simons, M. (2013). In defense of the school. Leuven: E-ducation, Culture & Society Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. (2010). Actor-network theory: Sensitive terms and enduring tensions. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 50(1), 253–269.
   Google Scholar
• Packer, M. (2018). The science of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popkewitz, T. (2007). Cosmopolitanism and the age of school reform: Science, education and making society by making the child. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Serres, M. (2017). Geometry: The third book of foundations. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, M., & Elen, J. (2007). The ‘research–teaching nexus’ and ‘education through research’: An exploration of ambivalences. Studies in Higher Education, 32(5), 617–631. doi: 10.1080/03075070701573781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E. (2009). The materiality of learning: Technology and knowledge in educational practice. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, I. (2016). In catastrophic times: Resisting the coming barbarism. Open Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Venturini, T. (2010). Diving in magma: How to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science, 19, 258–273. doi: 10.1177/0963662509102694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venturini, T. (2012). Building on faults: How to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Understanding of Science, 21, 796–812. doi: 10.1177/0963662510387558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolgar, S. (1990). Configuring the user: The case of usability trials. The Sociological Review, 38(S1), 58–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03349.x
   Google Scholar
• Woolgar, S., & Lezaun, J. (2013). The wrong bin bag: A turn to ontology in science and technology studies? Social Studies of Science, 43(3), 321–340. doi: 10.1177/0306312713488820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar