The Methodological Resolution of the Cambridge Controversies

References

• Alexander, R. D. Darwinism and Human Affairs. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Blaug, M. The Cambridge Revolution: Success or Failure? Rev. ed. London: Institute of Economic Affairs, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Blaug, M. Economic Theory in Retrospect. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Blaug, M. The Methodology of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, B. Beyond Positivism: Economic Methodology in the Twentieth Century. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. “’The Laws of Returns Under Competitive Conditions’: Progress in Microeconomics Since Sraffa (1926)?” Eastern Economic Journal, July-September 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, P. “Post Keynesian Economics.” In The Crisis in Economic Theory. Ed. by D. Bell and I. Kristol. New York: Basic Books, 1981, 151–173.
   Google Scholar
• Deane, P. “The Scope and Method of Economic Science.” Economic Journal, March 1983, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dow, S. C. “Methodological Morality in the Cambridge Controversies.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Spring 1980, 2(3), 368–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichner, A. S., and Kregel, J. A. “An Essay on Post-Keynesian Theory: A New Paradigm in Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature, December 1975, 1293–1314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, C. E. The Neoclassical Theory of Production and Distribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Ghiselin, M. T. Triumph of the Darwinian Method. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, S. J. “The Validation of Continental Drift.” In Ever Since Danvin. New York: W. W. Norton, 1977, 160–167.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, F. H. “The Winter of Our Discontent.” Economica, August 1973, 322–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, N. R. Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Harcourt, G. C. “The Cambridge Controversies: Old Ways and New Horizons—Or Dead End.” Oxford Economic Papers, March 1976, 25–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, J. R. “Some Questions of Time in Economics.” In Evolution, Welfare and Time in Economics. Ed. by A. M. Tang, F. M. Westfield, and J. S. Worley. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 1976, 135–151.
   Google Scholar
• Kaldor, N. “The Irrelevance of Equilibrium Economics.” Economic Journal, December 1972, 1237–1255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenyon, P. “Pricing.” In A Guide to Post-Keynesian Economics. Ed. by A. S. Eichner. White Plains, N. Y.: M. E. Sharpe, 1979, 34–45.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. “The Function of Measurement in Modern Physical Science.” In The Essential Tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977(a), 178–224.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. “Objectivity, Value Judgement, and Theory Choice.” In The Essential Tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977(b), pp. 320–339.
   Google Scholar
• Lakatos, I. “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.” In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Ed. by I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970, 91–195.
   Google Scholar
• Lakatos, I., and Musgrave, A., eds. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, A. P. “The Scramble for Keynes’ Mantle.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Fall 1978, 1(1), 115–123.
   Google Scholar
• Lewontin, R. C. “Darwin’s Revolution.” New York Review of Books, 16 June 1983, 21–27.
   Google Scholar
• Machlup, F. “Statics and Dynamics: Kaleidoscopic Words.” In Essays in Economic Semantics. New York: W. W. Norton, 1967, 9–42.
   Google Scholar
• McCloskey, D. N. “The Rhetoric of Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature, June 1983, 481–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagatani, K. Macroeconomic Dynamics. New York: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Newton-Smith, W. H. The Rationality of Science. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. “The Production Function and the Theory of Capital.” Review of Economic Studies, 1953-54, 81–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. Economic Heresies. New York: Basic Books, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. “Keynes and Ricardo.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Fall 1978, 1(1). 12–18.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. “History Versus Equilibrium.” In Collected Economic Papers. Vol. 5. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1979, 48–58.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J., and Naqvi, K. A. “The Badly Behaved Production Function.” In Collected Economic Papers, Vol. 4. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1973, 74–86.
   Google Scholar
• Salter, W. E. G. “Productivity, Growth and Accumulation as Historical Processes.” In Problems in Economic Development. Ed. by E. A. G. Robinson. London: Macmillan, 1965, 266–291.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. A. “A Summing Up.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, November 1966, 568–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. “The Creative Response in Economic History.” Journal of Economic History, November 1947, 149–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scriven, M. “Explanation and Prediction in Evolutionary Theory.” Science, 28 August 1959, 477–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solow, R. M. “Cambridge and the Real World.” Times Literary Supplement, 14 March 1975, 277–278.
   Google Scholar
• Suppe, F. “Introduction” and “Afterword.” In The Structure of Scientific Theories. 2nd ed. Ed. by F. Suppe. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Thoben, H. “Mechanistic and Organistic Analogies in Economics Reconsidered.” Kyklos, 1982, 35, 292–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. Foresight and Understanding. New York: Harper and Row, 1961.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. Human Understanding, Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, T. The Place of Science in Modern Civilisation. New York: B. W. Huebsch, 1919.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, V., and Gram, H. Classical and Neoclassical Theories of General Equilibrium. New York: Oxford University Press, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Wilber, C. “Empirical Verification and Theory Selection: The Monetarist-Keynesian Debate.” Journal of Economic Issues, December 1979, 973–982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar