Taking, begging, or waiting for the floor: students’ social backgrounds, entitlement and agency in classroom discourse

References

• Adair, J. K., Colegrove, K. S. S., & McManus, M. E. (2017). How the word gap argument negatively impacts young children of latinx immigrants’ conceptualizations of learning. Harvard Educational Review, 87(3), 309–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asterhan, C. S., & Schwarz, B. B. (2009). Argumentation and explanation in conceptual change: Indications from protocol analyses of peer-to-peer dialog. Cognitive Science, 33(3), 374–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aukrust, V. G. (2008). Boys’ and girls’ conversational participation across four grade levels in Norwegian classrooms: Taking the floor or being given the floor? Gender and Education, 20(3), 237–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barak, M., Lefstein, A., Kaner-Furman, T., & Shem-Tov, S. (2020). Academically productive dialogue: Introduction, tools and instructional units. Israel (in Hebrew): Laboratory for the Study of Pedagogy, Department of Education, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev and Mofet Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Berekashvili, N. (2012). The role of gender-biased perceptions in teacher-student interaction. Psychology of Language and Communication, 16(1), 39–51.
   Google Scholar
• Black, L. (2004). Differential participation in whole-class discussions and the construction of marginalised identities. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 5(1), 34–54.
   Google Scholar
• Block, D., & Corona, V. (2014). Exploring class-based intersectionality. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 27(1), 27–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1977). Reproduction in education, culture and society. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1970). Teachers’ communication of differential expectations for children’s classroom performance: Some behavioral data. Journal of Educational Psychology, 61(5), 365–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calarco, J. M. (2011). ‘I need help!’ social class and children’s help-seeking in elementary school. American Sociological Review, 76(6), 862–882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calarco, J. M. (2018). Negotiating opportunities: How the middle class secures advantages in school. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, S. N. (2015). The right to speak. In L. B. Resnick, C. S. C. Asterhan, & S. Clarke (Eds.), Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue (pp. 167–180). Washington, DC: AERA.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, S. N., Howley, I., Resnick, L., & Rosé, C. P. (2016). Student agency to participate in dialogic science discussions. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 10(Sept), 27–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganzeboom, H. B. (2010). A new international socio-economic index (ISEI) of occupational status for the international standard classification of occupation 2008 (ISCO-08) constructed with data from the ISSP 2002–2007. In Annual Conference of International Social Survey Programme, Lisbon (Vol. 1).
   Google Scholar
• Golann, J. W., & Darling-Aduana, J. (2020). Toward a multifaceted understanding of lareau’s ‘sense of entitlement’: Bridging sociological and psychological constructs. Sociology Compass, 14(7), e12798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helgevold, N. (2016). Teaching as creating space for participation: Establishing a learning community in diverse classrooms. Teachers and Teaching, 22(3), 315–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, C., Hennessy, S., Mercer, N., Vrikki, M., & Wheatley, L. (2019). Teacher–student dialogue during classroom teaching: Does it really impact on student outcomes? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(4–5), 462–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. J. (2014). (Re)categorizing language-minority literacies in restrictive educational contexts. International Multilingual Research Journal, 8(3), 167–188.
   Google Scholar
• Jurik, V., Gröschner, A., & Seidel, T. (2014). Predicting students’ cognitive learning activity and intrinsic learning motivation: How powerful are teacher statements, student profiles, and gender? Learning and Individual Differences, 32(May), 132–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katriel, T. (2016). The metapragmatics of direct utterances. In A. Capone, & J. L. Mey (Eds.), Interdisciplinary studies in pragmatics, culture and society (pp. 745–766). Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Koole, T. (2003). The interactive construction of heterogeneity in the classroom. Linguistics and Education, 14(1), 3–26.
   Google Scholar
• Kovalainen, M., & Kumpulainen, K. (2007). The social construction of participation in an elementary classroom community. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(3–4), 141–158.
   Google Scholar
• Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lefstein, A., Pollak, I., & Segal, A. (2020). Compelling student voice: Dialogic practices of public confession. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 41(1), 110–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Losey, K. M. (1995). Mexican American students and classroom interaction: An overview and critique. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 283–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. (1992). Understanding inequality in schools: The contribution of interpretive studies. Sociology of Education, 65(1), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P. J., & Sperry, D. E. (2012). Déjà vu: The continuing misrecognition of low-income children’s verbal abilities. In S. T. Fiske, & H. R. Markus (Eds.), Facing social class: How societal rank influences interaction (pp. 109–130). New York: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. K., & Schutz, R. (2007). Day care differences and the reproduction of social class. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 36(3), 281–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, C., Michaels, S., & Chapin, S. (2015). ‘Scaling down’ to explore the role of talk in learning: From district intervention to controlled classroom study. In L. Resnick, C. Asterhan, & S. Clarke (Eds.), Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue (pp. 111–126). Washington, DC: AERA.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, C., Michaels, S., Chapin, S., & Harbaugh, A. G. (2017). The silent and the vocal: Participation and learning in whole-class discussion. Learning and Instruction, 48(April), 5–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainio, A. P. (2008). From resistance to involvement: Examining agency and control in a playworld activity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 15(2), 115–140.
   Google Scholar
• Rampton, B., Maybin, J., & Roberts, C. (2015). Theory and method in linguistic ethnography. In J. Snell, S. Shaw, & F. Copland (Eds.), Linguistic ethnography: Interdisciplinary explorations (pp. 14–50). London: Palgrave Advances Series.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rismark, M. (1996). The likelihood of success during classroom discourse. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 40(1), 57–68.
   Google Scholar
• Sadker, D. M., & Zittleman, K. (2016). Gender bias: From colonial America to today’s classroom. In J. A. Banks, & C. A. M. Banks (Eds.), Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives, 9th Ed (pp. 81–98). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sedova, K., & Navratilova, J. (2020). Silent students and the patterns of their participation in classroom talk. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 29(4–5), 681–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedova, K., Sedlacek, M., & Svaricek, R. (2016). Teacher professional development as a means of transforming student classroom talk. Teaching and Teacher Education, 57(1), 14–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal, A., & Lefstein, A. (2016). Exuberant, voiceless participation: An unintended consequence of dialogic sensibilities? L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 16(April), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Snell, J., & Lefstein, A. (2018). ‘Low ability’, participation, and identity in dialogic pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 55(1), 40–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streib, J. (2011). Class reproduction by four year olds. Qualitative Sociology, 34(2), 337–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streib, J. (2018). Class, culture, and downward mobility. Poetics, 70(Oct), 18–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swann, J., & Graddol, D. (1988). Gender inequalities in classroom talk. English in Education, 22(1), 48–65.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Younger, M., Warrington, M., & Williams, J. (1999). The gender gap and classroom interactions: Reality and rhetoric? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(3), 325–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar