Set in motion by data: Human and data intra-actions in educational governance

References

• Ball, S. J. (2017). Governing by numbers: Education, governance, and the tyranny of numbers. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G. S. (1976). The economic approach to human behavior. Chicago: The Univ. of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brøgger, K. (2016). The rule of mimetic desire in higher education: Governing through naming, shaming and faming. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(1), 72–91. doi:10.1080/01425692.2015.1096191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brøgger, K. (2018). The performative power of (Non)human agency assemblages of soft governance. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 31(5), 353–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brøgger, K. (2019). Governing through standards: The faceless masters of higher education: The Bologna process, the EU and the open method of coordination. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Brøgger, K., & Staunæs, D. (2016). Standards and (self)implosion: How the circulation of affects accelerates the spread of standards and intensifies the embodiment of colliding, temporal ontologies. Theory & Psychology, 26(2), 223–242. doi:10.1177/0959354316635889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon-Román, E. (2016). Diffractive possibilities: Cultural studies and quantification. Transforming Anthropology, 24(2), 157–167. doi:10.1111/traa.12074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ENQA. (2015). Standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG). Brussels, Belgium: European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ENQA), European Students’ Union (ESU), European University Association (EUA), European Association of Institutions in Higher Education (EURASHE). https://enqa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ESG_2015.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Espeland, W. N., & Sauder, M. (2007). Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 1–40. doi:10.1086/517897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espeland, W. N., & Sauder, M. (2016). Engines of anxiety: Academic rankings, reputation, and accountability. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Finansministeriet. (2014). Aftale om en vækstpakke 2014. https://www.fm.dk/nyheder/pressemeddelelser/2014/07/aftale-om-en-vaekstpakke-2014.
   Google Scholar
• Goldthorpe, J. H. (2000). On sociology: Numbers, narratives, and the integration of research and theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gorur, R. (2012). ANT on the PISA trail: Following the statistical pursuit of certainty. In T. J. Fenwick, & R. Edwards (Eds.), Researching education through actor-network theory (pp. 60–77). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: The PISA ‘effect’ in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37. doi:10.1080/02680930802412669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Højgaard, L., & Søndergaard, D. M. (2011). Theorizing the complexities of discursive and material subjectivity: Agential realism and poststructural analyses. Theory & Psychology, 21(3), 338–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juelskjær, M., & Staunæs, D. (2016). Orchestrating intensities and rhythms: How post-psychologies are assisting new educational standards and reforming subjectivities. Theory & Psychology, 26(2), 182–201. doi:10.1177/0959354316634217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, S. (2018). PISA ‘yet to come': Governing schooling through time, difference and potential. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 39(5), 683–697. doi:10.1080/01425692.2017.1406338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., & Sellar, S. (2013). ‘Catalyst data': Perverse systemic effects of audit and accountability in Australian schooling. Journal of Education Policy: Testing regimes. Accountabilities and Education Policy, 28(5), 634–656. doi:10.1080/02680939.2012.758815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen, M. (2019). Entangled Simplicities: A metricography on 'relevance' and 'graduate employability' configurations in Danish university education. (PhD). Aarhus University, Arhus.
   Google Scholar
• Madsen, M. (2021). The configurative agency of metrics in education: A research agenda involving a different engagement with data. Journal of Education Policy, 36(1), 64–83. doi:10.1080/02680939.2019.1682679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P. (2001). Governing by numbers: Why calculative practices matter. Social Research, 68(2), 379–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissen, M., Staunæs, D., & Bank, M. (2016). A “post-psychological” curiosity about subjectivities and standards. Theory & Psychology, 26(2), 137–143. doi:10.1177/0959354316628691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piattoeva, N., & Boden, R. (2020). Escaping numbers? The ambiguities of the governance of education through data. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 29(1-2), 1–18. doi:10.1080/09620214.2020.1725590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1991). Governing by numbers: Figuring out democracy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16(7), 673–692. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(91)90019-B
   Google Scholar
• Sellar, S. (2015). A feel for numbers: Affect, data and education policy. Critical Studies in Education, 56(1), 131–146. doi:10.1080/17508487.2015.981198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2018). International large-scale assessments, affective worlds and policy impacts in education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 31(5), 367–381. doi:10.1080/09518398.2018.1449982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Danish Accreditation Institution. (2013). Guide to institutional accreditation. https://akkr.dk/wp-content/filer/akkr/Korekturl%C3%A6st-og-godkendt_Vejledning-om-institutionsakkreditering-endelig_godkendt.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, P. T., & Gulson, K,N. (2012). Policy prolepsis in education: Encounters, becomings, and phantasms. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 33(1), 87–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, P. T., Sellar, S., & Gulson, K. N. (2019). Anticipating education: Governing habits, memories and policy-futures. Learning, Media and Technology, 1–14. doi:10.1080/17439884.2020.1686015
   Google Scholar