1,400
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Capitalism without capital: the intangible economy of education reform

Reference s

  • Bamberger, A., Morris, P., & Yemini, M. (2019). Neoliberalism, internationalisation and higher education: Connections, contradictions and alternatives. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/01596306.2019.1569879
  • Baroutsis, A., & Lingard, B. (2016). Counting and comparing school performance: An analysis of media coverage of PISA in Australia, 2000–2014. Journal of Education Policy, 1–18. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2016.1252856
  • Blackmore, J. (2019). Feminism and neo/liberalism: Contesting education’s possibilities. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 40(3), 337–349.
  • Blair, M., & Wallman, S. M. (2001). Unseen wealth: Report of the Brookings task force on intangibles. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Chorafas, D. N. (2009). Capitalism without capital. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Chun, H., Miyagawa, T., Pyo, H., & Tonogi, K. (2015). Intangibles and productivity growth: Evidence from Japan and Korea. Retrieved from https://voxeu.org/article/intangibles-and-productivity-growth-evidence-japan-and-korea
  • de Freitas, E. (2017). The temporal fabric of research methods: Posthuman social science and the digital data deluge. Research in Education, 98(1), 27–43. doi: 10.1177/0034523717723386
  • de Freitas, E., & Dixon-Román, E. (2017). The computational turn in education research: Critical and creative perspectives on the digital data deluge. Research in Education, 98(1), 3–13. doi: 10.1177/0034523717723384
  • EdSurge. (2016). Following Edtech money: How does money shape the K-12 Edtech sector? The State of Edtech 2016: How money shapes tools and schools. Retrieved from https://www.edsurge.com/research/special-reports/state-of-edtech-2016/funding
  • Ertas, N., & McKnight, A. N. (2019). Clarifying and reframing the neoliberal critique of educational policy using policy process theories. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/01596306.2019.1569881
  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977 (C. Gordon, L. Marshall, J. Mepham, & K. Soper, Trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.
  • Foucault, M. (2012). Discipline & punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.
  • Fraser, N. (2013). Fortunes of feminism: From state-managed capitalism to neoliberal crisis. London: Verso.
  • Fraser, N. (2014). Can society be commodities all the way down? Post-Polanyian reflections on capitalist crisis. Economy and Society, 43(4), 541–558. doi: 10.1080/03085147.2014.898822
  • Gorur, R. (2014). Towards a sociology of measurement in education policy. European Educational Research Journal, 13(1), 58–72. doi: 10.2304/eerj.2014.13.1.58
  • Gorur, R. (2016). Seeing like PISA: A cautionary tale about the performativity of international assessments. European Educational Research Journal, 15(5), 598–616. doi: 10.1177/1474904116658299
  • Gorur, R. (2017). Statistics and statecraft: Exploring the potentials, politics and practices of international educational assessment. Critical Studies in Education, 58(3), 261–265. doi: 10.1080/17508487.2017.1353271
  • Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: The PISA ‘effect’ in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37. doi: 10.1080/02680930802412669
  • Gulson, K. N., & Webb, P. T. (2017). Mapping an emergent field of ‘computational education policy’: Policy rationalities, prediction and data in the age of artificial intelligence. Research in Education, 98(1), 14–26. doi: 10.1177/0034523717723385
  • Haskel, J., & Westlake, S. (2017). Capitalism without capital: The rise of the intangible economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Humphrey, N., Curran, A., Morris, E., Farrell, P., & Woods, K. (2007). Emotional intelligence and education: A critical review. Educational Psychology, 27(2), 235–254. doi: 10.1080/01443410601066735
  • Langley, P., & Leyshon, A. (2016). Platform capitalism: The intermediation and capitalization of digital economic circulation. Finance and Society, 3(1), 11–31. doi: 10.2218/finsoc.v3i1.1936
  • Lewis, S. (2017). Governing schooling through ‘what works’: The OECD’s PISA for schools. Journal of Education Policy, 32(3), 281–302. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2016.1252855
  • Lingard, B. (2011). Policy as numbers: Ac/counting for educational research. The Australian Educational Researcher, 38(4), 355–382. doi: 10.1007/s13384-011-0041-9
  • Lingard, B., Martino, W., & Rezai-Rashti, G. (2013). Testing regimes, accountabilities and education policy: Commensurate global and national developments. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 539–556. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2013.820042
  • Malin, J., Hardy, I., & Lubienski, C. (2019). Educational neoliberalization: The mediatization of ethical assertions in the voucher debate. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/01596306.2019.1569880
  • Marks, G. N. (2017). Is SES really that important for educational outcomes in Australia? A review and some recent evidence. The Australian Educational Researcher, 44(2), 191–211. doi: 10.1007/s13384-016-0219-2
  • Means, A. J., & Slater, G. B. (2019). The dark mirror of capital: On post-neoliberal formations and the future of education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/01596306.2019.1569876.
  • Nagle, A. (2017). Kill all normies: Online culture wars from 4Chan and Tumblr to Trump and the alt-right. London: John Hunt Publishing.
  • OECD. (2011). Private schools: Who benefits? PISA in Focus 7. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisainfocus/48482894.pdf
  • OECD. (2013). New sources of growth: Knowledge-based capital: Key analyses and policy conclusions: Synthesis report. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/knowledge-based-capital-synthesis.pdf
  • OECD. (2015). The ABC of gender equality in education: Aptitude, behaviour, confidence. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • OECD. (2016). Low-performing students: Why they fall behind and how to help them succeed. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Ong, A. (2006). Neoliberalism as exception: Mutations in citizenship and sovereignty. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Ong, A. (2007). Neoliberalism as a mobile technology. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(1), 3–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00234.x
  • Pluim, C., & Gard, M. (2018). Physical education’s grand convergence: Fitnessgram®, big-data and the digital commerce of children’s health. Critical Studies in Education, 59(3), 261–278. doi: 10.1080/17508487.2016.1194303
  • Rowe, E. E. (2017). Middle-class school choice in urban spaces: The economics of public schooling and globalized education reform. New York: Routledge.
  • Rowe, E. E. (2019). The youth bulge: Remaking precarity in times of illegitimacy. In P. Kelly, P. Campbell, L. Harrison, & C. Hickey (Eds.), Young people and the politics of hope and outrage (pp. 186–206). Netherlands: Brill Publishing.
  • Rowe, E. E., & Gerrard, J. (Forthcoming). Global social movements and dialogical pedagogy: Politics, power and process. In S. Riddle & M. W. Apple (Eds.), Re-imagining education for democracy. London: Routledge.
  • Rowe, E., Lubienski, C., Skourdoumbis, A., Gerrard, J., & Hursh, D. (2019). Templates, typologies and typifications: Neoliberalism as keyword. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/01596306.2019.1569875
  • Rutkowski, D., & Rutkowski, L. (2013). Measuring socioeconomic background in PISA: One size might not fit all. Research in Comparative and International Education, 8(3), 259–278. doi: 10.2304/rcie.2013.8.3.259
  • Singer, N. (2015). Privacy pitfalls as education apps spread haphazardly. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/12/technology/learning-apps-outstrip-school-oversight-and-student-privacy-is-among-the-risks.html
  • Strauss, V. (2018). Teachers are now being asked to punch time clocks. What does that mean for their profession? Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2018/03/04/teachers-are-now-being-asked-to-punch-time-clocks-what-does-that-mean-for-their-profession/?utm_term=.57738f160db4
  • Verger, A., Fontdevila, C., & Parcerisa, L. (2019). Reforming governance through policy instruments: How and to what extent standards, tests and accountability in education spread worldwide. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/01596306.2019.1569882
  • Williamson, B. (2017). Learning in the ‘platform society’: Disassembling an educational data assemblage. Research in Education, 98(1), 59–82. doi: 10.1177/0034523717723389
  • Windle, J. (2019). Neoliberalism, imperialism and conservatism: Tangled logics of educational inequality in the global South. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/01596306.2019.1569878
  • Wolgemuth, J. R., Koro-Ljungberg, M., Marn, T. M., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Dougherty, S. M. (2018). Start here, or here, no here: Introductions to rethinking education policy and methodology in a post-truth era. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26(145), 1–12.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.