Teaching in the afterward: undoing order-words and affirming transversal alternatives

References

• Alexander, R. J. (2008). Essays on pedagogy. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alvermann, D. E. (2000). Researching libraries, literacies, and lives: A rhizoanalysis. In E. A. St Pierre, & W. S. Pillow (Eds.), Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education (pp. 114–129). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aoki, T. T. (1993). Legitimising lived curriculum: Towards a curricular landscape of multiplicity. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 8(3), 255–268.
   Google Scholar
• Aoki, T. T. (2005). Spinning inspirited images in the midst of planned and live(d) curricula. In R. L. Irwin, & W. F. Pinar (Eds.), Curriculum in a new key (pp. 413–423). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. W. (1979). Ideology and curriculum. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, P., & Hill, M. (2014). Preparing for a renaissance in assessment. London: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Bignall, S., & Braidotti, R. (2018). Posthuman systems. In R. Braidotti, & S. Bignall (Eds.), Posthuman ecologies: Complexity and process after deleuze (pp. 1–16). London: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2007). Introduction: Assessment for the longer term. In D. Boud, & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term (pp. 3–14). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2006). Transpositions: On nomadic ethics. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, P. T. (2009). The new empiricism: Affect and sociological method. European Journal of Social Theory, 12(1), 43–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, D. R. (2013). Affective literacies: Deleuze, discipline and power. In I. Semetsky, & D. Masny (Eds.), Deleuze and education (pp. 94–111). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colebrook, C. (2017). What is this thing called education? Qualitative Inquiry, 23(9), 649–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotterill, T. (2016). Monitoring and evaluating learning. In A. O’Grady, & V. Cottle (Eds.), Exploring education at postgraduate level: Policy, theory and practice (pp. 3–11). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Danielewicz, J. (2001). Teaching selves: Identity, pedagogy, and teacher education. Albany: State University of New York Press (SUNY).
   Google Scholar
• de Freitas, E. (2016). The new empiricism of the fractal fold: Rethinking monadology in digital times. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 224–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1968/2014). Difference and repetition. (P. Patton, trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1969/1990). The logic of sense. (C. V. Boundas, with C. Stivale, Eds.; M. Lester, trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control. October, 59, 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (2001). Pure immanence: Essays on a life. (A. Boyman, Trans.). New York: Zone.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987/2004). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. (B. Massumi, Trans.). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1991/1994). What is philosophy? (G. Burchell & H. Tomlinson, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dolphijn, R., & van der Tuin, I. (2012). New materialism: Interviews and cartographies. London: Open Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaztambide-Fernández, R. (2015). Thinking beyond the human. Curriculum Inquiry, 45(3), 245–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, M. (1993). Diversity and inclusion: Toward a curriculum for human beings. Teachers College Record, 95(2), 211–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. (2017). The incorporeal: Ontology, ethics, and the limits of materialism. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guattari, F. (1995). Chaosmosis: The ethico-aesthetic paradigm. Sydney: Power Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1992). The promises of monsters: A regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural studies (pp. 295–337). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1997). Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium.FemaleMan©_Meets_OncoMouse™: Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, M. J., Davies, C., Bell, H., Goodley, C., Fox, S., & Downing, B. (2020). (Un)teaching the ‘datafied student subject’: Perspectives from an education-based masters in an English university. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(4), 401–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (2013). Methodology–21: What do we do in the afterward? International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 634–645.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B. (2011). Policy as numbers: Ac/counting for educational research. The Australian Educational Researcher, 38(4), 355–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lock, J., Kim, B., Koh, K., & Wilcox, G. (2018). Navigating the tensions of innovative assessment and pedagogy in higher education. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(1), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looney, A., Cumming, J., van Der Kleij, F., & Harris, K. (2018). Reconceptualising the role of teachers as assessors: Teacher assessment identity. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(5), 442–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maclure, M. (2010). The offence of theory. Journal of Education Policy, 25(2), 277–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 658–667.
   Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. (2016). The refrain of the a-grammatical child: Finding another language in/for qualitative research. Cultural Studies - Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 173–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. (2021). Inquiry as divination. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(5), 502–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manen, M. V. (2013). The call of pedagogy as the call of contact. Phenomenology & Practice, 6(2), 8–34.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, E., & Kuipers, H. (2019). How the minor moves us across thresholds, socialities, and techniques. A conversation with Erin Manning. Open! Platform for art, culture, and the public domain.
   Google Scholar
• Masny, D. (2013). Rhizoanalytic pathways in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(5), 339–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masny, D., & Cole, D. R. (2009). Multiple literacies theory: A Deleuzian perspective. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (2011). Semblance and event: Activist philosophy and the occurrent arts. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (2018). 99 theses on the reevaluation of value. A postcapitalist manifesto. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzei, L. A. (2013). A voice without organs: Interviewing in posthumanist research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 732–740.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzei, L. A. (2016). Voice without a subject. Cultural Studies - Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 151–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight, L., Rousell, D., Charteris, J., Thomas, K., & Burke, G. (2017). The invisible hand: Designing curriculum in the afterward. The International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30(7), 635–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, J. (2013). Why we need research on classroom assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 2–16). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. (2008). Defining pedagogy. In K. Hall, P. Murphy, & J. Soler (Eds.), Pedagogy and practice: Culture and identities (pp. 28–39). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. F. (1978). The reconceptualisation of curriculum studies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 10(3), 205–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. F. (2012). The character of curriculum studies: Bildung, currere, and the recurring question of the subject. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. F. (2013). International handbook of curriculum research. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M., & Biesta, G. (2013). Reinventing the curriculum: New trends in curriculum policy and practice. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, S. L. (2008). Remaking the world: Neoliberalism and the transformation of education and teachers’ labor. In M. Compton, & L. Weiner (Eds.), The global assault on teaching, teachers and their unions (pp. 11–30). New York: Palgrave Macmillian.
   Google Scholar
• Rousell, D. (2019). Inhuman forms of life: On art as a problem for post-qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32(7), 887–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousell, D. (2021a). Immersive cartography and post-qualitative inquiry: A speculative adventure into research-creation. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rousell, D. (2021b). A map you can walk into: Immersive cartography and the speculative potentials of data. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(5), 580–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, I., & Reimann, N. (2018). Variation in the development of teachers’ understandings of assessment and their assessment practices in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(1), 131–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, B. (1981). Why no pedagogy in england? In B. Simon, & W. Taylor (Eds.), Education in the eighties: The central issues (pp. 124–145). London: Batsford.
   Google Scholar
• Snaza, N., Appelbaum, P., Bayne, S., Carlson, D., Morris, M., Rotas, N., … Weaver, J. A. (2014). Toward a posthuman education. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 30(2), 39–55.
   Google Scholar
• Snaza, N., & Weaver, J. (2015). Introduction: Education and the posthumanist turn. In N. Snaza, & J. Weaver (Eds.), Posthumanism and educational research (pp. 1–16). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• St Pierre, E. A. (2004). Deleuzian concepts for education: The subject undone. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36(3), 283–296.
   Google Scholar
• St Pierre, E. A. (2016a). Untraining educational researchers. Research in Education, 96(1), 6–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St Pierre, E. A. (2016b). Deleuze and Guattari’s language for new empirical inquiry. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(11), 1080–1089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St Pierre, E. A. (2019). Post qualitative inquiry, the refusal of method, and the risk of the new. Qualitative inquiry. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419863005
   Google Scholar
• St Pierre, E. A., Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2016). New empiricisms and new materialisms: Conditions for new inquiry. Cultural Studies - Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 99–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swarbrick, S. (2017). Materialism without matter: Deleuze. Critical Posthumanism. https://criticalposthumanism.net/author/steven-swarbrick/.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. A., & Bayley, A. (2019). Posthumanism and higher education: Reimagining pedagogy, practice and research. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, H. (2007). Assessment as learning? How the use of explicit learning objectives, assessment criteria and feedback in post-secondary education and training can come to dominate learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(3), 281–294.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, H. (2017). Blaming the victim: Assessment, examinations, and the responsibilisation of students and teachers in neo-liberal governance. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 38(1), 83–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer, J. B. (2017). Posthumanism as research methodology: Inquiry in the Anthropocene. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30(9), 832–848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar